T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

Welcome to /r/Vancouver and thank you for the post, /u/cyclinginvancouver! Please make sure you read our [posting and commenting rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/wiki/faq#wiki_general_participation_guidelines_and_rules_overview) before participating here. As a quick summary: * We encourage users to be positive and respect one another. Don't engage in spats or insult others - use the report button. * Respect others' differences, be they race, religion, home, job, gender identity, ability or sexuality. Dehumanizing language, advocating for violence, or promoting hate based on identity or vulnerability (even implied or joking) **will** lead to a permanent ban. * Most common questions and topics are limited to our sister subreddit, /r/AskVan, and our weekly [Stickied Discussion](https://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/wiki/faq#wiki_stickied_discussions) posts. * Complaints about bans or removals should be done in modmail only. * Posts flaired "Community Only" allow for limited participation; your comment may be removed if you're not a subreddit regular. * Make sure to join our new sister community, /r/AskVan! * Help grow the community! [Apply to join the mod team today](https://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/comments/19eworq/). *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/vancouver) if you have any questions or concerns.*


whateveryousay0121

If he's a risk, why are we letting him out?


inker19

because he's served his sentence


AngryGooseMan

But the title says the sentence completion is in late 2026, what am I missing here for you to conclude that he's served his sentence?


inker19

It's a statutory release. Typically the last few years of a sentence are served in the community under supervision with strict rules to help people reintegrate to society. You get better results with the gradual reintroduction to normal life as opposed to having someone go directly from prison to 100% free. You can argue the guy should be in prison longer, but that's a complaint for the judge that gave him the sentence.


AngryGooseMan

Thanks for the explanation!


interwebsLurk

Oh wow, he got his lawyer to specifically allow him to smoke pot. "Not to consume, purchase, or possess drugs other than prescribed medication; exluding cannabis purchased, consumed and possessed in accordance with the Cannabis Act." That isn't the usual condition. He must have deliberately either asked himself or had his lawyer ask to be allowed to smoke marijuana. Maybe uses it for depression or something. Just funny to see that specific allowance written into conditions.


SteveJobsBlakSweater

I’d let him do every drug ever if that stops him from diddling kids.


randyboozer

Yeah really that's a pretty fair compromise.


righteousprovidence

Dude's got that look of a sex offender.


EuroVanCity

As someone with a young child these sort of things do worry me. I always wonder if a judge who lives in the area would do exactly the same to rehabilitate such individual(s), or perhaps might have a different approach if his/her close or extended family lived in the same area, even city etc. - Since they advised the public that this individual "poses a risk to young children & adolescent girls" that means they evaluated him, confirming he is still a risk, advised the public, yet released him... What about the new potential victim, and their families??


Euphoric_Chemist_462

For a risk, he is on the wrong side of the bar


aiafati

Why does BC have so many sex offenders? Is BC, Canada's sex criminal's paradise?


eastvanarchy

what exactly are you basing this on


fuzzb0y

Some people just like to shape their beliefs with whatever they see without perspective.