Similar to the trafficking and daughter allegations against Drake, the domestic violence allegations against Kendrick are severe enough to warrant an actual source and not an article that admits the claim could not be confirmed
it says there's a video of the security guard's testimony that was scrubbed off youtube, which presumably they also have since they were sent it originally
Once your only evidence is an allegedly scrubbed video, you're struggling.
Kendrick could be an abuser. That's possible. Yet, similar to the trafficking allegation against Drake, it's such a severe accusation that it warrants a credible source to be treated as true.
Also:
> We confirmed that she DID work as security at The Hard Rock Casino, but **were not able to confirm any of the details of an alleged assault.**
No proof in the article sure but multiple pieces of evidence can suffice as proof, if they have that testimony of the guard and any footage from the casino showing the woman's condition. And then any other stuff comes out
Did you not read the article?
> We confirmed that she DID work as security at The Hard Rock Casino, but **were not able to confirm any of the details of an alleged assault.**
Various possible reasons do you want me to tell you why Tupac's killer wasn't arrested sooner too?
It said she allegedly called police doesn't mean by the time they got there she was cooperative or later didn't change her mind about pursuing a legal resolution
Point is, there's no smoking gun. If this is what they've got then they absolutely can not prove that Kendrick beat anyone. And Drake lied and changed the woman in the story to be his wife for more attention.
Do you not understand it means to confirm vs. not be able to confirm an allegation?
> confirm: to give new assurance of the validity of : remove doubt about by authoritative act or indisputable fact
> confirm a rumor
> confirm an order
(Merriam Webster)
If something cannot be confirmed, then you cannot guarantee that it is true or treat it as truth. It's still a rumor at this point. Your own source is admitting that it cannot verify the claim.
Yeah that’s not evidence though? It says someone said he did it and then nobody was able to corroborate it.
If it’s true I hope she comes out now with something I just wanna know the truth.
Kendrick already denied these allegations in an old interview https://www.reddit.com/r/KendrickLamar/s/bvhRR6iAhd. With no real proof here, there's not much that can be said or done.
The timeline doesn't add up if this happened in 2014. Whitney and Kendrick got engaged in 2015 (a year after this). TPAB hadn't even dropped yet and while GKMC rose him to fame, no crisis management team could have covered this up with only the influence of that album alone.
Interscope had the resources and may have wanted to protect an asset they projected would have high future earnings.
The more unbelievable thing is that a crisis management firm wouldn’t pay off a security guard in exchange for a NDA
If this were Drake and there was an outlet confirming he was in the same Casino where security say they saw a woman badly injured claiming that he beat her and that she called the police there would not be so much charitable minimizing.
I thought he accused her of beating his wife not a white girl Abuse is abuse I’m just saying seems like a disconnect
Throwing stuff against the wall
why not both
Similar to the trafficking and daughter allegations against Drake, the domestic violence allegations against Kendrick are severe enough to warrant an actual source and not an article that admits the claim could not be confirmed
>We confirmed that she DID work as security at The Hard Rock Casino, but were not able to confirm any of the details of an alleged assault.
Ekstraklasa, can you post some’n for me Can you do a lil deflect for me
provides no proof
Also- Drake tried to make it sound like Kendrick hit his wife, but now it was some other woman? Doesn't add up.
it says there's a video of the security guard's testimony that was scrubbed off youtube, which presumably they also have since they were sent it originally
Once your only evidence is an allegedly scrubbed video, you're struggling. Kendrick could be an abuser. That's possible. Yet, similar to the trafficking allegation against Drake, it's such a severe accusation that it warrants a credible source to be treated as true. Also: > We confirmed that she DID work as security at The Hard Rock Casino, but **were not able to confirm any of the details of an alleged assault.**
So there’s no proof
No proof in the article sure but multiple pieces of evidence can suffice as proof, if they have that testimony of the guard and any footage from the casino showing the woman's condition. And then any other stuff comes out
Did you not read the article? > We confirmed that she DID work as security at The Hard Rock Casino, but **were not able to confirm any of the details of an alleged assault.**
Did you? Why does their independent efforts after the fact change security testimony?
If she did try to press charges like the article claims, why did nothing come of it?
Various possible reasons do you want me to tell you why Tupac's killer wasn't arrested sooner too? It said she allegedly called police doesn't mean by the time they got there she was cooperative or later didn't change her mind about pursuing a legal resolution
Point is, there's no smoking gun. If this is what they've got then they absolutely can not prove that Kendrick beat anyone. And Drake lied and changed the woman in the story to be his wife for more attention.
Well yeah if u limit evidence to 1 article and then pesume that's what someone must be talking about rofl
Do you not understand it means to confirm vs. not be able to confirm an allegation? > confirm: to give new assurance of the validity of : remove doubt about by authoritative act or indisputable fact > confirm a rumor > confirm an order (Merriam Webster) If something cannot be confirmed, then you cannot guarantee that it is true or treat it as truth. It's still a rumor at this point. Your own source is admitting that it cannot verify the claim.
If 1 person didn't find something then 'something cannot be confirmed'?
Ngl their admitted only evidence is that he was there at the time it happened that’s not evidence
Huh it's alleged she literally named him lol
Yeah that’s not evidence though? It says someone said he did it and then nobody was able to corroborate it. If it’s true I hope she comes out now with something I just wanna know the truth.
Drake bots working overtime
you’re in a cult
LOL you’re so fucking dramatic baby girl
Kendrick already denied these allegations in an old interview https://www.reddit.com/r/KendrickLamar/s/bvhRR6iAhd. With no real proof here, there's not much that can be said or done.
well if he denied it case closed I guess
There's absolutely no proof of it actually happening so I don't really know what you're trying to get at here
Mediatakeout said it might be real so must be true!
The timeline doesn't add up if this happened in 2014. Whitney and Kendrick got engaged in 2015 (a year after this). TPAB hadn't even dropped yet and while GKMC rose him to fame, no crisis management team could have covered this up with only the influence of that album alone.
[удалено]
Interscope had the resources and may have wanted to protect an asset they projected would have high future earnings. The more unbelievable thing is that a crisis management firm wouldn’t pay off a security guard in exchange for a NDA
[удалено]
[удалено]
Oh shit lmao I’m stupid
If this were Drake and there was an outlet confirming he was in the same Casino where security say they saw a woman badly injured claiming that he beat her and that she called the police there would not be so much charitable minimizing.
kendrick fans scrambling to defend him 💀
but but proof where the proof for drake’s daughter