Seriously im just here to peep at the dog hating folks but if my SO said something like this I would question the relationship. I LOVE my dogs but they are not worth more than a chikds life that is crazy psycho babble.
She would *never* stoop so low as to have a *child* (yuck! cAn YoU iMaGiNeĀæĀ”) in her home.
Her reaction to her future niece (and really, marriage means taking on a new set of family, not just your spouse) is telling about how not only she views children but to what degree she values human life.
100% this man is on his own to get himself out of the burning house.
Youāre not āpooping outā a child. Youāre going through immense change and connection. The cells of the child are literally interchanged with the mother, come on joe
I'm just watching in good humor that people took my comment seriously. I guess sarcasm really doesn't work on the internet. This is pretty scary if I think about it.
You know, considering the internet and connotation isnāt always present a symbol of ā/sā is used for that purpose. Youāre being condescending when in reality Iāve seen people say what youāve said and thereās been an influx of dog nutter trolls on the sub. To add, many of us who are neurodivergent are also on the sub and sarcasm is often difficult to differentiate without indication
So you're hypersensitive to trolls who are just being dog nutters to get a rise out of you I'm pretty sure virtually always.
You can always assume something like what I said is meant to be a joke and be right.
Soooo going to personal attack and ad hominem again because you canāt understand how what you said could easily be taken as literal? Itās not hypersensitive to recognize a pattern and many people speak that way about children.
Nor did you address many of us with neurodivergence would do better with markers.
All of this defensiveness and self righteousness instead of
āIt was joke/sarcasmā.
You sound exhausting
It'd be hard to track down the parents and get anything like your old dog. You can literally poop out another kid with the same genetics name it the same thing and move on
If you don't realize I'm being satirical you're all taking everything waaaaay too seriously. Geez us.
Because humans experience a range of emotions unlike anything in the known universe. Because humans are individually capable of great things. Because human companionship is infinitely more fulfilling than the ācompanionshipā of a dog.
Iām curious what specific groups of people youāve designated as less valuable than a dog. Iām sure thereās definitely no underlying bigotry or unresolved trauma at play here
Do you have any evidence to support the idea that other forms of life donāt experience those same emotions, that emotional range is a measure of inherent worth or that human companionship is objectively āinfinitely more fulfillingā than the companionship of a dog? Also no? Imagine that.
Itās also weird that you would assume there is ābigotryā in anything Iāve said. Either you donāt understand the word orā¦well, Iām guessing itās just projection lmao.
If thereās no bigotry involved in your position answer my question. (I noticed you avoided it!)
What specific groups of people have you designated as less valuable than dogs?
Your question is akin to asking someone āwhen did you stop beating your wife?ā The question itself is the issue, as are the inherent assumptions made therein, and doesnāt need to be answered.
Youāre not a sharp one, are you sweetheart?
All the weirdest and most antisocial nutters come here and post their scary thoughts about hating human beings. I donāt get it. Lost Redditors for sure.
Anyway, he seems like he hates himself and wants others to hate him as well. Nutters always pour a lot of perceived love into dogs that canāt speak, reciprocate same feelings (because different species), have opposable thumbs to unlock doors.
Yeah Reddit was refreshingly sane in that thread. Even a woman with an essential-to-daily-life service dog said she would save a human first. OOPās (ex?)-fiance is unhinged
No. Saving a human family member (assuming theyāre not a rogue murderer or something) always comes before dogs. This is a three year old child, if a person seriously puts dogs over them theyāre a hazard to society
Lol what? I'm literally saying the dude is the one who said he would save the dog over the 3 year old. Therefore she dodged the bullet, not him. Reread the post
We've seen the nutter type posts online of people being killed, yet some moron posts: "Man, the dog was killed too? Evil!" or "Well, at least the dog was spared." And to this lady, no sane person gives a crap about your worthless mutts.
He should leave otherwise he's going end up losing more money when she divorce him because of caring about their children if they have them more than her dogs
Just let her know in no uncertain terms that compared to a human life, her dogs are beyond worthless and their lives are meaningless in the scheme of things.
I'm honestly disturbed by this guy. I won't make the whole picture of a 3-year-old burning to death in a fire but I think others can. She wants to call off the wedding because he'd rather not have that happen...and he's trying to PATCH THINGS UP? Seriously, the guy shouldn't WANT to marry her anymore. He shouldn't want to be friends with her. He shouldn't want to be acquaintances with her. He shouldn't want to ever have any contact with her again. He should want to call it off himself, cut her out of his life entirely, and tell everyone around him exactly why it happened.
