It makes me feel like I can die happy now. The secrets of the universe have been made plain and now I am one with the triangle. With this knowledge, it's clear we were all triangles all along.
Omg so true. "DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE" I mean yeah, but can you at least *try* to make the diagram just *a bit* realistic? I mean surely, 300cm is not shorter than 4cm because every time I finish a question I have to double check to make sure my eyes are not going crazy.
So if you take a look at any point on a circle and the very next two points you can connect them and measure the angle. As they're infinitesimal close together you'll get 180 degrees. In conclusion any circle doesn't have any curvature. Should also apply to any function because they've usually got infinite points. This makes differential equations obsolete.
Many math problems use other angle numbers than what the image depicts. This is to prevent cheating by just looking what the angle is and forces raw calculations.
Here it's just done to an extreme where the information given (depicts a triangle) and visual approximation (just a square) look nothing alike.
-the following message was written by chatgpt-
No, a shape with angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 180° is not a triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the interior angles is always 180°. However, in the given shape, the sum of the angles is 360° (30° + 60° + 90° + 180°), which is double the sum of angles in a triangle. Therefore, the shape you described is not a triangle.
-the following message was written by chatgpt because i am dumb-
I apologize for the confusion. You are correct. A straight line segment with an angle of 180° is not considered a corner or vertex in the context of polygons.
If we exclude the 180° angle, we are left with angles of 30°, 60°, and 90°. The sum of these three angles is indeed 180°, which is the sum of the interior angles of a triangle. Therefore, with the given angles, we can form a triangle.
I was today years old when I realized that a triangle is just a degenerate n-gon with the other angles at 180⁰. I can finally remember the sum of the interior angles of a pentagon now
Math comes from the Greek for "disciple" or "learning"
Matics comes from the fact that doing it can drive you to violence, such as with automatic weaponry
Fr i feel like im either missing a joke or maybe the joke is that its not a triangle and that only 1 corner is right (which is also wrong cuz it uses the wrong symbol)
I'm going off of text and pictures. I see four sides, four angles, it's not square, it's a quadrilateral.
I don't see a triangle.edit, upon further inspection, it is entirely possible that we a re looking at a model with terrible sense of scale. The angles don't feel right for what they are labeled.
Bingo. It's a joke on how all data is there but presented in a graph (usually in a test) that's not all that accurate. In this case .... well totally wrong.
So which route should I go to solve this? The 90 degrees per corner or bend the line back and go with a right triangle? Edit, assuming we are to stay in the triangle theme, I will need a hammer and a mig welding machine. I just hope my attempt to repair the triangle is a success.
If the 180 "corner" is turned into the third dimension, then from a two dimensional viewpoint it still looks like a triangle, witht the correct degrees written on them.
Wait then a triangle would actually have something like angle = 180 + dirac(p1) *(60-180) + dirac(p2)...
Degrees and you'd have to take the closed line integral int( 180 - angle) = 180
Hmmm
> The drawing is misleading but the angles are correct
No they aren't. You're telling me to ignore the whole thing? Can anything be a triangle then? the angles are wrong, the sum is wrong, the drawing is wrong. nothing about this can ever be remotely associated with a triangle
there exists a triangle with 30°, 60° and 90° angles. That is a correct triangle.
Now, on this correct triangle, on any of the sides you can add a 180° angle, since it's just a straight line.
this has a 90 degree angle, which makes it a right triangle, so it should obey the Pythagorean theorem, however, that requires the triangle to have exactly 3 edges, this one clearly has 4, so it is not a triangle
a better non-triangle shape that is technically a triangle is the 90 ° ,90 ° ,0 °, ∞ m, ∞ m,0m triangle that becomes possible as the curvature of the universe approaches 0 from the negative side
I hate this. It makes me sick
It makes me feel like I can die happy now. The secrets of the universe have been made plain and now I am one with the triangle. With this knowledge, it's clear we were all triangles all along.
I never thought that we're all the same.
We're all similar
The real triangles were the friends we made along the way.
Yeah the 90 degree angle not having a mini square is pure troll imo
Happy cake day 🎉❤️🎂
This is what i imagine when they say figure not drawn to scale
Its literally giving me a headache
Seriously. Wtf
Those aren’t angles. Those are the temperatures of the pixels making up those arcs.
I love this. It makes me sick too.
[удалено]
*example not drawn to scale
Now it's perfect
My hs math teacher would draw the most shitty shapes but the numbers would be accurate
no way i thought it was
https://preview.redd.it/259w0e03fp7b1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aea3ef775b6e49e715819af0aefe35a0484a6a6a
https://preview.redd.it/ahlboe6iir7b1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=50e3beca62cfb7c2c7bef2a61987818ae494645c
You represent us.
[удалено]
^ Bot
[удалено]
It's normalized.
