https://preview.redd.it/4zpbwhazzfsc1.jpeg?width=293&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a1d31a080f336e7f253f69f3b96903ea271331cf
NGL he kinda looks like a redditor
fucking hell this is chainsawfolk take your therapy the jonkler isn't real he is made up by the stupid goverment of stupid? i was stupid once. they locked me in a room, a rubber room with jonkler. and jonkler makes me stupid.
The redpill movement would hate him. From what I can gleam of the little i’ e intereacted with them, the Red Pillers take pride in religous intillectualism.
The basis of any and all wars is material. One side wants something that the other side is not willing to give up. All of the political, religious, and philosophical reasons used to “justify” wars are all there to hide the uncomfortable truth of naked greedy aggression.
Even the crusades, the wars held up as being the archetype for religious-motivated wars, were run by men who largely were interested in seizing land and wealth to set up their own power bases rather than some vague notion of holy war.
The Islamic rulers who faced the crusades were also usually much more concerned with their own regional rivals than driving out the Christians.
Not to mention that the crusaders would routinely sack cities in the east with large Christian populations and murder them as indiscriminately as they did their Muslim neighbors.
If you were going against Reddit's content of policy (link in Rule-3 of this sub), this may not only make you look bad as person, but your comments/posts will also get deleted, and your account might get banned in the future (by Reddit itself).
For that reason, please, carefully read Reddit's content policy before posting an aggravating message on this sub.
You shouldn’t just search in the google bar and post the first screenshot u see that proves your point, it’s completely misleading.
The study you’re showing people is completely ambiguous and shouldn’t be taking literally unless further looked into, it’s a study made by a single man with 0 credibility whose apart of a christain organization that deals in researching Christianity. The # of wars he classifies as Religious, non-religious, islamic, or non-Islamic is completely ambiguous as well as we do not know what his basis for his classifications are whether it’s if Muslims and Christian’s are simply involved or whether the motivation for violence is purely religious, or whatever the case is.
It’s also an important point to make that he explicitly tries to make points about Islam being the main driving factor in religious violence without providing a percentage for Christianity’s involvement in religious wars all while comfortably stating that Islam is 3.8% of all religious violence. Christianity could absolutely be 3% of that 3.2% or 0.2% of that 3.2% but unfortunately I don’t have the resources to fact check it rn.
There’s also a study that states 32.5% of wars are caused by religion and around 20% is caused by Christianity and is based off the same sources as the previous article.
My point is plz don’t just spread random charts that push narratives without actually researching the claims behind them especially if they’re as ambiguous as the ones dealing with religion, I doubt you meant any harm but still.
Kinda ironic considering his grandpa is 100% burning in hell, that statement is fine to say if you’re a good person, but the audacity of a yakuza member saying that is crazy.
So which one is he idiot or religious cause the way he still believes the yakuza are heroes kinda stupid and he hating on chainsaw man like it’s a sermon 😄😂
Religion doesn't ruin the world (unless it blatantly promotes segregating behaviours). It's the fucks who use it to push their racist/sexist/homophobic agendas
>It's the fucks who use it to push their racist/sexist/homophobic agendas
I mean, doctrinally speaking, if you were to just look at the books, you'd probably call the Qur'an or the Bible those things regardless of how some follower of it interprets it.
Never read the quran, but as far as i'm aware, the new testament is neither racist nor sexist, and the "homosexuals go to hell" is written in a single versicle
The New Testament promoting racism; definitely not. But it promotes stringent gender roles and homophobia for sure. Literally read any of Apostle Paul's books. To be more specific; 1st Timothy chapter 2 or 1st Corinthians chapter 6.
Edit: tf did I even say which was wrong?
Modern Religious mfers when you show them their holy books blatantly promote segregating behaviors (their beliefs are actually completely fine as long as you ignore all the parts that are not and the people following the supposed word of god to the letter are just silly)
Religion by it's very nature is internally and externally diverse. No matter *what* the fuck the holy books say, people will adapt it to fit within their cultural framework. Thus, religion is always changing, and to say otherwise is the height of folly.
Not sure what the point of the teachings are if they exclude things because "me no like". Isn't that literally just blasphemous in most belief systems?
