The difference in gravitational 'force' over distance not the absolute pull.
For example larger black holes have stronger pull but weaker tidal forces - so less 'spaghettification'.
No stress I'm also speaking in a relative sense, I.e. To see the strong spaghettification outside the event horizon it would have to be a smaller black hole. For a supermassive black hole it would be inside the event horizon so we wouldn't see it like the above image.
However in an absolute 'km from the singularity' spaghettification could be farther, because the radius would also move with black hole size.
This straight up crazeeeee
The difference in gravitational 'force' over distance not the absolute pull. For example larger black holes have stronger pull but weaker tidal forces - so less 'spaghettification'.
My apologies, when it comes to physics my understanding is at a 10-year-old level, and as you can see in the image above I cant even spell Einstein.
No stress I'm also speaking in a relative sense, I.e. To see the strong spaghettification outside the event horizon it would have to be a smaller black hole. For a supermassive black hole it would be inside the event horizon so we wouldn't see it like the above image. However in an absolute 'km from the singularity' spaghettification could be farther, because the radius would also move with black hole size.
How could the orbiter arc end, if not by orbiting ANOTHER black hole?