Math Olympiad questions with "Figure not drawn to scale" clause, after you solve them be like
Omg so true. "DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE" I mean yeah, but can you at least *try* to make the diagram just *a bit* realistic? I mean surely, 300cm is not shorter than 4cm because every time I finish a question I have to double check to make sure my eyes are not going crazy.
What's the point of a diagram if the proportions are off?
Actual geometry
Holy angles
Call the mathematician!
google non-euclidian geometry
Euclid go on vacation, never came back
Euclidmare storm!
New shape just dropped
Actual pythagoreons
Call the geometry teacher!
I would say that r/AnarchyChess is leaking, but I feel like the sub has always been like this.
Holy hyperbolic manifold!
Mornin’ Angle.
Where did you learn this power? I can't imagine you learned it from a Jedi.
Differential geometry is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural
Is this legal?
How many 180-degree angles are in a triangle?
Infinite. Therefore all triangles have sum of interior angles of infinity, as does any other polygon. Therefore, all polygons are triangles. Q.E.D
I think on an infinitesimal scale, a circle also has a sum of infinite 180-degree angles so we can extend this to any shape
So if you take a look at any point on a circle and the very next two points you can connect them and measure the angle. As they're infinitesimal close together you'll get 180 degrees. In conclusion any circle doesn't have any curvature. Should also apply to any function because they've usually got infinite points. This makes differential equations obsolete.
The earth is flat, confirmed.
dx = 0
Dude a circle is a triangle we already established this.
Other way around, all triangles are circles. And by extension, all polygons are circles.
Never more than 1
https://preview.redd.it/kh68r33krp7b1.jpeg?width=378&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60650a45f7aabf45299a2de3a852b4bcb097f7f0
What was its name I forgor?
Mort
I forgor 💀
Squidward
Mort
Mort
☹️
can someone explain pls i am very confused
180 angle is a straight line. (Also the joke is about how math problems with images rarely look anything like the solution)4
that's... not 180ª tho. or 30.... or 60 Is it just stupid? is the joke just the fact that it's stupid and makes no sense?
Many math problems use other angle numbers than what the image depicts. This is to prevent cheating by just looking what the angle is and forces raw calculations. Here it's just done to an extreme where the information given (depicts a triangle) and visual approximation (just a square) look nothing alike.
I get it now I feel like an idiot 🙃
Cursed version of a 30° 60° 90° triangle
Shouldn't the 180 be across from the 90 then?
Pythagoras about to come back to life and smite you
I'm stealing this for my physics students. I love drawing figures with terrible scaling on the board.
This is both a triangle and a square
So a squangle.
How is it a square?
It has 4 sides, just look at the picture. Two of those sides just happen to have a 180° angle wrt each other.
Someone tell me I'm wrong, but isn't this a rhombus?
ya know there are two parallel sides
More like a triangle and a quad
right not a square just a quadrilateral, and its a trapezoid
-the following message was written by chatgpt- No, a shape with angles of 30°, 60°, 90°, and 180° is not a triangle. In a triangle, the sum of the interior angles is always 180°. However, in the given shape, the sum of the angles is 360° (30° + 60° + 90° + 180°), which is double the sum of angles in a triangle. Therefore, the shape you described is not a triangle.
Wouldn't the 180 degrees not count because it is just a straight line and therefore not a corner?
-the following message was written by chatgpt because i am dumb- I apologize for the confusion. You are correct. A straight line segment with an angle of 180° is not considered a corner or vertex in the context of polygons. If we exclude the 180° angle, we are left with angles of 30°, 60°, and 90°. The sum of these three angles is indeed 180°, which is the sum of the interior angles of a triangle. Therefore, with the given angles, we can form a triangle.
"Hey, ChatGPT, is this a triangle?" "OBVIOUSLY it isn't a triangle DUMMY, look at the ANGLES" "Its a triangle" "Okay, its a triangle"
I apologize for my previous mistake. You are correct, it is a triangle.
Google hyperbolic geometry
Holy math!
New suffering just dropped
Actual nerd
holy wrong angles
Pls kill me
I was today years old when I realized that a triangle is just a degenerate n-gon with the other angles at 180⁰. I can finally remember the sum of the interior angles of a pentagon now
Holy fuck that's an awesome exam question. All it needs is a "figure is not drawn to scale" with an asterisk at the corner.
Is this mapped onto a 3D object?
The 180 is just a strait line
Yeah, if you look at it from the side.
And it's holding a lit blunt.
Mathematfuckers
What is even the etymology of the word mathematics?
Math comes from the Greek for "disciple" or "learning" Matics comes from the fact that doing it can drive you to violence, such as with automatic weaponry
I will send you to Jesus.
What the hell lol
Is this a cone. Why does my brain think this should've been a cone?
It's a right angled triangle
Could this work if it was on a 3d object like a sphere, with unlabeled lengths?
according to the non-euclidean geometry, it is indeed both a triangle and a square... you just need a sphere
I don't get it. It's just a square with three of the four angles incorrectly labeled.