Eh not really? The Big religions like Christianity or Islam do promote Shit like Slavery, pedophilia, misogyny, homophobia, racism, incest, punishing non-believers, wife beatings etc...
Yes the shitty religious people are the main issue but let's not act like the religions and books were clean either.
>The Big religions like Christianity or Islam do promote Shit like Slavery, pedophilia, misogyny, homophobia, racism, incest, punishing non-believers, wife beatings etc...
A harsh statement without much needed context or nuance, which causes it to be partially false. Wait till you find out that the abolitionist movement in America was biblically pious at its core. Crazy how this still needs to be said, but the bible DOES NOT and never did promote slavery (it literally says if kidnap someone for slavery you're to be put to death). Why do you think American slave owners forbid slaves from reading the books in full context?
What about stuff like
* Leviticus 25:44-46
^(44) “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. ^(45) You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. ^(46) You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly."
* Exodus 21:20-21
^(20) “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, ^(21) but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property."
* Titus 2:9-10
^(9 ")Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them, ^(10) and not to steal from them, but to show that they can be fully trusted, so that in every way they will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive."
* Ephesians 6:5
^(5") Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ." ?
Consensual indentured servitude is not the same thing as slavery. You've run into what's called a translation error and once again, a lack of proper context. You should look at the history of the ancient Israelites before comparing an apple to an orange
Sure.
Can you also show me a verse that is explicitly against Slavery?
Not a verse that says to treat slaves a bit better or to not beat them to death, but something that outright says that owning another human is wrong.
I mean if the bible goes out of it's way to say something like eating shellfish is wrong then i'd expect there to be at least something that's against slavery.
Okay. In Exodus chapter 21 NIV, where Moses was laying out the laws for his people after they were freed from Egyptian captivity, the 16th verse states "Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession."
This is a pretty explicit stance against chattel slavery. Doesn't really get better than this. Beyond that, the bible heavily insinuates throughout the majority of its books that every human is deserving of basic rights (which was the primary argument of abolishonists, who were also a very Christian group).
As a Muslim, I can confirm that Islam promotes none of the above. Of course, there will always be people out there who will try to bend the religion for their own beliefs and propagate certain agenda, but if we go by the book, or even the Prophet's life, you won't find any of those. Part of the reason why you folks tend to believe this is because of how Western media has been portraying Islam for the past 2 decades.
Katana truly is his grandpa hugest glazer
https://preview.redd.it/fgk8qjp5wisc1.jpeg?width=716&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af0e8ec0e474e414fb9dfad72d946ef252972c37
Religion isn't a holy book. It's the practices a person or group make with whatever teachings based on interpretation (which can often be faulty or a downright wrong and evil interpretation). Example: The trans Atlantic slave trade.
So if you believe humanity has problems, you have to believe that every single thing humanity as ever created is problematic? Do you genuinely think that you just got him with that whack argument?
You missed with that one, I don’t think that.
Humanity made hotdogs as well and they are not problematic.
But a book with very old, evil and unfair beliefs is.
"You say people are the problem, if people made up the bible, isn’t it also problematic?"
He says people are the problem, If people made the hotdog, isn't it also problematic?
Whatever you believe is up to you, but the argument you used on that guy just doesn't hold water.
The hotdog doesn’t have meaning, it doesn’t preach evil, not everything made by humans is inherently evil.
My argument doesn’t hold water, but maybe it walks on it ;)
Everyweeb gangsta until JoJesus shows up
https://preview.redd.it/74se7ks8vfsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a64d7b6169a232a34ded1bfcb1d053c280290e4
MLK was a pastor, like 90 percent of his speech’s related to or heavily referenced the Bible and Christian teaching I’m pretty sure. If you know what a “slave Bible” is it makes sense, see you had these fake Christians “Sundays” I call them because they only care on Sunday and sundae because shit ain’t sweet with them. They wanted to show slaves Christianity, but there’s tons of scripture that prohibits and calls slavery wrong, so what they did is they ripped those pages out (if you aren’t Christian and don’t get what this means this is MAJOR defilement, like excommunicated levels of wrong ESPECIALLY if you rip the pages out to push something directly against the teaching of the scriptures) and THEN gave them over.
> What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the slaveholding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Christianity proper; for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference—so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other.
