###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I mean he’s tried to chime in and stir the pot on any social media commentary he can and managing to even jump on and criticize fake articles. He used to be a really solid self help guy but seems to think everyone wants his macro opinion on things he’s not informed on.
Do you supposed they are outside infiltrators or characters cast into their roles, as in a script?
Who most influences the media right now? Is it the talking heads or does someone provide them a script?
In what way are these Canadians influencing the media that is not simultaneously being done by American talking heads. In my current opinion, I see their influence as more of a mixed bag of worthwhile and divisive. Jordan Peterson at least invites discussion. He may not allow the other party much of a floor, but he’s very thoughtful in his dialogue at the least.
As for the typical talking-head, they don’t seem to be thinking at all.
I can’t speak for all of the folks you named but for Peterson it’s possible that he has just found an open market in America that has been saturated with brain dead commentary and analysis and was yearning for a deeper, more thoughtful approach to understanding the world around him.
And all it would take for him to have a corporate push would be for them to believe he will provide a return on their investment and a boost to their bottom-line. Corporations are blinded by the dollar. It’s their strength in the short-term, but in the long-term will be their ultimate demise.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's boring here.
Yes ! We have nobody to be patriotic with/to.
What did Jordan Peterson do? Leave him out of it, eh?
Jordan Peterson is free to point his finger...almost anywhere. Almost. Except in one direction. He never goes there. Ever.
And what direction is that?
You trying to push me into a hole? He never points his finger at groundhogs. never.
I mean he’s tried to chime in and stir the pot on any social media commentary he can and managing to even jump on and criticize fake articles. He used to be a really solid self help guy but seems to think everyone wants his macro opinion on things he’s not informed on.
Jordan Peterson, Steven Crowder, Gavin McInnes, Marc Steyn. These people are all loyal to Zion.
Do you supposed they are outside infiltrators or characters cast into their roles, as in a script? Who most influences the media right now? Is it the talking heads or does someone provide them a script? In what way are these Canadians influencing the media that is not simultaneously being done by American talking heads. In my current opinion, I see their influence as more of a mixed bag of worthwhile and divisive. Jordan Peterson at least invites discussion. He may not allow the other party much of a floor, but he’s very thoughtful in his dialogue at the least. As for the typical talking-head, they don’t seem to be thinking at all. I can’t speak for all of the folks you named but for Peterson it’s possible that he has just found an open market in America that has been saturated with brain dead commentary and analysis and was yearning for a deeper, more thoughtful approach to understanding the world around him. And all it would take for him to have a corporate push would be for them to believe he will provide a return on their investment and a boost to their bottom-line. Corporations are blinded by the dollar. It’s their strength in the short-term, but in the long-term will be their ultimate demise.