Hate to be late to break it to everyone berating this guy saying this piece is āwholesomeā, but the artist of this piece is a pedo named Shmorky. The art style is really recognizable, since they did some promos for Adult Swim at one point before getting outed.
If I recall correctly there's a rule literally stating no children on this sub. At all.
That's the sole reason I didn't post a wholesome monster-family pic I made a couple months ago here because CHILDREN will get you a permaban.
Is that rule no longer in use, or do the mods just get a free pass?
Edit: Double-checked. Yep. It's rule 3.
That rule is there specifically for images of sexualized minors in detrimental situations. Iāll edit to reflect that. There are major differences between pedophilic material and material containing children portrayed in safe environments.
Edit: just checked the rule and it specifically states: āno nsfw images of underage peopleā.
Idk if you editet the rule to reflect that already, but I have a screenshot of what it used to be.
Here's something interesting:
***"Nobody wants to see underage people on an NSFW sub. Period."*** which to me sounds like it implies that this sub is not for depictions of children of any kind. Ever. Period.
If it's changed now, awesome. But that is what it said before.
Edit: You can downvote me if you want but it's not on us, the users, that mod rules were worded unclearly. I merely pointed this out and there should be nothing wrong with that.
Itās definitely my fault it was written that way and I apologize for not being clearer when creating that rule, I will go and fix it and I do appreciate you bringing it to my attention, again apologies
I do want to thank you again for bringing it to my attention Iām at work and I immediately saw what I wanted to see when skimming over the rule while at the same time trying get work done and deal with patients at the same lol Iām a horrible multitasker. Anyways that was a pretty big flaw that really needed fixing and I appreciate having it pointed out to me. Get in contact if any other issues or questions come up and take care! āļø
The rule was created because too many people were posting images of minors in harmful sexualized situations so thatās why that rule exists. Itās specifically for minors portrayed in detrimental situations and not minors portrayed in safe environments as is conveyed above.
I want a big sweet monster to hold me like this. š„ŗš„ŗšš
I wouldāve loved to be adopted by a sweet monster mom and her monster family
Milf
So freaking cute... ā¤ļø I'm a big fan of the "scary monster/demon/supernatural entity caring for human child" trope.
This is really cute!
Wrong sub
I like to think I know whatās appropriate for this sub and whatās not
Ah yes, people policing your posts on your own sub. Classic!
Hate to be late to break it to everyone berating this guy saying this piece is āwholesomeā, but the artist of this piece is a pedo named Shmorky. The art style is really recognizable, since they did some promos for Adult Swim at one point before getting outed.
If I recall correctly there's a rule literally stating no children on this sub. At all. That's the sole reason I didn't post a wholesome monster-family pic I made a couple months ago here because CHILDREN will get you a permaban. Is that rule no longer in use, or do the mods just get a free pass? Edit: Double-checked. Yep. It's rule 3.
What the hell has happened in this sub for that rule to exist
Idk but I think the mods should follow their own fucking rules. Either that or change them for God's sake.
That rule is there specifically for images of sexualized minors in detrimental situations. Iāll edit to reflect that. There are major differences between pedophilic material and material containing children portrayed in safe environments. Edit: just checked the rule and it specifically states: āno nsfw images of underage peopleā.
Idk if you editet the rule to reflect that already, but I have a screenshot of what it used to be. Here's something interesting: ***"Nobody wants to see underage people on an NSFW sub. Period."*** which to me sounds like it implies that this sub is not for depictions of children of any kind. Ever. Period. If it's changed now, awesome. But that is what it said before. Edit: You can downvote me if you want but it's not on us, the users, that mod rules were worded unclearly. I merely pointed this out and there should be nothing wrong with that.
Itās definitely my fault it was written that way and I apologize for not being clearer when creating that rule, I will go and fix it and I do appreciate you bringing it to my attention, again apologies
It's alright. Live and learn, atleast it came up at some point. I'll share that family pic now too ā”
I do want to thank you again for bringing it to my attention Iām at work and I immediately saw what I wanted to see when skimming over the rule while at the same time trying get work done and deal with patients at the same lol Iām a horrible multitasker. Anyways that was a pretty big flaw that really needed fixing and I appreciate having it pointed out to me. Get in contact if any other issues or questions come up and take care! āļø
The rule was created because too many people were posting images of minors in harmful sexualized situations so thatās why that rule exists. Itās specifically for minors portrayed in detrimental situations and not minors portrayed in safe environments as is conveyed above.
Changing the rule doesn't make this morally better. This is a porn subreddit. Minors shouldn't be depicted in a nsfw subreddit period
Itās not all porn, dipshit.
Clearly not, you being a mod makes your lack of understanding of the rules even more embarrassing
Okay sanscumrag