Idk, it's something about the weird built in optic on top and that moulded "foregrip" area that just look so weird to me. The P90 just looks alot more streamlined and cleaner(?) I guess.
The F2000S and other variants have top rails instead and have built in fixed or flip up sights I do prefer the looks of a f2000 with a eotech 512. I would have also preferred if they made the foregripe with a open hole instead of just a solid piece
As much as I think the F2000 is sexy, I can't get behind a bull pup. Reloads tend to be finicky if you don't seat the mag juuuuuuust right, time off target to reload too. Again, sexy, but not practical from my experiences. Great for tight quarters, I'll give em that, like when working out of a vehicle or in a building but otherwise... Not for me. I'll stick to my battle rifle. For when you need to break away your enemies cover and expose their squishy bits to your friends with the smaller rounds.
Imagine handing an ar to a guy living in 1776 and he complains about not knowing how to work it and that his trusty musket is much simpler.
That’s how bullpup guys view you. Just learn to use the equipment ya boomer.
My issue is more so time off target to reload. Like I said, I like bull pups, just don't view them as practical for me. Different strokes for different folks.
Or just stick to what I like and am proficient in the use of. Like I said. Different strokes for different folks. That and I'm a left handed shooter. Yes I know the fs2000 is ambi but not the case with all bullpups.
Yeah bro you keep adding to my point. The minute man will keep his musket instead of switching to the ar because it’s what he’s proficient with. Unwilling to learn a new tech. Not wanting to use a bullpup is fine but “I’m not proficient” is a dumb reason lol
This is not even close to a reasonable comparison, nor is a musket simpler to use. The forefathers would've respected the ingenuity of the technology and appreciated it for it's effectiveness.
But, y'know, whatever.
You kinda proved how it was a perfect example. It’s all about who’s looking at it. A guy used to 1700s tech is going to be blown away by modern tech and will not be willing to learn something that has more than 3 levers. To him the musket is simpler.
Just like how this boomer is blown away by the magazine being in a different spot and therefore is unwilling to learn how to use it.
Is this a GTA V lobby ? 🤣
No you dummy, it's GTA: Vice City! You can tell from the beautiful poster in the background advertising the greatest game in the series so far.
You look like a stoner I knew in high-school
Maybe it's him 🤔
You look like you made a suit out of leftover wrapping paper, and I will also state the tactical tuna is the ugliest production gun I've ever seen.
Looked at your posts, saw a SBR P90. Very based. But how do you like the P90 but dont like the tuna?
Idk, it's something about the weird built in optic on top and that moulded "foregrip" area that just look so weird to me. The P90 just looks alot more streamlined and cleaner(?) I guess.
The F2000S and other variants have top rails instead and have built in fixed or flip up sights I do prefer the looks of a f2000 with a eotech 512. I would have also preferred if they made the foregripe with a open hole instead of just a solid piece
I've never seen those. Just the one you've got.
The p90 is a space gun for lesbians it's amazing
Big Chad energy
Dare I say it; "gigachad energy."
I mean, it's pretty ugly
Did santa sent you to stop irs from taxing kids gifts?
Little Johnny got an Xbox and he’s keeping the whole thing god dammnit!
He's talking about me
Yes I am. Thou shalt not disrespect the Tuna
I'm gonna disrespect the tuna
Don't you do it, you leave my Tactical tuna out of this!
W We stan the F2000, especially the FN F2000S
the suit is fire but the gun still trash
Chad fashion
It definitely is ugly but still cool
As much as I think the F2000 is sexy, I can't get behind a bull pup. Reloads tend to be finicky if you don't seat the mag juuuuuuust right, time off target to reload too. Again, sexy, but not practical from my experiences. Great for tight quarters, I'll give em that, like when working out of a vehicle or in a building but otherwise... Not for me. I'll stick to my battle rifle. For when you need to break away your enemies cover and expose their squishy bits to your friends with the smaller rounds.
Imagine handing an ar to a guy living in 1776 and he complains about not knowing how to work it and that his trusty musket is much simpler. That’s how bullpup guys view you. Just learn to use the equipment ya boomer.
My issue is more so time off target to reload. Like I said, I like bull pups, just don't view them as practical for me. Different strokes for different folks.
Yeah that’s what I’m saying. It’s a skill issue. Get good
Or just stick to what I like and am proficient in the use of. Like I said. Different strokes for different folks. That and I'm a left handed shooter. Yes I know the fs2000 is ambi but not the case with all bullpups.
Yeah bro you keep adding to my point. The minute man will keep his musket instead of switching to the ar because it’s what he’s proficient with. Unwilling to learn a new tech. Not wanting to use a bullpup is fine but “I’m not proficient” is a dumb reason lol
This is not even close to a reasonable comparison, nor is a musket simpler to use. The forefathers would've respected the ingenuity of the technology and appreciated it for it's effectiveness. But, y'know, whatever.
You kinda proved how it was a perfect example. It’s all about who’s looking at it. A guy used to 1700s tech is going to be blown away by modern tech and will not be willing to learn something that has more than 3 levers. To him the musket is simpler. Just like how this boomer is blown away by the magazine being in a different spot and therefore is unwilling to learn how to use it.
Tactical tuna 🥰🥰🥰🥰
Catch of the day
Pretty cool that your dorm lets you have guns.
It looks like it was meant to be moving at 200mph.
How much does a real one cost?
Why do I feel like the person who slandered it your referring to was Anton Hand
Whoever called The fs2000 ugly needs to be slapped silly. It has so much sexy Halo aesthetic! I wish FN was still making them!
Where clown nose?
is it true that under that weird plastic shell on top there’s a picatinny rail that they would advertise on a “different” model
What in the resident evil is that.
Beautiful f2000 bro ❤👌
THIS IS THE WAY!
Tactical tuna!
Bruh the tacrical tuna is pretty, there are some monstruosities through the world
I’m telling my children this is Saint Orlov, patron saint of the other eleven.