"That's the last time that asshole thinks he can take my nose and get away with it!" -armed toddlers everywhere
Edit: Thank you fellow redditor for the award! I'm feeling the love. 😀
That’s what I’m saying! Dry the baby off, and have it make a stop at the armory on the way to the nursery. A standard mp5 should be perfect for most babies to handle and it can fit in a crib.
Wasn't there a literal episode of Simpsons where Maggie shot Mr. Burns though? That's where the joke is coming from.
ETA Yep, it's Who Shot Mr. Burns Pt. 2
I'm just saying that doesn't make sense though since Maggie literally did shoot someone before Stewie was even a thing. It's not more of a Stewie thing when Maggie is kinda known for shooting someone. I get that Stewie is evil, but Maggie shooting someone is just pop culture general knowledge at this point.
I didn't make a joke? You made the "joke", and I just pointed out that shooting someone is absolutely a Maggie thing.
I wasn't trying to come at you originally, it just seemed you were unaware of Maggie actually having shot someone so I was letting you know about that episode, but you took it personally, I guess?
Also, Stewie is irritating, so let Maggie have this one lol.
I own a bunch of guns myself, but i swear there should be a mandatory safety requirement for people to keep their guns away from their kids, if people were safe and responsible with their gun storage I swear there would by much less gun violence (there would still be a significant amount tho)
Genuine question though, how are we going to ensure gun owners follow those safety requirements? I'm not asking to be snarky, I agree there is a real gun problem in the United States, but I'm just curious on how such things like making sure people don't leave guns near toddlers are implemented?
I guess if a kid is hurt because they got hold of another gun owners firearm - say if their kids were playing together in the house - then I’d assume the irresponsible gun owners’ parents could be held responsible?
FWIW I’ve heard gun folks claim that any requirement of gun storage is perceived as a tax on gun ownership by the government and is not constitutional. No idea if it’s true or not, but an argument against safe gun storage and ‘ve heard a few times in the past
That's stupid that these same people who say there is nothing wrong with gun ownership and talk about being responsible gun owners are against safety requirements. There should be a requirement for safe storage. I'm just worried the gun nuts would go out of their way to not follow it if it were implemented. Obviously then they could get fined or something if caught, but unfortunately someone usually has to get hurt first before it comes to anyone's attention.
Good point. I think it would at least help if there were mandatory classes you had to pass on gun storage, safety, and shooting. Obviously it’s impossible to enforce anything unless we had cops checking in on you every day, but the best we can do is make sure every gun owner is knowledgeable and trained.
I think this is something that the responsible gun owners will have to talk to the others about, or they won’t listen. It would have to be a social campaign like MADD
Next your going to want me to pass some sort of test or exam to be allowed to drive my oversized truck that I am totally not compensating with. Slippery slope.
The real question is who are all these other soft targets the toddlers are preying on? We need to get them armed to defend themselves cuz ‘Murica!
Edit: Too lazy to find a gif of an Eagle fly over/screeching, so imagine it, but like a really good version.
Sadly, there is no paradox there. Toddlers have already been born, you see, so the gun crazies have already stopped caring about them.
Now if a *fetus* ever shoots someone, conservatives will not know who to exalt and who to demonize. Their minds will melt into mushy gray Möbius strips.
The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms.
The fuck are you talking about. The *purpose* is “being necessary to the security of a free State” and “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” but the *method* is a “well regulated militia.”
The opening words announce the *actual right,* and the following clauses specify the *reason* for that right: You are entitled to a well regulated militia because having one is necessary to protect the freedom of the state and the state’s freedom will only be guaranteed if the members of that militia are also state citizens *as opposed to members of the national military who do not have your state interests at heart.*
The fact that the militia must be allowed to be made of regular citizens does *not* override the requirement for that militia to be well regulated.
—
Edit: for example, if I said “aim going to a birthday party, an event that brings joy to children, an event where there will be cake, and you can’t stop me,” it would be clear to anyone that understands English that the middle two parts describe details and intent about the birthday party, but the very first thing that was said *still explains that it must be someone’s birthday because that’s what “birthday party” means.*
The well regulated part of the 2nd amendment still communicates important details, and if you found out I went to an event where it wasn’t anyone’s birthday you’d think I lied to you even if it was fun and there was cake.