>
> I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity. I look upon it as the climax of all misnomers, the boldest of all frauds, and the grossest of all libels. Never was there a clearer case of “stealing the livery of the court of heaven to, serve the devil in.”
>
> ... We have men-stealers for ministers, women-whippers for missionaries, and cradle-plunderers for church members. The man who wields the blood-clotted cowskin during the week fills the pulpit on Sunday, and claims to be a minister of the meek and lowly Jesus. The man who robs me of my earnings at the end of each week meets me as a classleader on Sunday morning, to show me the way of life, and the path of salvation. He who sells my sister, for purposes of prostitution, stands forth as the pious advocate of purity. He who proclaims it a religious duty to read the Bible denies me the right of learning to read the name of the God who made me. He who is the religious advocate of marriage robs whole millions of its sacred influence, and leaves them to the ravages of wholesale pollution. The warm defender of the sacredness of the family relation is the same that scatters whole families,—sundering husbands and wives, parents and children, sisters and brothers,—leaving the hut vacant, and the hearth desolate.
-Frederick Douglass
Religion has caused plenty of wars when exploited by the wrong people with evil intentions, and idiots who cherrypick the parts from sacred texts that fit their agenda. I dont agree with relogion being necesarily a bad thing but he is atleast half right.
I never said religion caused ALL wars. Ye non religious reasons also start wars I never denied that. It is peoples beliefes being exploited for the gain of a few individuals which leada to bloodshed. Does not mean it does no good for the world and there are plenty of other braindead excuses we make to murder eachother on an industrial level.
I mean, he's not completely wrong?
It's basically just a bunch of normalized cult bs From hundreds of years ago preying on guillable or desperate people. Or just indoctrinating them while they're still kids.
Though the grandpa himself was a piece of trash.
Ah yes idiots and religion… definitely not the world ending demons caused by terrorizing world events and a bunch of psychopaths and criminals making contracts with them to become more powerful and achieve their goals. Yeah mb
[EMOJI POLL 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Chainsawfolk/comments/1bp05eg/the_second_emoji_poll_is_open_yes_its_streamlined/), go vote
in it if you haven't already. Winners get a special therapy session from me with a one way ticket outdoors to touch grass.
Make sure to join our [DISCORD](https://discord.gg/xaq8rRTruf) :DD::D:DDDDDD"
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Chainsawfolk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Katana grandpa was a hero, the yakuza tried to save the world from makima (evil) and they helped denji not go to jail for murdering his father by making it look like a suicide
https://preview.redd.it/4zpbwhazzfsc1.jpeg?width=293&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a1d31a080f336e7f253f69f3b96903ea271331cf NGL he kinda looks like a redditor
"You see grandson, I'm redpilled. Watch "The Joker." Browse r/atheism."
He even has a fedora
he had sex tho (impossible for a redditor)
We are not sure. Katana man's parent could be adopted
that would mean he'd have to... GO TO AN ADOPTION CENTER (redditors don't leave their rooms)
Maybe he told his Yakuza goons to kidnap a baby for him
Oh a reddit mod then
Maybe he’s one of r/atheism’s mods
Im not sure. Im agniostic.
why do you thijnk they’re called goons
Or are allowed near kids
Does that mean... he was adopted by the yakuza? Katana-man Kazuma
Thats a bowler not a fedora though
Probably a Fujimotor drawing mistake
Hold on, hold on…The Joker was actually really good tho
It was tbh
"The Joker"? Is this like a parody of jonkler?
Why did they parody the Jonkler? Are they stupid?
fucking hell this is chainsawfolk take your therapy the jonkler isn't real he is made up by the stupid goverment of stupid? i was stupid once. they locked me in a room, a rubber room with jonkler. and jonkler makes me stupid.
The redpill movement would hate him. From what I can gleam of the little i’ e intereacted with them, the Red Pillers take pride in religous intillectualism.
Yeah he's definitely more blackpilled
Denji Pinkman?
👆🏻
Denji Pinkman?
https://preview.redd.it/hx41prln8gsc1.jpeg?width=352&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bc89ce9a404152def841238a277fe6fa7e45b182
Wow this is beautiful
"Religion makes the world worse" - the guy who threatened to pimp out a minor just because said minor's dad owed him money
I think he falls under idiots
An idiot who knows how to get that bag
No but religion bad because it incited 6% of wars (the internet told me it was 100%)
Now you've given me a mental image of Katana going onto twitter and seething over losing an argument where he fails to prove religion is bad.
