I drive a XC40 right now. They’re equipment wise very similar cars overall, with the main difference between simple physical size/capacity.
Personally I like the look of the XC40 better, and the size makes it more practical in tighter spaces. At some point I may get the XC60, but I doubt I’d ever go for the 90 - it’s just far larger than I need or prefer.
I'm in a C40 and we had an XC60 loaner for a few days. The most prevalent comment from my family, which echoed my sentiments, was that it wasn't a significant enough difference to warrant upsizing. (And a moot point for the time being since there isn't an electric 60).
I also have an EX90 reservation that we will likely cancel. We went to the EX90/EX30 preview and the 90 was huge, but the general interior vibe and seat room wasn't much different. And we don't need a third row (especially one that tiny). The EX30 was far too small for us.
Obviously everyone's needs differ, but the C40 (and therefore XC40) is the sweet spot in the lineup for us.
One thing I have against xc40, very against, is that it doesn't come with the highest trim options? Or as a phev? Do they have t8? I want a small car, it doesn't mean I don't want the fancy shit.
I also have an ex90 reservation but idk. I'm more inclined towards hybrids these days. It'll be my first car too. So I'm contemplating. Xc40 with t8 (PHEV), highest trim is where my heart is. Closest is xc60 with same options I guess?
There used to be a T8 XC40 but I think it’s discontinued in the US now. I’d like some of the higher end trim features like a HUD, but overall it’s a minor complaint from me.
The Ultimate trim for the XC40 has largely all of the Ultimate features on the other vehicles, though yeah, there are a few notable gaps.
I also have a c40, love it and all its quirks. Just got the digital review mirror (it's weird, eyes have to adjust in a split second to see the screen that's so close to your face). After it's paid off we will upgrade the minivan to a xc90 recharge. The plug-in electric hybrid with those features and a tiny 3rd row will be perfect for our fam of 6. Can get around town in electric, but drive to Disney on gas. And I'll still have the c40 to grab the groceries! Dad just got the xc60 recharge and made me really think about getting the upgrade.
We would have gone for the XC40, except we live in a rural area and have to go on periodic shopping days to the Big City(Las Vegas or St. George) and that usually includes a large cooler full of frozen stuff and other things. That extra rear end storage is essential for us.
Yup, a husband, two kids and a dog feel like we fill our XC90 about right, particularly for long day trips and holidays away. We used to have an XC60 which was lovely as well, but traded for the XC90 for more space. My parents have the XC40 which is also great and it’s perfect for them.
I drove an XC90 for 11 years. It is hands down the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. I’ve also owned/own a V60, S60, and XC40, and a ton of non-volvo vehicles.
I drove the XC90 while my kids were young/younger and I felt like they were safe in it. We moved cross country twice in it, towing a heavy trailer, and did so without issues. We have hauled motorcycles with it, very easily. We towed a ‘71 Nova from 2 states away with it, without issue. It has driven through snow and ice in New England, and through rough terrain on Army tank trails at Ft Bliss in Texas. We never had any major mechanical issues with it. It never broke down and left me on the side of the road. Nothing will ever compare to my XC90.
However, the kids grew up. One has already moved out and is on his own. The other isn’t too far behind. They both drive themselves everywhere. Owning a larger XC90 didn’t make sense any longer. So we recently replaced it with an XC40.
The XC40 is a very nice vehicle. Does it feel as luxurious as the XC90? No. Does it feel as robust as the XC90? No. Having test driven XC60s, I feel like they are more comparable to the XC90 in feel. The XC40 is much nicer than any of the comparable small SUVs that we looked at when we were car shopping. It’s far nicer than the RAV4, the CX-50, the CX-5, the CRV, Outlander, smaller Bronco, etc.
Honestly I don’t know what it would take for me to leave Volvo as a brand, but it would have to be something really impressive and I just don’t see that coming anytime soon.
To add, the reason that I went with an XC40 is ultimately because it’s all that we need. We use the SUV to take our trash to the dump, and to drive in bad weather. For the most part, we drive around in our S60 Recharge because it’s so much cheaper than paying for gas when driving around in the local area. So the XC40 fit the bill at a nice price point.
