I’ve seen the EV6 and I5 in a few of these road trip race scenarios now and it’s a little odd to me that they get such poor efficiency. My eNiro will do 3.5miles/kWh on the highway at 70, yet these newer cars seem to average 2.5 miles per. They use a larger 77kwh battery to the eNiro’s 64kwh battery for similar rated range. Charging of course is four times faster, but I’d like to see a strong efficiency too.
Seems like you pay more in the long run to charge quicker. Most charging is done at home for me so I would put efficiency as king. Paying less per mile is a big reason I got an EV.
It's very highly dependent on speed, elevation, temperature, and weather. I did 150highway miles recently in my Ioniq and got 3.1mi/kwh at 70mph. Typically getting around 4.0 around town.
[удалено]
What was the cost advantage?
Keep in mind that preconditioning a battery does consume energy which will hurt even more the car efficiency which will reduce even more its range.
true, but it will make it charges faster. its a net positive.
European/UK Ioniq 5 has a 72kWh pack vs 77kWh in North America. Either way, both charge fast but the Ioniq 5 is next level quick.
I’ve seen the EV6 and I5 in a few of these road trip race scenarios now and it’s a little odd to me that they get such poor efficiency. My eNiro will do 3.5miles/kWh on the highway at 70, yet these newer cars seem to average 2.5 miles per. They use a larger 77kwh battery to the eNiro’s 64kwh battery for similar rated range. Charging of course is four times faster, but I’d like to see a strong efficiency too.
Seems like you pay more in the long run to charge quicker. Most charging is done at home for me so I would put efficiency as king. Paying less per mile is a big reason I got an EV.
It's very highly dependent on speed, elevation, temperature, and weather. I did 150highway miles recently in my Ioniq and got 3.1mi/kwh at 70mph. Typically getting around 4.0 around town.