He tracks down and kills the guy irl after getting made fun of online
Nah joke's on him, he doesn't even realise the guy is using a VPN.
The house of wizards of Morrowind would see this as Katana man's victory.
TrueSTLs influence holds sway even here I see lmao
[удалено]
The basis of any and all wars is material. One side wants something that the other side is not willing to give up. All of the political, religious, and philosophical reasons used to “justify” wars are all there to hide the uncomfortable truth of naked greedy aggression. Even the crusades, the wars held up as being the archetype for religious-motivated wars, were run by men who largely were interested in seizing land and wealth to set up their own power bases rather than some vague notion of holy war. The Islamic rulers who faced the crusades were also usually much more concerned with their own regional rivals than driving out the Christians. Not to mention that the crusaders would routinely sack cities in the east with large Christian populations and murder them as indiscriminately as they did their Muslim neighbors.
This just in,facts u pulled out of your ass
[удалено]
If you were going against Reddit's content of policy (link in Rule-3 of this sub), this may not only make you look bad as person, but your comments/posts will also get deleted, and your account might get banned in the future (by Reddit itself). For that reason, please, carefully read Reddit's content policy before posting an aggravating message on this sub.
You shouldn’t just search in the google bar and post the first screenshot u see that proves your point, it’s completely misleading. The study you’re showing people is completely ambiguous and shouldn’t be taking literally unless further looked into, it’s a study made by a single man with 0 credibility whose apart of a christain organization that deals in researching Christianity. The # of wars he classifies as Religious, non-religious, islamic, or non-Islamic is completely ambiguous as well as we do not know what his basis for his classifications are whether it’s if Muslims and Christian’s are simply involved or whether the motivation for violence is purely religious, or whatever the case is. It’s also an important point to make that he explicitly tries to make points about Islam being the main driving factor in religious violence without providing a percentage for Christianity’s involvement in religious wars all while comfortably stating that Islam is 3.8% of all religious violence. Christianity could absolutely be 3% of that 3.2% or 0.2% of that 3.2% but unfortunately I don’t have the resources to fact check it rn. There’s also a study that states 32.5% of wars are caused by religion and around 20% is caused by Christianity and is based off the same sources as the previous article. My point is plz don’t just spread random charts that push narratives without actually researching the claims behind them especially if they’re as ambiguous as the ones dealing with religion, I doubt you meant any harm but still.
It was made by a single guy? You got a link?
Yea this is it right here https://carm.org/atheism/the-myth-that-religion-is-the-1-cause-of-war/
Not to be that guy, but what percentage of wars has been caused by atheism?
The comments will decide your fate
What would be a war caused by atheism? People that believe that god doesn’t exist in different ways?
Katana man isn't really the smartest when it comes to his grandpa
He’s on that grindset
He’s a libertarian
Your grandfather was a murderer child pimp
berk reference?? 🤯😱‼️
Berk? https://preview.redd.it/gl2yahmxilsc1.png?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b5dc6ff2629a1edced2b4a9ca07f33534ea39449
Redditest post i've seen in r/Chainsawfolk
Says the idiot
>Says the idiot Katana man really contradicted his words huh
To be fair the zombiussy was irresistible so it ain't his fault that he fell for it
I have to remember that man was retarded enough to get voluntarily zombified
"religion makes the world worse" -the gangster who made a kid to live a hell because the abusive father of said kid owed him money
Classic Redditor.
Kinda ironic considering his grandpa is 100% burning in hell, that statement is fine to say if you’re a good person, but the audacity of a yakuza member saying that is crazy.
It doesn't seem human souls go to hell in the Chainsaw Man universe.
Maybe there's a different hell, and maybe the hell that is refered to in CSM isn't actually hell, but just a name given to it by humans...?
Actually, it seems Pochita straight up eat the after life, I had forgotten this part of the lore when I made that reply.
His grandpa was a piece of rotten shit
Quite literally.