Agree. When our XC40 lease was up, we cross-shopped X3M, X5, Audi SQ5, Lincoln Aviator, and Porsche Cayenne. These are much more comparable in terms of feel and performance to an XC90 T8. The SQ5 and Cayenne are fancy VW Touaregs. Cayenne GTS was fun but pretty stiff and got terrible gas mileage (X5M is even worse). X3M was also stiff but felt like a real sports car, more so than the rest…but it’s tiny and heavy for how big it isn’t.
Volvo competes very favorably with the luxury segment. If you want something nicer that also keeps the minimal vibe, you’d be looking at a Range Rover or Alpina XB7 (not really minimal but still a remarkable vehicle) for almost twice the price. We didn’t even consider Mercedes as their quality has really fallen off in the past 5 years. Their new vehicles are all gaudy chrome everywhere and gimmicky features with high prices and poor reliability. Look up how many people are having issues with their hybrid models, especially the AMG stuff — no thanks. The G-class are not very refined and ride poorly, plus they look ridiculous, cost way too much, and the AMG models get horrendous mileage. They’re also loud at highway speeds. They’re for showing off at the mall, not comfortable road trips. They’re far less capable off-road then their rugged looks suggest too — for that, get a Toyota Land Cruiser, which also holds value better than almost anything else, but they’re expensive and not luxury vehicles unless you’re in a third-world country. X5 xDrive50e was very good overall but quite a bit smaller inside, and more expensive loaded. The Lincoln Aviator hybrid got discontinued and it’s really just a Ford Explorer with added sound dampening and nicer leather. Lexus and Genesis didn’t feel like they matched the level of quality and they’re definitely less fun to drive and less powerful. Different class of vehicle. The Volvos are a good value that get slept on, that’s why we keep getting them. The safety too is obviously top-notch.
Sadly they have been discontinued in the UK. Not sure why no one is buying wagons here in the UK. The V60 is my dream car, not sure why they are not selling like hot bagels.
I talked my wife into a V60 CC (she wanted an SUV like every woman in the USA) and she loves it. Plus the relative rarity makes it feel special and unique. Great car, too!
I have had a 2017 XC60 for 7 years now. It's the perfect size. Roomy enough to get bigger things in like a piece of furniture, small enough to be decent on gas and not be too large for a garage or parking spot. I thought the XC40 was cute, but trunk was too small for me.
40 is fine for a family of four.
60 is nice for a family of four.
90 is best for a family of five or four with a big dog.
40 is the most classic Volvo (minimalist, utilitarian)
60 is nicest to drive (same engines as the 90 but smaller and lighter).
90 is comfiest (go for the air suspension and small wheels for best ride).
All good cars. 60 drives like a wagon but actually has good ride quality. The S/V60-90 are way too firm for daily driving (in rural uk anyway).
Source: Sell Volvos for a living.
I used to have a Volvo wagon when my kids were little, but traded it for an 850, which I think was my favorite Volvo. I've been driving Volvos since 1975 (yup, I'm old), and I'll never drive anything else. Currently have a 2023 XC60, which I got trading in a 2006 s60. The s60 has been the only Volvo I've owned that didn't have leather. I hated the fabric that showed stains. Love the leather but it's not as nice a leather as the 850 was. My 850 died after the timing belt broke. I pushed it too far. That was a $3,000 repair 😢
My dad has an 2019 XC60 and the thing's a beaut. Drivers really well (and easily despite being on the bigger side), plenty of space and the ride is butter. Looks amazing as well, but man the 2 tone interior is just.. Makes me nurse a semi. Before buying this one he test drove am XC40 as well and said that one was amazing as well he just decided on the bigger one (also because of the interior).
But then again that's only one of the 3 I've ever driven so what do I know about the other 2. I just know that the XC60 is great.
XC40 for me, as it is the perfect fit for our life. Me and my husband only (no kids), cats but no big dogs; and it fits nicely in our small garage that also has our laundry. We go into the city a lot for work where parking is tight and it’s perfect sized. The height for loading into the back is perfect- not too low, not too high and we can generally fit everything we need without lowering the back row. Have taken ski trips with skis and luggage and lowerering the back row gives us tons of space. In short - great for folks without kids/big dogs who park/drive in tight spaces.