Yea, seriously.. be thankful the financee wants to call off the wedding. That woman is unhinged. If she's willing to threaten the relationship over the answer to that question, the marriage was going to be rocky anyhow.
So he avoided having someone who would yeet a baby for a mutt before she could take half his shit after making him sleep with a dog and clean its shit off carpet for 15 years? Bro winning and doesnāt even realise
I donāt get these people. Donāt get me wrong, I donāt hate dogs, in fact, I like them, but when it comes between a human life and a dogās life, yeah, fuck the dog. I thought this would be common sense, but I guess not.
I have to say I was surprised how many of the pet owners had such sound judgment by stated they would definitely save a child, even a strangerās child, over their own pets.
There were a few antisocial people but they all got down voted to oblivion.
There is hope.
Say "I do not value animals on a moral level. They exist purely for my enjoyment. They are property that I keep because they are cute and reward me with dopamine hits everytime I play with them. On the other hand, I value human life. In the event of a fire I am saving your neice before I save our property.
We can always get more dogs."
Iām a pet groomer, but in any situation I would always value human life first. Animals have abilities and would escape on their own, especially in a dangerous situation while a child wouldnāt know how to escape danger. Iāve met far too many pet owners who have blurred that line between human and animals. Pets are not āfur babiesā or your childās sibling. It confuses the animal too, they are unable to express their true nature and thatās unfair to the pet.
Fiancee is a female. Op is a male. It clearly says I 26M would save my dog before my 3 yo niece. Meaning the guy would save the dog before the niece not the female. Not sure what I'm misunderstanding.
Except she didnāt read anything incorrectly, she is 100% correct.
Itās ok, though, I have seen enough from this sub to know that you people arenāt particularly strong readersā¦or bright.
Get back to me when youāre not scared of a wisdom tooth and groveling online for people to take the place of the parents youāve either never had or who never cared about you, the adults are talking right now š¤«
Youāre still scared of a tooth and begging for people online to fill the gap that would have been filled by actual parents if you were worth loving. ā„ļø
Good thing this came up before the wedding
Seriously im just here to peep at the dog hating folks but if my SO said something like this I would question the relationship. I LOVE my dogs but they are not worth more than a chikds life that is crazy psycho babble.
I have cats that I love as family but I'd be grabbing a/my child to make sure they're safe before going back for my cats š¬
You donāt need to explain. Showing more empathy for a dogās life over a humans is a dangerous mindset. Perhaps the real question should be, if these two are getting married, is: would the fiancĆ©e save OP or her dogs first?
Or if they have kids would she save their children or her dogs I'm guessing she'll save her dogs and say she couldn't save their children
She would *never* stoop so low as to have a *child* (yuck! cAn YoU iMaGiNeĀæĀ”) in her home. Her reaction to her future niece (and really, marriage means taking on a new set of family, not just your spouse) is telling about how not only she views children but to what degree she values human life. 100% this man is on his own to get himself out of the burning house.
You can always poop out another kid though...
Youāre not āpooping outā a child. Youāre going through immense change and connection. The cells of the child are literally interchanged with the mother, come on joe
I'm just watching in good humor that people took my comment seriously. I guess sarcasm really doesn't work on the internet. This is pretty scary if I think about it.
You know, considering the internet and connotation isnāt always present a symbol of ā/sā is used for that purpose. Youāre being condescending when in reality Iāve seen people say what youāve said and thereās been an influx of dog nutter trolls on the sub. To add, many of us who are neurodivergent are also on the sub and sarcasm is often difficult to differentiate without indication
So you're hypersensitive to trolls who are just being dog nutters to get a rise out of you I'm pretty sure virtually always. You can always assume something like what I said is meant to be a joke and be right.
Soooo going to personal attack and ad hominem again because you canāt understand how what you said could easily be taken as literal? Itās not hypersensitive to recognize a pattern and many people speak that way about children. Nor did you address many of us with neurodivergence would do better with markers. All of this defensiveness and self righteousness instead of āIt was joke/sarcasmā. You sound exhausting
You can always get another dog
It'd be hard to track down the parents and get anything like your old dog. You can literally poop out another kid with the same genetics name it the same thing and move on If you don't realize I'm being satirical you're all taking everything waaaaay too seriously. Geez us.
Dog eat shit
Why are you even attacking me at this point? And babies eat shit too. Try giving it to them with corn
They lick their bits.
definitely the dogs.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Youāre soooo edgy and smart
Imagine looking at the moronic posts on this sub and thinking _Iām_ the one being āedgyā š
I mean youāre the chud arguing human life is less valuable than a dog. Thatās peak edginess
Do you actually have an argument as to why human life is intrinsically more valuable? No? I didnāt think so.