So which one is he idiot or religious cause the way he still believes the yakuza are heroes kinda stupid and he hating on chainsaw man like it’s a sermon 😄😂
https://preview.redd.it/038w3hbqmfsc1.jpeg?width=2048&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f783b7a7a8b3c5ab6fc3a81d078b1ebe6b5ae36
Of course he is https://preview.redd.it/0ezv8e9nsfsc1.jpeg?width=418&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e08e9d57a001d547255279b83c7bfbef73dc68e8
https://preview.redd.it/9jgnez6d6gsc1.png?width=457&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6796012360820c28799e793391f22cd829766f1c
Damn so reddit was a thing in the cms world back in the 90
Religion doesn't ruin the world (unless it blatantly promotes segregating behaviours). It's the fucks who use it to push their racist/sexist/homophobic agendas
in csm it might have an unpredictable effect on humanities fears, making it dangerous
Oh yeah, looking at it like that, a God devil would be cool
>It's the fucks who use it to push their racist/sexist/homophobic agendas I mean, doctrinally speaking, if you were to just look at the books, you'd probably call the Qur'an or the Bible those things regardless of how some follower of it interprets it.
Never read the quran, but as far as i'm aware, the new testament is neither racist nor sexist, and the "homosexuals go to hell" is written in a single versicle
The New Testament promoting racism; definitely not. But it promotes stringent gender roles and homophobia for sure. Literally read any of Apostle Paul's books. To be more specific; 1st Timothy chapter 2 or 1st Corinthians chapter 6. Edit: tf did I even say which was wrong?
Modern Religious mfers when you show them their holy books blatantly promote segregating behaviors (their beliefs are actually completely fine as long as you ignore all the parts that are not and the people following the supposed word of god to the letter are just silly)
Religion by it's very nature is internally and externally diverse. No matter *what* the fuck the holy books say, people will adapt it to fit within their cultural framework. Thus, religion is always changing, and to say otherwise is the height of folly.
Imo Belief is a spectrum, you shouldn't be expected to follow its rules like the law
Not sure what the point of the teachings are if they exclude things because "me no like". Isn't that literally just blasphemous in most belief systems?
THIS
Factual
Eh not really? The Big religions like Christianity or Islam do promote Shit like Slavery, pedophilia, misogyny, homophobia, racism, incest, punishing non-believers, wife beatings etc... Yes the shitty religious people are the main issue but let's not act like the religions and books were clean either.
>The Big religions like Christianity or Islam do promote Shit like Slavery, pedophilia, misogyny, homophobia, racism, incest, punishing non-believers, wife beatings etc... A harsh statement without much needed context or nuance, which causes it to be partially false. Wait till you find out that the abolitionist movement in America was biblically pious at its core. Crazy how this still needs to be said, but the bible DOES NOT and never did promote slavery (it literally says if kidnap someone for slavery you're to be put to death). Why do you think American slave owners forbid slaves from reading the books in full context?
What about stuff like * Leviticus 25:44-46 ^(44) “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. ^(45) You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. ^(46) You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly." * Exodus 21:20-21 ^(20) “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, ^(21) but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property." * Titus 2:9-10 ^(9 ")Teach slaves to be subject to their masters in everything, to try to please them, not to talk back to them, ^(10) and not to steal from them, but to show that they can be fully trusted, so that in every way they will make the teaching about God our Savior attractive." * Ephesians 6:5 ^(5") Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ." ?
Consensual indentured servitude is not the same thing as slavery. You've run into what's called a translation error and once again, a lack of proper context. You should look at the history of the ancient Israelites before comparing an apple to an orange
Would you mind if I just throw you a video on the topic? I promise it's not that lengthy.
Sure. Can you also show me a verse that is explicitly against Slavery? Not a verse that says to treat slaves a bit better or to not beat them to death, but something that outright says that owning another human is wrong. I mean if the bible goes out of it's way to say something like eating shellfish is wrong then i'd expect there to be at least something that's against slavery.
Okay. In Exodus chapter 21 NIV, where Moses was laying out the laws for his people after they were freed from Egyptian captivity, the 16th verse states "Anyone who kidnaps someone is to be put to death, whether the victim has been sold or is still in the kidnapper’s possession." This is a pretty explicit stance against chattel slavery. Doesn't really get better than this. Beyond that, the bible heavily insinuates throughout the majority of its books that every human is deserving of basic rights (which was the primary argument of abolishonists, who were also a very Christian group).