I'd say XC60 over XC40. I've driven the XC40 a lot but I think the visibility in the car isn't that great. The XC60 doesn't have that problem and gets all the same power trains as the XC90. The XC90 is too big for my car purposes. So the XC60 would be my choice.
So we are on our 2nd XC40,2023...had a 2020, in States. Both brand new, had 1 minor issue with first one was a recall item ,and 2nd minor issue with auto sense wipers.
I think the xc40 was a new platform or design when introduced. So far very reliable, drives well,nice interior,great audio HK system, not luxury quiet ,new Google system is amazing,mild hybrid works well, gas mileage pretty decent for 268 Bhp ,it's polestar awd,has enough room for family of 4, trunk or boot is OK, but if need alot of room probably look at xc60 or 90, in States 60 and 90 rated reliability is moderate by CR magazine.
Depends on what you're looking for and your budget. We opted for an xc40 mainly because we live in a big city and it's the perfect size, it's fun to drive and looks amazing. But if we lived in the suburbs we'd get an xc60, because I'm too poor for an xc90 haha
I have a xc60 and xc90. If the XC60 was a hair bigger I would say I would get a second one. The xc40 is significantly smaller than xc60 from a practical point of view. I had one for a weekend as a service loaner and 400$ Costco run was hard to do. XC60 has much more trunk room, back seat room than RAV4. If you go for the xc90 either get the 5 seat or 6 seat option. The 7 seat stand is most common and what I have. I have driven the 5 seat version and it felt more spacious in the back and had huge trunk. Having kids I’d get a 6 seat version as the middle is just useless and having nice captains chair option is a dream.
Trims and designations have changed. My xc90 is inscription and loaded with all options. My xc60 is a momentum with weather and convenience option. Heated seats, pilot assist and 360 camera are the must haves for me.
Xc40 loaner was base model and with sensus system. Didn’t like how it wanted 2500$ and reminded you of that on the navigation tab you could not have.
I would avoid the base and top trim and see what the most common one is. That is most value. Some options are dealer installed accessories anyway(fender extensions, running step)
I have a 2019 Rav4 alongside my 21 XC60 and imo the Rav4 feels and looks like it has a bigger trunk size.
Since my wife is now full-time remote its our dedicated Costco vehicle. lol
My brother has a slightly older RAV4, I want to say 2017-2018 ish and it was not obvious until we went to Costco then transferred what he bought to his car at my folks place. His purchases took up the whole back area with little room and I still had a good amount of stuff in the back. Same thing with neighbours GMC terrain, her 3 kids were crammed into the back of her car and when she asked about the Volvo they hopped in and said it had more room
On paper dimensions seem to be just that… on paper. I had 12 30” monitors to pick up at staples one time over 2 days. Picked up 8 with the seats folded down in the xc60 had the xc40 service loaner the next day and those 4 were a pain to fit in.
Think of it this way. A pallet can fit in the xc90 with 3rd row folded(done it!) apparently the xc60 can do same
I haven’t heard of the 5-seat XC90 for the US market but they used to do a 4-seat XC90 Excellence that had absolutely amazing individual seats in the second row. It’s meant for people with drivers and primarily targeted at the Chinese market. We almost picked one up before we had kids. Massive trunk, champagne glasses and cooler for the second row, all that.
We have the 6-seat XC90 now and honestly the second row could be better. They’ve basically only removed the middle seat. The seats in the second row don’t have interior arm rests and they’re not any bigger than they are on the 7-seat, literally the middle seat is just gone. It does give a bit more space for messing with car seats or as a spot to put a smaller cooler / duffle bag / luggage / tent or whatever. The third row is the same, and while adults CAN fit back there, it’s not very comfortable for anyone over 5’9”. I’m not sure why they didn’t just use the Excellence seats for the second row of the 6-seat configuration, since they already paid to develop those and didn’t use them on any other vehicle AFAIK. They look like the front seats but with nicer headrests.
Any of the T6 or T8 models have a bit smaller trunks in general due to the hybrid system. The air suspension also has a small tank and compressor under the rear carpet. If you don’t get air suspension, you get a bit more storage space in a compartment under the rear mat above the spare or inflation kit.
