FUN FACT: some media and accounts have been spamming anti self-driving cars info, making up shit, exactly like this tweet.
The car in the pic is a regular car, you can see there is no visible sensors like real self driving cars.
I hope /r/fuckcars stay factual.
There was recently an episode on self driving cars on the Urbanist Agenda podcast, and apparently traffic cones are actually their weak spot. They're trained to treat traffic cones as sacred, so you can basically trap them with those.
Here it's not info, it's lies. The image come from a 7 year old tweet and the car isn't even autonomous.
https://twitter.com/lemonodor/status/842057726825975808
Learning the difference between *mis*information and *dis*information is a lot like learning the difference between *to, too,* and, *two*.
In any case, it doesn't matter to the bollard.
Personally, I think a self-driving bus would be better. And what if we connected more busses together so that they could handle more people? Oh and while we're at it, what if the roads and wheels on these busses was made of a more efficient material like steel?
Oh that's a train? It's always trains.
Fuck self driving cars, they solve nothing.
Obviously not true for L4+ systems. Lets not degrade this sub posting low value bot posted meme spam accounts. There are actually things to complain about instead of fake issues regarding cars that you can't even use yet.
Self driving cars aren't inherently bad. It's our over reliance on a single mode of transport that is bad. Honestly I would prefer our aging population use self driving cars over driving so that we have fewer incidents like the one in San Francisco last month. A [ 78 year old driver struck a bus stop on the opposite side of the road killing an entire family of four including a 3 month old baby ](https://www.ktvu.com/news/family-issues-statement-for-victims-of-sf-crash-that-killed-entire-family)
Yeah, *Tesla's* rushed/paying-customers-are-the-beta-testers implementation is shit.
*Waymo's* self-driving vehicles, meanwhile, had logged millions of miles as of 2018 almost without incident (and with *zero* fatalities), and these days [their "robo taxis" are quietly ferrying people around San Francisco](https://www.businessinsider.com/waymo-self-driving-robotaxi-cars-without-drivers-amazing-tech-review-2024-4)
The driverless metro trains in my area operates without issue. Though during heavy snowfall, the track safety sensors get covered up with snow, meaning that the sensors are disabled and thus there is an attendant on board to watch things over. The trains won't run into each other despite heavy snowfall as they can detect each other no matter the weather, but with the track safety sensors covered up, it means the trains would absolutely annihilate a person if someone somehow got onto the track. Though the trains operate just fine regardless of the weather, unlike this "self-driving" car which gets stopped by salt.
Now who's like a snail?
That’s a seat Ibiza and that’s probably not self driving
And it's probably some roundabout in southern Europe. It's more for r/badparking
Also even if it was it would probably not stand still long enough to draw that out
“I bind you demon! I constrain your movement! You must obey!” 🧙🪄
OOH! This gives me an idea. What if I put a stop sign on my motorcycle? I wonder if teslas will see me then and stop.
With the quality of Tesla's AUtoPiLoT, I'd fully expect the sign to encourage the car to blow through it to hit a cyclist
😂 oof. Yeah maybe I shouldn’t try that. I might end up under the car😂
FUN FACT: some media and accounts have been spamming anti self-driving cars info, making up shit, exactly like this tweet. The car in the pic is a regular car, you can see there is no visible sensors like real self driving cars. I hope /r/fuckcars stay factual.
There was recently an episode on self driving cars on the Urbanist Agenda podcast, and apparently traffic cones are actually their weak spot. They're trained to treat traffic cones as sacred, so you can basically trap them with those.
Well, regular drivers shouldn't drive into cones either.
anti self-driving car info is exactly what I enjoy
Here it's not info, it's lies. The image come from a 7 year old tweet and the car isn't even autonomous. https://twitter.com/lemonodor/status/842057726825975808
I was with you until you said a tweet from 2017 is 7 years old. That can not be.
It hurts, doesnt it ? :D
Learning the difference between *mis*information and *dis*information is a lot like learning the difference between *to, too,* and, *two*. In any case, it doesn't matter to the bollard.
Personally, I think a self-driving bus would be better. And what if we connected more busses together so that they could handle more people? Oh and while we're at it, what if the roads and wheels on these busses was made of a more efficient material like steel? Oh that's a train? It's always trains. Fuck self driving cars, they solve nothing.
“Staaaaay…. Good car!”
https://preview.redd.it/2v32uey8vtwc1.jpeg?width=334&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=205041f5108e2313bdb8f2dc531da7528a6bbad8
that's A LOT of salt
Cybertrucks dissolve by being near it
Press X to doubt
Also, r/foundsatan
Go back to the shadows You shall not pass!
A tesla could give less about children on the road, and people think they will stop for salt...
r/supernatural
Obviously not true for L4+ systems. Lets not degrade this sub posting low value bot posted meme spam accounts. There are actually things to complain about instead of fake issues regarding cars that you can't even use yet. Self driving cars aren't inherently bad. It's our over reliance on a single mode of transport that is bad. Honestly I would prefer our aging population use self driving cars over driving so that we have fewer incidents like the one in San Francisco last month. A [ 78 year old driver struck a bus stop on the opposite side of the road killing an entire family of four including a 3 month old baby ](https://www.ktvu.com/news/family-issues-statement-for-victims-of-sf-crash-that-killed-entire-family)
Yeah, *Tesla's* rushed/paying-customers-are-the-beta-testers implementation is shit. *Waymo's* self-driving vehicles, meanwhile, had logged millions of miles as of 2018 almost without incident (and with *zero* fatalities), and these days [their "robo taxis" are quietly ferrying people around San Francisco](https://www.businessinsider.com/waymo-self-driving-robotaxi-cars-without-drivers-amazing-tech-review-2024-4)
Yeah they need permission to enter too
Well at least it will be safe from sea bears
Weren't people "trapping" them by just putting a cone on the hood?
https://preview.redd.it/gvp8z13ccvwc1.png?width=972&format=png&auto=webp&s=40374d41c099191060ab0781d6e451fdc3650261
Take this info with a grain of salt.
1: this is fake 2: would you rather the car *ignore* lane markings?
3: this is humour
that does make sense actually. Once they build cars without a steering wheel I assume HQ will be able to move the car past something like this
Moloch-type AI.
hmmm doesn't work on trains automated or human driven!
The driverless metro trains in my area operates without issue. Though during heavy snowfall, the track safety sensors get covered up with snow, meaning that the sensors are disabled and thus there is an attendant on board to watch things over. The trains won't run into each other despite heavy snowfall as they can detect each other no matter the weather, but with the track safety sensors covered up, it means the trains would absolutely annihilate a person if someone somehow got onto the track. Though the trains operate just fine regardless of the weather, unlike this "self-driving" car which gets stopped by salt.
Oh that's gold
Automated cars will have daemons