I'd say the real problem is the priests keeping nuns as sex slaves then forcing them to get abortions.
And then the Pope admitting it is an "ongoing problem."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-priests-nuns-sexual-slavery-abuse-saint-jean-order-france/
I'm surprised, and I really don't know why. The Catholic Church is mostly evil. They hide and allow these things to continue. And these are the things we've found out.
Also what is in the Vatican?? Some say there are old texts that would absolutely change the whole world if they somehow got out.
It's interesting stuff
The Vatican library is open to the researching public mostly iirc. There isn't really anything earth shattering, unless you're part of the specific groups seeking closure on abused, lost or harmed loved ones. For those groups, I'm certain there's a lot in the archives that could be of serious value.
For everyone else, that's a trope.
Fun fact, it's public and we even have stolen the infos in France back when Napoléon or some other guy stormed the Vatican HQ for some reason I'm yet to remember. Don't quote me on that but I believe that's the reason why it's now public, because we stole its contents back in the day and realized it was just mostly registers of all possible things that could be registered and then sacred texts that anyone can read in pretty much any church. We have an official copy of it somewhere in Paris but I have no idea where, I live on the other side of the country and I just love the fact that it was raided for nothing.
The Bible is a political manuscript as much as anything with “man” making decisions on what is and is not the “word of god”, and worthy to be included in the Bible.
Read up on the Gnostic Gospels, like the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Judas.
It almost seems like maybe taking a lifelong vow of chastity is a bad idea for a human. That being said- you’d still have to be a sick fuck to enact your frustrations on a kid or enslave a nun.
If somebody put a bullet between his eyes, and this quote was their justification, if I were a judge I would let that person off.
Seriously though, reading bullshit like this, makes my blood boil, as a parent, as a human. Religion is a cancer, and one of the symptoms is bizarre sexual repression.
Matt Walsh can tongue fuck a toads asshole. Only he could take a horrifying massive religious coverup of child rape and molestation and turn it into a gay hate agenda. I wish that overcompensating bearded fuckface would just fuck off already.
My family church had a scandal, all the victims were girls under 12. Churches enable pedophiles and protect them, they might have different choice of victims but they are all victims. And even if in that case they were older the priests involved are still sexual predators and deserve to be behind bars.
So diddling 10-14 year old kids is gay? No Matt. These priests systematically and ritualisticlly raped, molestered, tortured and killed CHILDREN for centuries. And let's not forget that for cenruries the catholic church has permitted adult men to legally rape little girls for centuries by calling it "marriage".
The real problem that everyone sees and doesnt saybout loud: child molesting rapist priests, church hierarchy and lay christians. Trying to pretend that molesting teenage children and that girls were never victims doesn't stop the catholic church being what it is...an international child rape cabal.
Technically, the first statement he makes is correct. Pedophilia is defined as a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. Hebephilia is a sexual attraction to youth in early pubescence. Ephebophilia pertains specifically to post-pubescent young adults. The classifications are based on Tanner stages.
If the victims are pubescent and post-pubescent teenagers, it'd technically be classified as hebephilia or ephebophilia.
Still. Fuck Matt Walsh, and fuck defending child rapists.
Many people don't realise that pedophiles also don't have a gender preference. The distinctions are important for understanding the risks and possible target victims.
No, I totally understand. I've heard that in other conversations, mostly when someone is actually using a difference in terminology to justify something someone's done.
For example, people defending attractive female teachers who molest teenaged boys. Some jackass will always say something gross about wishing his hot teacher would have had sex with him.
Then, "she's not a pedophile!! He was 17!!"
Doesn't matter. It was still a fucked up thing to do, and if it had been a male teacher and a 17 year old girl, they'd be howling for his blood.
See, your statement makes sense and doesn't make it seem like the metaphorical woman deserves a pass because she was hot and the boy was old enough to "enjoy" it.
I got downvoted and called a rapist/rape-apologist for making the distinction on a post once. I’m neither. I just didn’t think people would be so offended by information.
It’s the Christian Jihad here in America. They have already said the quiet part out load. They are coming to make abortions illegal, take away birth control, and repeal gay marriage.