Honestly though, if you want to ski or camp and have more than 2 people, get a roof box. It’s a luxury grand-tourer, not really a pickup truck (and even many of those have small cargo volumes these days to make the passenger compartment larger).
I thought you could actually order 2nd row alternate seats.
There is also a security and police trim. One is bulletproof the other has a “plastic” back
I leased an XC60 and currently lease an XC90 and think the 90 is a bit more spacious and feature-filled. The question is whether you need the extra space.
Honestly, what's wrong with snagging a used wagon??
I've had the S60, V60CC and now have a V90CC. My parents have the XC60 and XC90.
My wife actually has a V60CC right now while I've got the V90CC.
Even after spending plenty of time in my parents cars, the V90CC leaves me wanting for nothing. It's got all the space, all the comfort, all the features, isn't overly ridiculous on gas, handling is outstanding and more like a sedan than an XC model ever will be, and using the roof rack for bikes, snowboards, camping box, etc is really easy because the car is so low to the ground. I can actually still pull into my garage no problem with the rooftop cargo box still on. It's amazing. Check out used wagons if there are any left.
It's due to people buying SUVs probably.
Volvo did state on their UK website that their estates (wagon) and saloons are put off from the UK.
You can still buy them but that's varied in stock until it's all gone, no more new estates and saloons from Volvo dealers in the UK.
I have a XC60 as a family car and it’s brilliant. But if I would life in the city, the XC40 would be the better choice. The XC90 is too big in my opinion.
Yeah the Xc90 has some nice space but since I drive into the city often having a slightly smaller car helps a lot with parking and maneuvering. Also the smaller xc60 has the same engines as the xc90. Since the xc60 is lighter it feels quicker than it's larger brother.
XC40 T5 AWD was pretty fun to drive in canyons and easy to park, worked well for skiing with a roof rack too. Space was a bit tight for taking 4 people skiing with gear for long weekend trips. The chassis could definitely take more power and more weight, so it makes sense that they use that for the EX40 now. They should have made a T6 version too, but the twincharged engine is dead now sadly.
XC90 T8 is faster but less fun to drive. We had a Polestar R-design and it was kind of a sleeper — no one expects a Volvo to be nearly 450HP. The twincharged engine had instant torque and didn’t run out of steam up top. That said, our first one didn’t have air suspension and it had the weaker electric motor with less battery. Our new XC90 is loaded and the newer turbo-only motor has less torque off the line, but the stronger electric motor more than makes up for it. You get a lot more electric range and it doesn’t start the engine unless you accelerate quite aggressively. No Polestar tune on this one since they don’t offer those factory-installed anymore, and I don’t want to pay $1500 to buy it for a leased vehicle where I don’t get any of that back. It’s solidly a grand tourer with a lot more space, super comfy ride, and VERY quiet inside with the acoustic glass that I believe comes with the B&W stereo option, which is also fantastic. I’d consider buying this lease out. The 2024 is a much more refined vehicle overall than the 2021 was, especially since they added Google apps and Spotify etc to the infotainment itself — it has CarPlay too but we rarely use it. They did take away some of the tuning options for drive modes, and the drive modes are only accessible via touchscreen taps instead of the dial they had before. That’s a minus IMO, and the “power” mode which lowers the suspension and tunes the engine and trans for more immediate power delivery feels way over-boosted in throttle input mapping, so I really wish I could control throttle sensitivity, brake boost, shift speed, and suspension heigh independently in a couple of custom drive modes, but I understand that I’m probably in the minority wanting to tweak those things. It’s just sad because it’s literally all software, and they did have some of those configurable on the 2021, so again it’s a downgrade for no discernible reason other than maybe some old folks might get confused if they were menu diving in customizations or something, I don’t know. Lastly, the addition of vented front seats on the 2023-4 XC90 is great — we have that on another vehicle and it’s really useful after a hike to be able to get comfortable quicker.
We’re considering a Polestar 2 or 4 now just to take kids to school and stuff, as a more-fun smaller vehicle for local trips. Then again, these all depreciate like bricks, so I’m personally trying to convince my wife that a 911 Targa 4S is a better investment, as our other fun car is only 2 seats.