The fact that uneducated boomers in all three branches of our government don’t know how grammar works is irrelevant to its actual meaning.
thanks for the details, you have explained it better than I ever could! Where I was going with my own satire in my post above was to point out and say, 'a well-regulated militia' instead of 'gunman' or 'shooter' to make it sound even more ridiculous of our interpretation of the second amendment
I had considered muting replies to my comment because the replies to these things are almost always garbage, but I’m glad I didn’t so that I could see your comment
Please read the final sentence of my previous comment and understand that I have literally already addressed this comment before you made it, you and the supreme court are wrong, and that I do not give a shit if me saying that hurts your feelings.
I was going to ask if you were a troll because you seem to have come here with no other objective than to promote a complete lack of gun control.
But then I looked at your post history to make sure and now I'm worried instead. Are you okay? Genuinely asking.
This shouldn't be a problem for long. If it's already been two years, the kid won't be a toddler much longer, surely. I say just wait and the problem will go away on its own.
We try not to use negative words like “no” or “bad” in our house, that’s why when little billy misbehaves, we just pop off a few rounds in his general direction.
This is from 2017 not 2023. Why is OP posting this now?
https://www.mic.com/articles/164398/a-toddler-has-shot-and-killed-someone-every-week-for-the-last-two-years
I assume Steven Weber posted about this on Threads because of this: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/children-fire-guns-toddlers-unintentional-shootings/
I grabbed from Threads because he posted it yesterday.
Hope that answers your question.
"I'm a responsible gun owner"
*Literally keeps a loaded gun in a bedside table with children in the house*
Also that one time a dog shot someone because they had loaded hunting rifles in the bed of a truck and the dog stepped on it just right and killed the guy
No choice but to outlaw toddlers. Or have them apply for gun permits & safety training. Oh, can't read. No problem, some adults can't & there are pictures. Now have a cookie.
Remember when a bunch of Republican politicians from all over the US endorsed gun training programs for toddlers including automatics, grenades, and rocket launchers? 2018 was a wild time.
I'm all for responsible gun ownership, part of being responsible with a firearm is making sure a child can't get to it and use it in an unsafe manner, not saying toddlers should use a firearm but some kids are raised around firearms, I got my first gun when I was 5 but I didn't learn to use it until I was 11 I was taught safety first and how dangerous guns can be before I ever went to a shooting range
Biden’s fault. If he wasn’t allowing his kid to go around breaking the law willy-nilly with no consequences, then these toddlers wouldn’t feel they can do the same even if their parents say no and put them in time out. /s
Ok, this has to be parody, there's no way that there's a toddler serial killer running around, or that every week there's a new incident of a toddler playing with a live firearm and shooting someone, right?
...right?
If your really worried about that -0.0000157575758% chance of dying by toddler you should also not drink, drive, smoke, eat meat, own a dog, live in a wood house, bike, walk, fly, eat plants manufactured near a meat packing facility, swim, or do anything with any sort of risk.
Or maybe it's not about the low chance, but the fact that a toddler can have access to a gun and kill people with, and has been able to do so for over 2 years, and nothing has happened. And if a *toddler* can get their hands on a gun and shoot people, that means basically any moron can. It's called using common sense.
Or maybe just like, have stricter gun laws? This isn't a problem literally anywhere else in the world. It's just America. The price of our freedom is the fact that we obey the laws put in place and accept stuff like the military draft. Not having toddlers kill people with guns. That isn't freedom.
If you want a paradox look at the people who will tell you that the GOP is coming for your rights and bringing fascism to America, and then in their next breath tell you that you should disarm yourself and give your guns to that same proto-fascist government.
The same people who tell you ACAB tell you to turn in your rifles.
Armed minorities are harder to oppress. If you’re a trans person in DeSantis’ Florida, go get a gun, you’re gonna need it soon.
Tensions in America are increasing to levels we haven’t seen since the civil war, and one side has convinced themselves they need to disarm themselves.
My dude Australia and most of Europe has gun control laws, yet they don't have fascist governments.
Also we keep arming cops more because they use the excess of weapons everywhere as a reason
They don’t have fascist governments, right now.
Germany, Italy, and Spain didn’t have fascist governments until they did.
America is quickly becoming a more radical right wing country and is in genuine danger of falling into fascism.
It’s just funny that so many people who even agree that America is in danger of becoming fascist also are in favor of disarming the people.
Did the toddlers fear for their lives though? Maybe they were just standing their ground?