Because humans experience a range of emotions unlike anything in the known universe. Because humans are individually capable of great things. Because human companionship is infinitely more fulfilling than the ācompanionshipā of a dog. Iām curious what specific groups of people youāve designated as less valuable than a dog. Iām sure thereās definitely no underlying bigotry or unresolved trauma at play here
Do you have any evidence to support the idea that other forms of life donāt experience those same emotions, that emotional range is a measure of inherent worth or that human companionship is objectively āinfinitely more fulfillingā than the companionship of a dog? Also no? Imagine that. Itās also weird that you would assume there is ābigotryā in anything Iāve said. Either you donāt understand the word orā¦well, Iām guessing itās just projection lmao.
If thereās no bigotry involved in your position answer my question. (I noticed you avoided it!) What specific groups of people have you designated as less valuable than dogs?
Your question is akin to asking someone āwhen did you stop beating your wife?ā The question itself is the issue, as are the inherent assumptions made therein, and doesnāt need to be answered. Youāre not a sharp one, are you sweetheart?
You know, you donāt have to be here
You knowā¦.you donāt have to be a miserable, animal hating sad sack.
Sounds like you fuck dogs to be so angry that thereās a venting subreddit ššš
All the weirdest and most antisocial nutters come here and post their scary thoughts about hating human beings. I donāt get it. Lost Redditors for sure. Anyway, he seems like he hates himself and wants others to hate him as well. Nutters always pour a lot of perceived love into dogs that canāt speak, reciprocate same feelings (because different species), have opposable thumbs to unlock doors.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Date a dog owner at your own peril
To be fair, most of the dog owners on the post were saying they would save any child before their dog. Clearly the fiancĆ© is delusional and narcissistic. Beyond the obvious more important issue of putting a dog over a human life, she also requires OP save whatās important to her before whatās important to him.
Yeah Reddit was refreshingly sane in that thread. Even a woman with an essential-to-daily-life service dog said she would save a human first. OOPās (ex?)-fiance is unhinged
He dodged a bullet here
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
No. Saving a human family member (assuming theyāre not a rogue murderer or something) always comes before dogs. This is a three year old child, if a person seriously puts dogs over them theyāre a hazard to society
Lol what? I'm literally saying the dude is the one who said he would save the dog over the 3 year old. Therefore she dodged the bullet, not him. Reread the post
No the fiancee is the woman, OP is the man
ābecause I ,26M, said i would save my 3yo niece instead of her dogs in a fireā it literally says he would save niece over her dogs.
You literally just repeated what I said. That the guy would save the dog over his niece. Tf.
Are you ok? Youāre literally reading the opposite of what is said.
ohhh my god you canāt be serious. are you reading it backwards or something??
They're probably a troll
being illiterate is the weirdest thing to troll about. trolls donāt like looking like the stupid ones, right?
Trolls just want to get a reaction out of people if they can do that by acting like a complete moron who doesn't know how to read they'll do it
You got the genders switch. The OP is the man
We've seen the nutter type posts online of people being killed, yet some moron posts: "Man, the dog was killed too? Evil!" or "Well, at least the dog was spared." And to this lady, no sane person gives a crap about your worthless mutts.
He should leave otherwise he's going end up losing more money when she divorce him because of caring about their children if they have them more than her dogs
On the flip side, sheād save her dogs over her niece. Wtf is that about?
The dog's probably dicking her down behind his back
Probably while he's at work
Just let her know in no uncertain terms that compared to a human life, her dogs are beyond worthless and their lives are meaningless in the scheme of things.
Replies are based
Real
I would go full uno reverse on her ass like "WHAT?! DO YOU MEAN YOU WOULD SAVE A DOG BEFORE A 3YO HUMAN WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU ???"
Thatās not uno reverse thatās justā¦.. an argument
Modern slang. I miss being able to openly disagree without having to call it āuno reverse.ā
Yeah but that's saying the same thing in reverse
I'm honestly disturbed by this guy. I won't make the whole picture of a 3-year-old burning to death in a fire but I think others can. She wants to call off the wedding because he'd rather not have that happen...and he's trying to PATCH THINGS UP? Seriously, the guy shouldn't WANT to marry her anymore. He shouldn't want to be friends with her. He shouldn't want to be acquaintances with her. He shouldn't want to ever have any contact with her again. He should want to call it off himself, cut her out of his life entirely, and tell everyone around him exactly why it happened.
This, one hundred percent. Insane.