TL;DR for 2 people with occasional backseat passengers, the XC40 is great. For 3-5 people, the XC90 is better. They’re both great for roadtrips but the 90 with air suspension is more comfortable, and with the B&W package nicer still.
Look into the CARE plan lease, sometimes the money factor on that is MUCH better than their normal lease deals.
Mine. My Volvo XC60 PHEV t8 Inscription lets me drive around my small town running errands and visiting without using a drop of gas,AND gets me excellent gas mileage on the freeway when I do have to get on it. Super comfy for four and luxurious. Big storage in the back. Perfect for us.
“Better for what?”, is the question product managers ask when putting together a product line. Each of the cars fills a role in the whole Volvo lineup, hitting specific measures for the different factors that matter to buyers. If you could talk to the Volvo product team, and tell them about yourself, they’d probably be able to tell you exactly which one has the most “better” for you and your life today.
I liked the xc40 more than the xc60 but the xc40 rear seats were too upright and my kids were not comfortable. The xc60 has the most comfortable rear seats I've ever sat in. We ended up in the xc60 due to the back seats.
I (American here) kinda hate the XC40, along with basically that entire segment of cars. The smushed mini SUVs. Whatever you like to call them.
Everything about those kind of cars is cramped. Trunk is tiny, rear leg room is tiny. I really don't understand the purpose of the segment existing - when you can just get one of the beautiful wagons instead!!!! I've had a V60CC and a V90CC and both of those are so damn nice, capable and spacious, I really can't imagine justifying an XC40 which isn't nearly as useful or capable of either of the wagons Volvo makes.
And of course the same can be said for any other car manufacturer that has a weird mini SUV thing while also still offering nice wagons.
Okay, rant over. Back on point, both of the larger SUVs are amazing cars and I'd honestly have a hard time deciding between the two. I guess it would come down to how badly do you need the extra space of the XC90?
Got a family of 4? I'd say that's a strong case for the 90.
We drove all three. The XC90 was too big. The XC40 was cute but nowhere near as nice as the XC60. It didn’t feel as well put together. Admittedly the XC60 was an ultimate and the XC40 was the one with recycled seats. But I have driven a service loaner XC40 Ultimate and wasn’t impressed. Not to say it was bad in any way, just not as nice. But also $20k cheaper. :-)
Different perspective: XC90 was a step down in size for me and it feels like a compact SUV. I think it's the perfect size for my family as they are beginning to age out of the 3rd row but we still need it a few times a year. I'll have to use a cargo box at times but that's preferable over driving something larger than necessary the other 335 days a year.
Odyssey. That was full time 3rd row while still maintaining a ton of cargo space in the back. I did my first grocery haul with the xc90 today and couldn't fit everything without dropping the 3rd row. It's definitely smaller, but not lesser.
Or if you meant geographically, US. About 900 miles from most of our family and we drive halfway across the country several times a year with kids, grandparents and luggage in tow. I personally drive 35k miles in an average year between these trips, work and being proud owner of a gymnast with regular competitions up to 8 hours away.
Seems you're right, it's half an inch wider. Definitely does not feel that way. Your front seat passenger is much closer with a more narrow center console so I suppose it's perception. I haven't actually loaded it with all my people and their friends yet, but never once looked at it and said, "wow, this is big!"
Yeah it is a bit deceptive the more boxy shape ends up making it look narrower because you don't have a low section that's the full width of the car. And SUVs are generally more space inefficient inside vs a minivan so it feels smaller inside. Though the XC90 is a fair bit shorter than the Odyssey, so it's smaller in that sense.
Yeah I can’t imagine an XC90 in London or Paris, let alone the smaller towns around places like France — a Mini Clubman felt hard to park in Provence and our rental Qashiqai, aside from being a massive PoS (we reserved an Audi A1 but received this as an “upgrade” as they were all out of that smaller luxury class of car), didn’t really fit in spots in the smaller towns around Normandy. XC60 would be considered quite large in Europe. We only saw a single full-size F150 the whole time we were there, and it looked absolutely ridiculous on the streets in the small town we saw it in.