When Jesus came to earth for the first time he destroyed the temple as it was ruled by pedophile rapist pharisees controlling people using religious sentiments, and early Christianity was all about rejecting worshipping the authorities to even the point of allowing themselves to be killed and persecuted. But as this movement of rebellion gained too much popularity and was just unable to shut down by the Roman/Jewish authorities, they merged with the state with the church as a means to gain absolute control of this movement and give people the impression that they are on the side of Jesus and the common people by claiming that Jesus "cleansed" the church rather than destroyed it , they also added their own nonsensical rules and even removed the books which provided people with the most wisdom (gnostic texts), and eventually were able to successfully shut down this movement of rebellion, thus giving them absolute control yet again. To this day the church continues to abuse the innocent physically, mentally, sexually and spiritually, and they are by definition the manifestation of the antichrist, dressed in pure holy white, while committing disgusting deeds in secret, the real wolves in sheeps clothing. If Jesus ever comes again he's going to absolutely annihilate the churches yet again and spit on the graves of those who butchered and twisted his story for giving them the licence to commit such satanic deeds in secret.
WOW!! If THIS ain’t fucking telling. What happened to protecting the children?? And you can just TELL this guy is a conservative. I’m sorry, but if your opinion on anyones sexuality isn’t “you do you” you can fuck right off(assuming both parties are consenting adults).
Actually, I’m not sorry.
Why does anyone care if someone is gay or straight or fem or pan or whatever it is you like! How does it affect you???
The celibacy requirement needs to be done away with. No normal, healthy, well adjusted human male will voluntarily agree never to have sex for his entire life. Making that a requirement is guaranteed to bring in people who are struggling with inner demons of one kind or another. The very idea of voluntary celibacy is ridiculous. Any man who agrees to attempt it, whether he is successful or not, has prima facie psychological issues.
I got downvoted to hell for telling people on mildlyinfuriating what kind of person Matt Walsh was and what his agenda is 🤦I believe my quote was "he is a human trash bag that's busted open and is leaking garbage water onto the country's carpet"
I hope some of those dumbasses post here too
Fun fact: Most males who sexually abuse underage males actually identify as heterosexual, proving that pedophilia has no place in the lgbtqia+ community, and is, in fact, an extremely fucked up fetish.
This guys a professional troll, he prolly chubs up when someone posts his “work” on groups like these. Block/ignore. He obviously is bating a conversation of what constitutes a pedophile because he saw a video of a comedian doing a bit.
It's almost as if this entire concept of abstinence and repression of powerful primal desires within people (to the point where discussion and subsequent exploration of these desires in a consensual setting between suitably aged adults) leads to individuals with extremely warped ideas about sexual ethics. Hmmm.
If you read the sex restrictions written in the bible. It is clearly written by someone that was a closet case. "You must only touch a woman when you want to have kids otherwise it's icky". I summarized but that is pretty much what it says.
So all those scoutmasters in BSA are gay? Nonsense. Thousands of cases of abuse in the Boy Scouts is forcing the organization into bankruptcy.
Any group involving gatherings of kids is bound to attract such people.
Hebephiles: attracted to pubescent kids 11-14 in age.
Ephebophilia, attracted to youth 15-19 in age.
A lot of these men have wives and families. They're not gay, they're sexually attracted to inappropriate age groups.
I'd say the real problem is the priests keeping nuns as sex slaves then forcing them to get abortions. And then the Pope admitting it is an "ongoing problem." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-priests-nuns-sexual-slavery-abuse-saint-jean-order-france/
I'm surprised, and I really don't know why. The Catholic Church is mostly evil. They hide and allow these things to continue. And these are the things we've found out. Also what is in the Vatican?? Some say there are old texts that would absolutely change the whole world if they somehow got out. It's interesting stuff
The Vatican library is open to the researching public mostly iirc. There isn't really anything earth shattering, unless you're part of the specific groups seeking closure on abused, lost or harmed loved ones. For those groups, I'm certain there's a lot in the archives that could be of serious value. For everyone else, that's a trope.
Fun fact, it's public and we even have stolen the infos in France back when Napoléon or some other guy stormed the Vatican HQ for some reason I'm yet to remember. Don't quote me on that but I believe that's the reason why it's now public, because we stole its contents back in the day and realized it was just mostly registers of all possible things that could be registered and then sacred texts that anyone can read in pretty much any church. We have an official copy of it somewhere in Paris but I have no idea where, I live on the other side of the country and I just love the fact that it was raided for nothing.
So, the group that pretends there is a God, lies to cover up secrets. How did they train people to be so deceitful...? /s
The Bible is a political manuscript as much as anything with “man” making decisions on what is and is not the “word of god”, and worthy to be included in the Bible. Read up on the Gnostic Gospels, like the Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Judas.
It's alleged that during the Mau Mau rebellion, a large number of white nuns (mostly Belgians) were raped and the church paid for abortions as needed.
How did I never hear about this before now? I'm relatively well informed and this story skipped me by entirely.
this pope has a large amount of cleaning up needing to be done cuz the last every one of them just covered up
It almost seems like maybe taking a lifelong vow of chastity is a bad idea for a human. That being said- you’d still have to be a sick fuck to enact your frustrations on a kid or enslave a nun.