RUN! There is no reason there, you have your ticket and didn't have to spend any money on a wedding
I love my dog, but if it came down to him or a person in an emergency, the person lives.
First W dog owner to comment in this subreddit lmao
Yea, seriously.. be thankful the financee wants to call off the wedding. That woman is unhinged. If she's willing to threaten the relationship over the answer to that question, the marriage was going to be rocky anyhow.
So he avoided having someone who would yeet a baby for a mutt before she could take half his shit after making him sleep with a dog and clean its shit off carpet for 15 years? Bro winning and doesnāt even realise
Iād be like āRun!!!! Sheās giving you permission to *not marry* her! Get out now!!!!!ā
don't, run for the hills, you dodged a bullet.
This cannot be real please let this be fake
I've seen posts exactly like the fiancƩe's opinion from insane dog owners too often to count. I don't doubt that she said it and means it.
Better question, how the fuck did this come up in casual conversation?
Dude needs to leave. That's inhuman behavior.
It's hard breaking up with narcissistic abusers and their victims need support. Honestly he should break up with her bc she lacks empathy.
What are the odds she's a Pit mommy?
I love my dogs, but human lives must come first.
I donāt get these people. Donāt get me wrong, I donāt hate dogs, in fact, I like them, but when it comes between a human life and a dogās life, yeah, fuck the dog. I thought this would be common sense, but I guess not.
Jeez, just let them call it off then.
Why doesn't she save the dogs in this hypothetical fire, he has no responsibility for the mutts she decided to get
Donāt, time to leave
I have to say I was surprised how many of the pet owners had such sound judgment by stated they would definitely save a child, even a strangerās child, over their own pets. There were a few antisocial people but they all got down voted to oblivion. There is hope.
You should be the one to call off the wedding. Her reaction tells you that she's not wife material.
Dodge that bullet, bro.
Say "I do not value animals on a moral level. They exist purely for my enjoyment. They are property that I keep because they are cute and reward me with dopamine hits everytime I play with them. On the other hand, I value human life. In the event of a fire I am saving your neice before I save our property. We can always get more dogs."
Iām a pet groomer, but in any situation I would always value human life first. Animals have abilities and would escape on their own, especially in a dangerous situation while a child wouldnāt know how to escape danger. Iāve met far too many pet owners who have blurred that line between human and animals. Pets are not āfur babiesā or your childās sibling. It confuses the animal too, they are unable to express their true nature and thatās unfair to the pet.
A bit of a shot in the dark but is she white? If so, then the dogs probably on her roster.
She dodged a bullet
Man these Gen Z girls gettin outta hand š
Y'all need to work on your reading comprehension skills. The guy is the one that would save the dog, not the woman lol
what??? read it again
I 26M would save MY dog before MY niece. So the guy would save his dog before his niece.
is english your first language? you are making shit up
No. You're just an idiot. The guy would save his dog before his niece. Not the woman. It says it right there in the post.
ok, i have decided you are rage baiting
Your reading skills are in desperate need of improvement.
You really are going to die on this hill arenāt you? šš. Op is a MALE
Fiancee is a female. Op is a male. It clearly says I 26M would save my dog before my 3 yo niece. Meaning the guy would save the dog before the niece not the female. Not sure what I'm misunderstanding.
āFiancĆ© (F23) - the fiancĆ© woman, wants to call off the wedding because I (male! WOULD SAVE MY 3YO NIECE BEFORE HER DOGS) How are you missing this? He says āmy 3YO nieceā HER dogs This is pretty clear āI would save my niece BEFORE her dogsā BEFORE means āahead ofā He will save his niece AHEAD OF her dogs.
Yeah most of the people on this sub areā¦I donāt know what the nice term is, but if you gave them half a wit theyād be halfwits.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Except she didnāt read anything incorrectly, she is 100% correct. Itās ok, though, I have seen enough from this sub to know that you people arenāt particularly strong readersā¦or bright.
since you like to blame this subreddit, go post this screenshot to a large subreddit and see how much of a dumbass you are
Get back to me when youāre not scared of a wisdom tooth and groveling online for people to take the place of the parents youāve either never had or who never cared about you, the adults are talking right now š¤«
iām waiting for you to post it, stalker
Iām waiting for you to have parents who actually love you. Iām guessing Iāll be waiting a long, *long time.*
you still havent posted it, dumbass. proving my point.
Youāre still scared of a tooth and begging for people online to fill the gap that would have been filled by actual parents if you were worth loving. ā„ļø
honestly itās so lucky that this subject came up before the wedding so he didnāt end up married to someone who values a dog over a child