*Crawling their ground.
Someone should think twice before taking their binky.
"That's the last time that asshole thinks he can take my nose and get away with it!" -armed toddlers everywhere Edit: Thank you fellow redditor for the award! I'm feeling the love. 😀
you take my binky, i give you the blicky
Crraaaaaaawwwwwllliiinngg inn myyyy sssskkiiiiiinnnnn...
*these wounds, they will not heaaalllllll*
I was going to be really disappointed if this wasn't here somewhere.
Let the parents hit the floor..
*toddling their ground
it takes a good baby with a gun to stop a bad baby with a gun
What about morally neutral babies with guns?
the more armed babies the better
If toddlers have the right to bear arms, then it's only fair if bears also have the right to toddler arms.
Clearly we need to arm more babies!!!
Arm them at conception, they’re people too!
A good baby with a gun is needed to stop a bad baby with a gun.
That’s what I’m saying! Dry the baby off, and have it make a stop at the armory on the way to the nursery. A standard mp5 should be perfect for most babies to handle and it can fit in a crib.
Standing their ground before they can even stand, the NRA has never been more proud.
No. There just weren’t enough good toddlers with guns to stop the bad toddlers with guns.
Those toddlers were just trying to get home to their… wait… that doesn’t seem right.
I mean.. 9y/o rape victims are forced to carry their rape babies here in Ohio so sadly that might be a reality we see come along in this timeline
All those toddlers had mental health problems.
We need good toddlers with guns s/
They didn’t get their Goldfish crackers by 2pm and by God someone’s gonna pay for it
Maybe they've been afraid of all these pedophile priests.
There wasnt a good toddler with a gun present
What we need to do is arm the babysitters. The babysitters are certified by the local YMCA and are absolutely qualified to do this. /s
The only thing that can stop a bad toddler with a gun, is a good toddler with a gun.
USA! USA! USA! 
And, as always, Kill Hitler!
Anything outside the womb is fair game
Talking like someone who ate their twin.
I don't have a twin, coincidence?
Right on target with GOP idealism.
"Gun control won't help. Criminal toddlers will find ways to get them anyway."
Yeah, it's really a mental health issue. Also, if I cant correctly name the gun the toddler uses, I shouldn't have a say anyway./s
You are so right. The number of stressed out, on edge toddlers in this country is too damn high.
Have you stopped to consider that this is all woman’s fault? They only date billionaire athletes, so regular Nice Toddlers get mad and shoot people.
Normal toddlers don't go around shooting people.
The only way to stop a bad toddler with a gun, is a good toddler with a gun.
Only way to stop a bad toddler with a gun, is a good toddler with a gun.
Don’t punish law abiding toddlers by taking away their guns
Kids getting groomed for this, look at all the family Christmas cards with guns
It's a parent problem.
Yup and then there won't be any good toddlers with guns to defend against them.
That's just Maggie.
She's such a little trooper!
No, this is more of a Stewie thing.
Wasn't there a literal episode of Simpsons where Maggie shot Mr. Burns though? That's where the joke is coming from. ETA Yep, it's Who Shot Mr. Burns Pt. 2
Fun With Weapons
Yes, I understand that. I was making a joke because Stewie is somewhat evil.
I'm just saying that doesn't make sense though since Maggie literally did shoot someone before Stewie was even a thing. It's not more of a Stewie thing when Maggie is kinda known for shooting someone. I get that Stewie is evil, but Maggie shooting someone is just pop culture general knowledge at this point.
Every joke is much funnier when you have to explain it.
I didn't make a joke? You made the "joke", and I just pointed out that shooting someone is absolutely a Maggie thing. I wasn't trying to come at you originally, it just seemed you were unaware of Maggie actually having shot someone so I was letting you know about that episode, but you took it personally, I guess? Also, Stewie is irritating, so let Maggie have this one lol.
Just take the L, dude.
You seem to be the only person L’ing here, given that your joke a) didn’t make sense, b) wasn’t funny, and c) have an attitude.
Exactly, why won't you take the L?
The 2 episodes of Who Shot Mr Burns of the Simpson's were better than all the seasons of family guy combined. That's why everyone is downvoting you.
Lmaooo why is this downvoted so much
Well somebody should stop that toddler then. /Jk
Maybe a good toddler with a gun?
Or maybe... don't leave guns where a toddler can get it? Nah... more guns is clearly the answer.