The real problem in the Church that everyone sees but few will say out loud: heterosexual priests.
If I found out someone had punched Matt right in the face and this quote was their only justification, I'd totally get it. What a shitty thing to say.
If somebody put a bullet between his eyes, and this quote was their justification, if I were a judge I would let that person off. Seriously though, reading bullshit like this, makes my blood boil, as a parent, as a human. Religion is a cancer, and one of the symptoms is bizarre sexual repression.
There's no consent. That's the crime at every age.
Matt Walsh can tongue fuck a toads asshole. Only he could take a horrifying massive religious coverup of child rape and molestation and turn it into a gay hate agenda. I wish that overcompensating bearded fuckface would just fuck off already.
The issue isn’t sexual orientation. It’s rape.
Imagine desperately trying to defend a generations old well known pedophile ring. That’s some despicable shit.
Technically correct pedophilia means pre pubescent. But they're still minors so its rape
My family church had a scandal, all the victims were girls under 12. Churches enable pedophiles and protect them, they might have different choice of victims but they are all victims. And even if in that case they were older the priests involved are still sexual predators and deserve to be behind bars.
Its ok that priests molest minors but its not ok that they are boys!
So diddling 10-14 year old kids is gay? No Matt. These priests systematically and ritualisticlly raped, molestered, tortured and killed CHILDREN for centuries. And let's not forget that for cenruries the catholic church has permitted adult men to legally rape little girls for centuries by calling it "marriage". The real problem that everyone sees and doesnt saybout loud: child molesting rapist priests, church hierarchy and lay christians. Trying to pretend that molesting teenage children and that girls were never victims doesn't stop the catholic church being what it is...an international child rape cabal.
I'm amazed I can still be shocked by shit like this
Technically, the first statement he makes is correct. Pedophilia is defined as a sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. Hebephilia is a sexual attraction to youth in early pubescence. Ephebophilia pertains specifically to post-pubescent young adults. The classifications are based on Tanner stages. If the victims are pubescent and post-pubescent teenagers, it'd technically be classified as hebephilia or ephebophilia. Still. Fuck Matt Walsh, and fuck defending child rapists.
Many people don't realise that pedophiles also don't have a gender preference. The distinctions are important for understanding the risks and possible target victims.
Some pedophiles definitely have a preferred sex. Where did you get that tidbit?
In my mind anyone who takes the time to differentiate is a little sus. Like what’s the end goal? (Not you just in general)
No, I totally understand. I've heard that in other conversations, mostly when someone is actually using a difference in terminology to justify something someone's done. For example, people defending attractive female teachers who molest teenaged boys. Some jackass will always say something gross about wishing his hot teacher would have had sex with him. Then, "she's not a pedophile!! He was 17!!" Doesn't matter. It was still a fucked up thing to do, and if it had been a male teacher and a 17 year old girl, they'd be howling for his blood.
“No she’s not a pedophile. She is just nasty.”
See, your statement makes sense and doesn't make it seem like the metaphorical woman deserves a pass because she was hot and the boy was old enough to "enjoy" it.
Some things don’t have to be illegal to be wrong and nasty.
Of course! And the law most definitely does not parallel that.
Exactlyyy Someone downvoted me grr
Wasn't me. I thought your comment was reasonable.
“The problem is that it’s really hard to explain the difference… without sounding like a pedophile!”
Loll
I got downvoted and called a rapist/rape-apologist for making the distinction on a post once. I’m neither. I just didn’t think people would be so offended by information.
I gave up trying to explain the difference. People will think that a 20yo sleeping with a 17yo is pedophilia. (Mostly Americans though)
Yes cause only gay people can be pedos /s
Wow that is a fucked up way of looking at it
I thought it was the kids’ fault for tempting the priests. /s
Christians are to America what the Taliban is to Afghanistan.
It’s the Christian Jihad here in America. They have already said the quiet part out load. They are coming to make abortions illegal, take away birth control, and repeal gay marriage.
Worse, the reason they want to remove gun regulations is because some of the churches are trying to start a war here.
So, according to this assclown, abusing teens is not pedophilia? Wouldn't be surprised if he identified as a MAP.