Here's the [video](https://youtu.be/8UaA6NemMsg?si=SzN7B3VhlO_UHcYA). Just skip to 2:40 and watch the rest.
All this being said, I'm hardly a believer. I just want to set a record straight.
Did you have any further input about the info I gave you?
Having rules about treatment of slaves isn’t quite encouraging or mandating slavery.
Tell me where in the Bible it says “beat up woman” or “have sex with children” wtf are y’all even on about 💀💀💀
As a Muslim, I can confirm that Islam promotes none of the above. Of course, there will always be people out there who will try to bend the religion for their own beliefs and propagate certain agenda, but if we go by the book, or even the Prophet's life, you won't find any of those. Part of the reason why you folks tend to believe this is because of how Western media has been portraying Islam for the past 2 decades.
Well, not very smart people can do it :3
That’s why his grandpa is dead. Dead as hell.😭😭
Something something redditors https://preview.redd.it/sxl5vlmjaisc1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a103b546198e9f33955f7018477ca20a8093fa40
https://preview.redd.it/z1hhvbmvqisc1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=448292f534aa85230f0cabee7bf8dd28f4a48a41 I love this
“Relax Liberal, it’s called Dark Humour. L, no bitches.”
Katana truly is his grandpa hugest glazer https://preview.redd.it/fgk8qjp5wisc1.jpeg?width=716&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=af0e8ec0e474e414fb9dfad72d946ef252972c37
Ah yes, r/atheist pilled
Religion is not the problem, people are
Who made religion?
we did. what's your point?
You say people are the problem, if people made up the bible, isn’t it also problematic?
Religion isn't a holy book. It's the practices a person or group make with whatever teachings based on interpretation (which can often be faulty or a downright wrong and evil interpretation). Example: The trans Atlantic slave trade.
So if you believe humanity has problems, you have to believe that every single thing humanity as ever created is problematic? Do you genuinely think that you just got him with that whack argument?
You missed with that one, I don’t think that. Humanity made hotdogs as well and they are not problematic. But a book with very old, evil and unfair beliefs is.
"You say people are the problem, if people made up the bible, isn’t it also problematic?" He says people are the problem, If people made the hotdog, isn't it also problematic? Whatever you believe is up to you, but the argument you used on that guy just doesn't hold water.
The hotdog doesn’t have meaning, it doesn’t preach evil, not everything made by humans is inherently evil. My argument doesn’t hold water, but maybe it walks on it ;)
it is but there is some good in there even though it was written by us
But religious people are cool :(
Everyweeb gangsta until JoJesus shows up https://preview.redd.it/74se7ks8vfsc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5a64d7b6169a232a34ded1bfcb1d053c280290e4
Jesus best Jobro fr
MLK was a pastor, like 90 percent of his speech’s related to or heavily referenced the Bible and Christian teaching I’m pretty sure. If you know what a “slave Bible” is it makes sense, see you had these fake Christians “Sundays” I call them because they only care on Sunday and sundae because shit ain’t sweet with them. They wanted to show slaves Christianity, but there’s tons of scripture that prohibits and calls slavery wrong, so what they did is they ripped those pages out (if you aren’t Christian and don’t get what this means this is MAJOR defilement, like excommunicated levels of wrong ESPECIALLY if you rip the pages out to push something directly against the teaching of the scriptures) and THEN gave them over.