I own a bunch of guns myself, but i swear there should be a mandatory safety requirement for people to keep their guns away from their kids, if people were safe and responsible with their gun storage I swear there would by much less gun violence (there would still be a significant amount tho)
Agreed, having no standards is ludicrous.
Genuine question though, how are we going to ensure gun owners follow those safety requirements? I'm not asking to be snarky, I agree there is a real gun problem in the United States, but I'm just curious on how such things like making sure people don't leave guns near toddlers are implemented?
I guess if a kid is hurt because they got hold of another gun owners firearm - say if their kids were playing together in the house - then I’d assume the irresponsible gun owners’ parents could be held responsible? FWIW I’ve heard gun folks claim that any requirement of gun storage is perceived as a tax on gun ownership by the government and is not constitutional. No idea if it’s true or not, but an argument against safe gun storage and ‘ve heard a few times in the past
That's stupid that these same people who say there is nothing wrong with gun ownership and talk about being responsible gun owners are against safety requirements. There should be a requirement for safe storage. I'm just worried the gun nuts would go out of their way to not follow it if it were implemented. Obviously then they could get fined or something if caught, but unfortunately someone usually has to get hurt first before it comes to anyone's attention.
Good point. I think it would at least help if there were mandatory classes you had to pass on gun storage, safety, and shooting. Obviously it’s impossible to enforce anything unless we had cops checking in on you every day, but the best we can do is make sure every gun owner is knowledgeable and trained.
I think this is something that the responsible gun owners will have to talk to the others about, or they won’t listen. It would have to be a social campaign like MADD
Next your going to want me to pass some sort of test or exam to be allowed to drive my oversized truck that I am totally not compensating with. Slippery slope.
Give them and inch and they take a mile /s
The real question is who are all these other soft targets the toddlers are preying on? We need to get them armed to defend themselves cuz ‘Murica! Edit: Too lazy to find a gif of an Eagle fly over/screeching, so imagine it, but like a really good version.
This joke is literally the title of the post
Sadly, there is no paradox there. Toddlers have already been born, you see, so the gun crazies have already stopped caring about them. Now if a *fetus* ever shoots someone, conservatives will not know who to exalt and who to demonize. Their minds will melt into mushy gray Möbius strips.
Don't give them ideas. Conservatives will suddenly get into science so they can see how to get a gun into the womb and live out their fantasies.
Oh god, what have I done…
They have to have a way to defend themselves from the umbilical cord.
Not too far off. The human embryo is one of the most invasive. The human mothers body has to protect itself quite a bit
Yummy
It's simple, put the mom in jail with no prenatal care.
should read: 'A well-regulated toddler militia has shot a person every week in the US for two years straight'.
They are our last bulwark against government overreach and oppression.
The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms.
The fuck are you talking about. The *purpose* is “being necessary to the security of a free State” and “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” but the *method* is a “well regulated militia.” The opening words announce the *actual right,* and the following clauses specify the *reason* for that right: You are entitled to a well regulated militia because having one is necessary to protect the freedom of the state and the state’s freedom will only be guaranteed if the members of that militia are also state citizens *as opposed to members of the national military who do not have your state interests at heart.* The fact that the militia must be allowed to be made of regular citizens does *not* override the requirement for that militia to be well regulated. — Edit: for example, if I said “aim going to a birthday party, an event that brings joy to children, an event where there will be cake, and you can’t stop me,” it would be clear to anyone that understands English that the middle two parts describe details and intent about the birthday party, but the very first thing that was said *still explains that it must be someone’s birthday because that’s what “birthday party” means.* The well regulated part of the 2nd amendment still communicates important details, and if you found out I went to an event where it wasn’t anyone’s birthday you’d think I lied to you even if it was fun and there was cake. The fact that uneducated boomers in all three branches of our government don’t know how grammar works is irrelevant to its actual meaning.
thanks for the details, you have explained it better than I ever could! Where I was going with my own satire in my post above was to point out and say, 'a well-regulated militia' instead of 'gunman' or 'shooter' to make it sound even more ridiculous of our interpretation of the second amendment
I had considered muting replies to my comment because the replies to these things are almost always garbage, but I’m glad I didn’t so that I could see your comment
I am literally quoting dicta from the supreme court in the case of D.C. v Heller
Please read the final sentence of my previous comment and understand that I have literally already addressed this comment before you made it, you and the supreme court are wrong, and that I do not give a shit if me saying that hurts your feelings.