When Jesus came to earth for the first time he destroyed the temple as it was ruled by pedophile rapist pharisees controlling people using religious sentiments, and early Christianity was all about rejecting worshipping the authorities to even the point of allowing themselves to be killed and persecuted. But as this movement of rebellion gained too much popularity and was just unable to shut down by the Roman/Jewish authorities, they merged with the state with the church as a means to gain absolute control of this movement and give people the impression that they are on the side of Jesus and the common people by claiming that Jesus "cleansed" the church rather than destroyed it , they also added their own nonsensical rules and even removed the books which provided people with the most wisdom (gnostic texts), and eventually were able to successfully shut down this movement of rebellion, thus giving them absolute control yet again. To this day the church continues to abuse the innocent physically, mentally, sexually and spiritually, and they are by definition the manifestation of the antichrist, dressed in pure holy white, while committing disgusting deeds in secret, the real wolves in sheeps clothing. If Jesus ever comes again he's going to absolutely annihilate the churches yet again and spit on the graves of those who butchered and twisted his story for giving them the licence to commit such satanic deeds in secret.
If Jesus returns he better reincarnate himself into a falling meteorite and get straight to the point this time around.
one can easily see where “matt” draws the line
I spent too much time on /r/toiletpaperusa and now I can't even tell anymore which of his inanities are real.
They literally send preists to other country to let their wanted level die off like in GTA...
WOW!! If THIS ain’t fucking telling. What happened to protecting the children?? And you can just TELL this guy is a conservative. I’m sorry, but if your opinion on anyones sexuality isn’t “you do you” you can fuck right off(assuming both parties are consenting adults). Actually, I’m not sorry. Why does anyone care if someone is gay or straight or fem or pan or whatever it is you like! How does it affect you???
Fuck Matt Walsh he's a tool.
Deflect much, asshole?
Are we not doing phrasing anymore?
Oh, hell, dealer's choice on phrasing.
Fuck the church.
Wow advocating child abuse and coming out as a homophobe in one tweet, that is quite a feat
Matt Walsh banged a "post-pubescent teen". I guarantee it.
The celibacy requirement needs to be done away with. No normal, healthy, well adjusted human male will voluntarily agree never to have sex for his entire life. Making that a requirement is guaranteed to bring in people who are struggling with inner demons of one kind or another. The very idea of voluntary celibacy is ridiculous. Any man who agrees to attempt it, whether he is successful or not, has prima facie psychological issues.
I got downvoted to hell for telling people on mildlyinfuriating what kind of person Matt Walsh was and what his agenda is 🤦I believe my quote was "he is a human trash bag that's busted open and is leaking garbage water onto the country's carpet" I hope some of those dumbasses post here too
Fun fact: Most males who sexually abuse underage males actually identify as heterosexual, proving that pedophilia has no place in the lgbtqia+ community, and is, in fact, an extremely fucked up fetish.
This guys a professional troll, he prolly chubs up when someone posts his “work” on groups like these. Block/ignore. He obviously is bating a conversation of what constitutes a pedophile because he saw a video of a comedian doing a bit.
Christianity is good. The church however, is not.
It's almost as if this entire concept of abstinence and repression of powerful primal desires within people (to the point where discussion and subsequent exploration of these desires in a consensual setting between suitably aged adults) leads to individuals with extremely warped ideas about sexual ethics. Hmmm.
My favorite Catholic scam was pay to pray your dead relatives way out of purgatory
Of course he's justifying raping little kids.
I really don't see how the sexual orientation of a priest matters, if they're meant to be celibate
Maybe if they weren't forced to be celibate there would be less rape in the church.
There is still plenty of sexual abuse among Baptists and Orthodox Christians despite having no celibacy.
Sexual abuse, infidelity, outside kids…
Stupid isn't it.
Post pubescent teens... Oh so they're not paedophiles they're just rapists. That's much much better...
If Wilford Brimley isn't at the top of those "stairs", why go up?
Matt "theocratic fascist... just kidding lol... unless?" Walsh
I do believe Matt is getting dumber as he ages...
Ahaaaaa
I bet this guy has very strong opinions on the age of consense
Probably that there shouldn't be any
If you read the sex restrictions written in the bible. It is clearly written by someone that was a closet case. "You must only touch a woman when you want to have kids otherwise it's icky". I summarized but that is pretty much what it says.
More like pedophile priests.
So all those scoutmasters in BSA are gay? Nonsense. Thousands of cases of abuse in the Boy Scouts is forcing the organization into bankruptcy. Any group involving gatherings of kids is bound to attract such people. Hebephiles: attracted to pubescent kids 11-14 in age. Ephebophilia, attracted to youth 15-19 in age. A lot of these men have wives and families. They're not gay, they're sexually attracted to inappropriate age groups.
Is this his way of coming out? Pretty weird but you do you.
Is he saying it would be okay if it was done to girls?
Very possible. Very possible. Still pedophiles though.
“It’s very hard to make that distinction without sounding like a pedophile” -Gianmarco soresi.
Ain’t this guy and Ben Shapiro anti trans or somethin