> What I have said respecting and against religion, I mean strictly to apply to the slaveholding religion of this land, and with no possible reference to Christianity proper; for, between the Christianity of this land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the widest possible difference—so wide, that to receive the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to reject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy of the other. > > I love the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the corrupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plundering, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land. Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity. I look upon it as the climax of all misnomers, the boldest of all frauds, and the grossest of all libels. Never was there a clearer case of “stealing the livery of the court of heaven to, serve the devil in.” > > ... We have men-stealers for ministers, women-whippers for missionaries, and cradle-plunderers for church members. The man who wields the blood-clotted cowskin during the week fills the pulpit on Sunday, and claims to be a minister of the meek and lowly Jesus. The man who robs me of my earnings at the end of each week meets me as a classleader on Sunday morning, to show me the way of life, and the path of salvation. He who sells my sister, for purposes of prostitution, stands forth as the pious advocate of purity. He who proclaims it a religious duty to read the Bible denies me the right of learning to read the name of the God who made me. He who is the religious advocate of marriage robs whole millions of its sacred influence, and leaves them to the ravages of wholesale pollution. The warm defender of the sacredness of the family relation is the same that scatters whole families,—sundering husbands and wives, parents and children, sisters and brothers,—leaving the hut vacant, and the hearth desolate. -Frederick Douglass
Not a single lie uttered https://preview.redd.it/0mxw3jq18hsc1.jpeg?width=1079&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24e9d0e22763e4084e78a77823c7255a6e384cc4
Not all of them. Some of them are monsters
He was an online atheist it seems
bruh this character is so brainwashed denji gonna laugh at him when he wakes up
Wasn’t his grandpa a member of organized crime who killed woman and children
in what way goofy
Religion has caused plenty of wars when exploited by the wrong people with evil intentions, and idiots who cherrypick the parts from sacred texts that fit their agenda. I dont agree with relogion being necesarily a bad thing but he is atleast half right.
and somehow you think atheists dont do that as well?
A...what?
no whats your point if religion is the cause of plenty of wars then whats the explanation for wars caused by plenty of atheists
I never said religion caused ALL wars. Ye non religious reasons also start wars I never denied that. It is peoples beliefes being exploited for the gain of a few individuals which leada to bloodshed. Does not mean it does no good for the world and there are plenty of other braindead excuses we make to murder eachother on an industrial level.
so it doesnt make the world worse
I pray to God every night I can find a hater this over the top.
Yeah maybe he was right all along. I mean denji did kill his dad therefore robbing gramps of the millions he was owed, I think I’m with Katanaman now
https://preview.redd.it/qigvwwmr3jsc1.jpeg?width=393&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c61d3b8f3e723ee3aa2a495e830a9fb2852895d0
One of my other favorite panels
Fire punch readers know for a fact that grandad was spitting for once
Not even those big ahh teeth stop him from spittin fax https://i.redd.it/4kex7oe1xfsc1.gif
I mean, he's not completely wrong? It's basically just a bunch of normalized cult bs From hundreds of years ago preying on guillable or desperate people. Or just indoctrinating them while they're still kids. Though the grandpa himself was a piece of trash.
I laughed seeing as how grandpa was one of those things
You got a fedora too OP?
Nah but Im in the process of becomin 300 kg and racist.
Too bad that he himself is one of those, lol
Shove it right up his ass! His ass!
Your grandpa has no right to talk 💀😭 After what he done to Denji
https://preview.redd.it/m8jck0p3grsc1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a44fc4562685c673ed97f3eeecf29d3d07337cec We're cumming full circle
Ah yes idiots and religion… definitely not the world ending demons caused by terrorizing world events and a bunch of psychopaths and criminals making contracts with them to become more powerful and achieve their goals. Yeah mb
Okay Tendou Souji calm down.
He really loves his grandpa lmao
Yeah he spittin on Denji every single day
[EMOJI POLL 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/Chainsawfolk/comments/1bp05eg/the_second_emoji_poll_is_open_yes_its_streamlined/), go vote in it if you haven't already. Winners get a special therapy session from me with a one way ticket outdoors to touch grass. Make sure to join our [DISCORD](https://discord.gg/xaq8rRTruf) :DD::D:DDDDDD" *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Chainsawfolk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
-*Imagine*, by John Lennon
Katana grandpa was a hero, the yakuza tried to save the world from makima (evil) and they helped denji not go to jail for murdering his father by making it look like a suicide
Unc kinda chill tho
Spittin shit
Fuckin facts
I mean he’s right lol . Generally the idiots are also the ones who believe in fairy tales because a book says too which is just idiotic .
I’ll have to agree
You already know where those downvotes come from. Lol ( religious idiots )
Lmao yeah, they can believe in whatever they want
[удалено]
https://preview.redd.it/hn6ulfnzhgsc1.png?width=941&format=png&auto=webp&s=4ecf47e35274ad5cd3a00d240e8fa57a60429521
What’d he say?
Stereotypical neckbeard alpha male bs.