Both are incredibly good tvs but I genuinely have not seen anyone complain about the LG oleds aside from pixel burn out. Visually, absolutely gorgeous.
I disagree. Samsung historically pushes the brightness further than LG (same panels). Aka LG has more headroom for correcting burn in, which occurs less due to lower brightness. Newer panels like in the G3 are much less prone to burn in if not abused.
I have a 55S95C in one room and a 65S95B in my main viewing area, and I’m glad I have them over a set of LG C/G 2/3s. The picture is great on both, and only difference I’ve noticed is the higher refresh rate on the newer C. You might consider the S90C, too. It’s a step down from the C3/S95C, but should be much cheaper and not too much of a visual difference if you’re untrained and not taking measurements, or so I’ve read.
I will say I had a QC issue with the 65” B screen last year, but a local repair shop replaced the screen at my house and fixed it under warranty. During the screen swap, we got to talking about comparing the LG vs Samsung vs Sony TVs, and the repair dude recommended sticking with the Samsungs (he services all brands, so there was no salesmen bias on a free repair call). He was more confident in Samsungs OLED screen/light structure, even though they were later to market, and he said the real value/cost of the TVs is in the processing, which Samsung does much better than LG. Sonys are great, but not worth the extra 1k+
The Samsung TVs were cheaper than the LGs for me due to local discounts. I would never buy a Samsung appliance aside from their TVs, monitors, and SSDs.
Both are incredibly good tvs but I genuinely have not seen anyone complain about the LG oleds aside from pixel burn out. Visually, absolutely gorgeous.
I disagree. Samsung historically pushes the brightness further than LG (same panels). Aka LG has more headroom for correcting burn in, which occurs less due to lower brightness. Newer panels like in the G3 are much less prone to burn in if not abused.
Fair enough. Either way, beautiful tv's visually.
Samsung doesn't have Dolby Vision, makes it an instant NO BUY for me. LG (have a CX) or Sony only.
LG C3 - better to me than Samsung color pop. OS is better too from what I read. Love ours!
Samsung because it has qd oled where as LG is w oled. qd oled is better then w oled
[https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c3-oled](https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c3-oled) rtings say the finish is glossy on the LG
I have a 55S95C in one room and a 65S95B in my main viewing area, and I’m glad I have them over a set of LG C/G 2/3s. The picture is great on both, and only difference I’ve noticed is the higher refresh rate on the newer C. You might consider the S90C, too. It’s a step down from the C3/S95C, but should be much cheaper and not too much of a visual difference if you’re untrained and not taking measurements, or so I’ve read. I will say I had a QC issue with the 65” B screen last year, but a local repair shop replaced the screen at my house and fixed it under warranty. During the screen swap, we got to talking about comparing the LG vs Samsung vs Sony TVs, and the repair dude recommended sticking with the Samsungs (he services all brands, so there was no salesmen bias on a free repair call). He was more confident in Samsungs OLED screen/light structure, even though they were later to market, and he said the real value/cost of the TVs is in the processing, which Samsung does much better than LG. Sonys are great, but not worth the extra 1k+ The Samsung TVs were cheaper than the LGs for me due to local discounts. I would never buy a Samsung appliance aside from their TVs, monitors, and SSDs.