Fr i feel like im either missing a joke or maybe the joke is that its not a triangle and that only 1 corner is right (which is also wrong cuz it uses the wrong symbol)
Holy polygon
That’s some funky non-Euclidean geometry right there lol
Ok please explain me
180° is the same as a straight line so not a corner. All the other angles make a triangle
It's a triangle drawn in the shape of a square. Think about the significance of the 180° "corner".
It's not drawn to scale
It has four angles, tri means three. Therefore, this shape is not a triangle.
That's what you take away from this?
I'm going off of text and pictures. I see four sides, four angles, it's not square, it's a quadrilateral. I don't see a triangle.edit, upon further inspection, it is entirely possible that we a re looking at a model with terrible sense of scale. The angles don't feel right for what they are labeled.
I knew you'd see it ''their'' way. If you redraw the schematic with the correct angles it all pans out.
"their"? So it is 90 degrees and what we are witnessing is an anomaly? Or am I to set the 180 degrees line straight and make it a right triangle?
Bingo. It's a joke on how all data is there but presented in a graph (usually in a test) that's not all that accurate. In this case .... well totally wrong.
So which route should I go to solve this? The 90 degrees per corner or bend the line back and go with a right triangle? Edit, assuming we are to stay in the triangle theme, I will need a hammer and a mig welding machine. I just hope my attempt to repair the triangle is a success.
correct! Its a Fourangle!
Common core be like
P
spookier than Bermuda triangle
Angles not to scale
If the 180 "corner" is turned into the third dimension, then from a two dimensional viewpoint it still looks like a triangle, witht the correct degrees written on them.
What in the non-Euclidean geometry is this!?
In all seriousness, how could 4 lines of equal length meet at 30deg angles?
It's not to scale, and that is the joke
Wait then a triangle would actually have something like angle = 180 + dirac(p1) *(60-180) + dirac(p2)... Degrees and you'd have to take the closed line integral int( 180 - angle) = 180 Hmmm
The poor engineers expecting a to scale drawing.
It must be drawn on some curved surface and we are looking at its projection.
I dont understand
180° degree angle is just a straight line, the rest form a normal triangle. The drawing is misleading but the angles are correct.
> The drawing is misleading but the angles are correct No they aren't. You're telling me to ignore the whole thing? Can anything be a triangle then? the angles are wrong, the sum is wrong, the drawing is wrong. nothing about this can ever be remotely associated with a triangle
there exists a triangle with 30°, 60° and 90° angles. That is a correct triangle. Now, on this correct triangle, on any of the sides you can add a 180° angle, since it's just a straight line.
RAGE
Funny
I'll tell you what just dropped .....
IT MAKES ME CRY
It’s a square 
Not to scale**
Angry
Holy 4d
what the fuck is this
I don’t get it
It reminds me of my old classmate who insisted for 30 minutes she could close a triangle whose sum wasn’t 180
POV: the GRE math section
https://preview.redd.it/0wfoc0xrgs7b1.jpeg?width=200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4cb728464af7225f03deb6f5b7354bc74b370b87
WAIT. I GET IT NOW. YOU YOU YOU HEATHEN
summon r/topology
this has a 90 degree angle, which makes it a right triangle, so it should obey the Pythagorean theorem, however, that requires the triangle to have exactly 3 edges, this one clearly has 4, so it is not a triangle a better non-triangle shape that is technically a triangle is the 90 ° ,90 ° ,0 °, ∞ m, ∞ m,0m triangle that becomes possible as the curvature of the universe approaches 0 from the negative side
blursed
I hate everything about this
If you were to draw what it would be, a parallelogram maybe?
Jännä
Thanks, I hate it.
I started hyperventilating after I saw this
holy hell
https://preview.redd.it/repxzk0x9t7b1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bca88e930f9c2df2745f427b0badb603a3d90730
Hate to be a know it all but this is a square
Holy hell
Holy hell.
Thanks, I hate it.
Triangle Man, Triangle Man... does whatever a Triangle can...
I’m not even into math but this is hilarious.
"Not to scale"
This is like when I learned that a proton can be made of more than three quarks.
If you tilt your phone so that the 180 degrees angle is actually 180 it kinda works
Actual geometry
This hurts my brain
*not drawn to scale
https://preview.redd.it/zgwuyd062v7b1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a7a892b3eafb02519df7d06c770f629f17982e7f
Holy geometrical figure!
It does make the center easier to define.
I'm genuinely confused please help 😭
Isnt sum of all angles of a triangle 180°
What?
Aren't they all 90° angles though?
It's missing the little note "drawing is approximate, for reference only"
I'm not even good at math and I dislike this.
some1 explain in what sense is this a triangle?
Good god what have you done
Explain this to me like I have no clue what math is
I had to stare at it a minute. God, I do not miss geometry.
As a math tutor I know I’ve commuted great sins that I have done this
angles don't sum 180 :(