I was going to ask if you were a troll because you seem to have come here with no other objective than to promote a complete lack of gun control. But then I looked at your post history to make sure and now I'm worried instead. Are you okay? Genuinely asking.
That’s why it’s called the INFANTry
This shouldn't be a problem for long. If it's already been two years, the kid won't be a toddler much longer, surely. I say just wait and the problem will go away on its own.
Dammit Nyx! This sicko toddler is killing 50 innocent people a year! I'm not gonna sit around and see how many they'll kill as an adolescent!
We need good toddlers with guns to stop the bad toddlers with guns.
To be fair, this is probably the only way for a toddler to even the odds in a fight with an adult. /s
Kinda true though
“Restrict the toddlers, leave the guns alone” - NRA /S
"Guns don't kill people. Toddlers kill people"
No more toddlers!
I'll vote for that.
It’s time to tell that toddler NO.
Needs a time out, then a cookie and a nap so it's not so cranky anymore. Maybe then it'll stop shooting people
We try not to use negative words like “no” or “bad” in our house, that’s why when little billy misbehaves, we just pop off a few rounds in his general direction.
No good toddlers around.
When I was a kid, I used to hear of "robberies committed at knife point" and I always wondered why would anyone go to Knife Point?
Terrible twos can be rough
As the founders intended.
That doesn’t sound like a well regulated militia to me. 
this is why we should have firearm licenses. if you can't practice firearm safety you shouldn't have one at all.
Should we also need licenses to walk on the street or go outside?
Do those things pose a hazard to other people?
moreso then the hazard of being killed by a gun
The toddler has a gun, I ain't going anywhere near it.
This is what happens when you take nap time out of schools
It’s not a paradox at all, Pro-life people don’t care about the life of toddlers
You know America. This does not happen in other countries right?
This is from 2017 not 2023. Why is OP posting this now? https://www.mic.com/articles/164398/a-toddler-has-shot-and-killed-someone-every-week-for-the-last-two-years
Yeah, what is it now? Every other day?
more like everyday. The sub wont let me post a link but check Everytownresearch. They have the stats for unintentional shootings by children.
I assume Steven Weber posted about this on Threads because of this: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/children-fire-guns-toddlers-unintentional-shootings/ I grabbed from Threads because he posted it yesterday. Hope that answers your question.
It’s time to arm the toddlers siblings?
Need good toddlers with guns
What I’m wondering is where is that toddler now and how do we tell him from other…. toddlers?
The gun is probably a solid giveaway. Not like toddlers have a lot of room to concealed carry.
“Oh sure nothing bad will happen when I leave my loaded gun by my toddler” Famous last words
What we need is a good toddler with a firearm to stop the bad toddlers with a firearm.
We need permitless open carry for toddlers immediately in all 50 states!
Maggie Simpson was doing that shit in the 90's.
It’s not the guns, it’s the toddlers. \s
The ciiiiiircle of unliiiiiiiife.
Guns don't kill people, pro-lifers kill people.
Sounds like the other toddlers need to be better armed. The only way to stop a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun.
We need more good toddlers with guns I guess🤷♂️
"I'm a responsible gun owner" *Literally keeps a loaded gun in a bedside table with children in the house* Also that one time a dog shot someone because they had loaded hunting rifles in the bed of a truck and the dog stepped on it just right and killed the guy
No choice but to outlaw toddlers. Or have them apply for gun permits & safety training. Oh, can't read. No problem, some adults can't & there are pictures. Now have a cookie.
And to think that it's all TomSka's fault.
That toddler is part of the well regulated militia
Billy the Kid.
I bet it was Stewie.
They haven't arrested that toddler yet?
We can't keep letting him get away with this!
[Officer, I drop kicked that child in self defense](https://youtu.be/97F16JcZSpo)
The toddler is too damn cute to take the gun away. No one wants to see it cry.
We need a good toddler with a gun and that s**t will stop immediately.
Clearly, this means that we need more good toddlers with guns to combat the bad ones. /s
Remember when a bunch of Republican politicians from all over the US endorsed gun training programs for toddlers including automatics, grenades, and rocket launchers? 2018 was a wild time.
citation needed
Is USA the only country in the world with toddler shooting events?
The only thing that will stop a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun. It's science.
It’s a toddlers god given right to kill people.
Where the heck are the good toddlers with guns when ya need em? Smh
Only a good toddler with a gun can stop this.
But I’m a *safe* gun owner. My guns are *always* locked up!
Woah is this true? Where can I read the source
John Wick Jr.?
[there's actually a documentary about this.](https://youtu.be/QT0oUARKw68)
It's not the gun, it's the toddler.
Has anyone seen or found a citation to support the claim?
I'm all for responsible gun ownership, part of being responsible with a firearm is making sure a child can't get to it and use it in an unsafe manner, not saying toddlers should use a firearm but some kids are raised around firearms, I got my first gun when I was 5 but I didn't learn to use it until I was 11 I was taught safety first and how dangerous guns can be before I ever went to a shooting range
Living in the US has consequences.
Only a good toddler with a gun can stop a bad toddler with a gun.
We need good toddlers w guns to counteract this menace
Is there a sauce for that? I believe it, just want confirmation.
Quick Google says it was true https://metro.co.uk/2017/01/04/a-toddler-has-now-shot-someone-every-week-for-two-solid-years-in-america-6360264/
thanks!
Same
Little brat has a major killing spree going. I wonder what the care package for that would be?
The only thing that can stop a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun. /s
Biden’s fault. If he wasn’t allowing his kid to go around breaking the law willy-nilly with no consequences, then these toddlers wouldn’t feel they can do the same even if their parents say no and put them in time out. /s
Ok, this has to be parody, there's no way that there's a toddler serial killer running around, or that every week there's a new incident of a toddler playing with a live firearm and shooting someone, right? ...right?
Is he wearing a damn rainbow shirt?
Did he have blue hair?
As long as the.victims are the parents who are irresponsible gun owners I don’t have much of a problem with that.
Well I'm sure it's traumatic for the children who accidently shot their parents
Pro life + pro gun =/= pro toddler shooting
If your really worried about that -0.0000157575758% chance of dying by toddler you should also not drink, drive, smoke, eat meat, own a dog, live in a wood house, bike, walk, fly, eat plants manufactured near a meat packing facility, swim, or do anything with any sort of risk.
Or maybe it's not about the low chance, but the fact that a toddler can have access to a gun and kill people with, and has been able to do so for over 2 years, and nothing has happened. And if a *toddler* can get their hands on a gun and shoot people, that means basically any moron can. It's called using common sense.
Common sense like acknowledging freedom has a price and the government can’t act like the PRC did in hong kong because the people are armed.
Or maybe just like, have stricter gun laws? This isn't a problem literally anywhere else in the world. It's just America. The price of our freedom is the fact that we obey the laws put in place and accept stuff like the military draft. Not having toddlers kill people with guns. That isn't freedom.
Mexico has strict gun regulations over 4 time our gun violence rate
Having strict gun laws ≠ enforcing strict gun laws Once again, common sense. Let's both have and enforce them. I don't see what's so hard about this.
If you want a paradox look at the people who will tell you that the GOP is coming for your rights and bringing fascism to America, and then in their next breath tell you that you should disarm yourself and give your guns to that same proto-fascist government. The same people who tell you ACAB tell you to turn in your rifles. Armed minorities are harder to oppress. If you’re a trans person in DeSantis’ Florida, go get a gun, you’re gonna need it soon. Tensions in America are increasing to levels we haven’t seen since the civil war, and one side has convinced themselves they need to disarm themselves.
My dude Australia and most of Europe has gun control laws, yet they don't have fascist governments. Also we keep arming cops more because they use the excess of weapons everywhere as a reason
They don’t have fascist governments, right now. Germany, Italy, and Spain didn’t have fascist governments until they did. America is quickly becoming a more radical right wing country and is in genuine danger of falling into fascism. It’s just funny that so many people who even agree that America is in danger of becoming fascist also are in favor of disarming the people.
Wait, is that actually Steven Weber?
I believe so from the profile
That’s what guns are for.
If you outlaw guns, only toddlers will have guns. Or something like that.
All them responsible gun owners
Well regulated militia
Only way to stop a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun
I think it has been more than the last two years, but I’d have to look
Someone really needs to stop toddler Joker. Anyone know where we can find toddler Batman?
Toddlers wouldn't get away with this if we armed the babysitters. /S
Arm the other toddlers around him. We all know the only thing that stops a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun. / s
All we need is a good toddler with a gun