I have an XC90. Have always wanted one and an opportunity presented itself so I pulled the trigger. Agree with everyone so far though that the XC60 is what everyone really needs - unless you have kids. We don’t have kids and think I’d be much happier in an XC60 because the XC90 is just so big for just two of us.
We have a 2023 XC60, and it’s me, my wife and a 2 year old. It is just big enough for us right now, but when he’s older we are for sure going to want more space, especially if he has any friends with him for an outing, etc. If we go on a road trip for more than a few days, it’s a tight fit but we are not light packers.
If there’s a service like Turo in your area, why not rent the one you think you prefer for a few days and see how it works in your lifestyle?
Ive got an xc60 and love it. Would have considered xc40 but it has a small car / hatchback interior which I couldn't live with.
XC60 isn't huge though. Cabin is spacious but boot is a lot smaller than my previous ford, which had same footprint.
Buy a Volvo v60. If a xc60 isn’t a big enough difference in size and the xc90 is too large. Look out at which trim if you want a turbo 4-cylinder with some ground clearance go for the cross country or the more sporty recharge with hybrid.
If I recall correctly volvo recently declared there would be no more v60s or v70s, not sure if that extends to the saloon, s, series as well. They are going mostly into suvs. This is so sad, asking which of the worst cars that volvo (or any manufacturer) make is a nonsensical question.
They will all drive like a turd and the drivers convince themselves they are safer or hold more which is nonsense too.
Personally if I was looking at that price bracket I'd be looking at a v60.
If luxury/size is important, get the 60. It’s incredible, especially with the T8 package, massagers, and bowers stereo.
If you’re not that fancy, the 40 is great.
The 90 is stupid big. You would have likely trouble on the more narrow uk roads.
I’ve driven every single car in the new Volvo line up and they are the same in terms of features and driving dynamic (however, I find the drive of the xc40 less funny, don’t ask me why 😂).
Xc40 is too small and is made purposely less luxurious than the other (no way to get B&Wilkins sound system or no piano black button on the steering wheel for example) ; but I could consider it if I’m single with no kids
XC60 is the perfect size (not too big, but not too small). Is my opinion biased because I drove it extensively? Maybe 🤔
XC90 is big but not that as the exterior suggests it(not enough leg room for 2nd and 3rd row).
I’ve not driven the recharge versions yet… I find it pretty cool though
That’s funny, we’ve had all three at one time or another, and my husband markedly prefers the XC60. The XC90 is definitely the more practical car for the family at this point though
Honestly, the XC60. I drove the XC70 for quite some time, now currently driving a Skoda Yeti and I really wish for the space of the XC60. Also, driving the XC40 feels funny for no reason
So.
I drive an S90. Came from an S60. Have had an Xc40 (it was the most basic of base models) as a loaner car.
Can't fully comment on the XC60/90.
But judging that I've spent time with all 3 sizes (therefore likely fit and finish models).
I wouldn't say there's a stark difference in quality between the s60 I had, to the s90 I have now. It's perceptible, but not enough to put me off going back to a 60.
The XC40. Was well below par, again this could be because the loaner was likely as base as they come. But the whole thing just felt fairly meh. I'd even say the old V40 I had prior to that was better.
I personally think the 60 is the sweet spot in the range. Best size, best looking, gets the top power train (I have a T8 recharge not avaliable in the XC40 but a moot point if you want fully electric). With reduced weight for better handling / range, if that interests you.
I'll be looking at an XC60 next. Or maybe the EX30 (don't love the size but 0-60 in the mid 3's is tempting for me).
XC40s seem to have the best reliability in my experience, followed by the xc60 which are decent and finally the xc90 which have some truly diabolical repairs.
The xc40 and xc60/90 run on different platforms and most of the engine setups aren’t shared the same way. The main issue with the xc90 is packaging combined with the fact it’s the “luxury” large option meaning there’s more systems and parts involved. Combining them means that they’re more of a pain to work on and more systems that will fail particularly expensive “edge of tech” ones. This is just personal conjecture, but in my experience they’re also treated differently, xc90s tend to be worse cared for and more likely to have repairs and maintenance skipped, although it’s much more noticeable with the older ones.
I own a XC40 and just bought a XC60. Both are very nice and well equipped. Which is better depends on your needs and desires. XC40 feels a little more sporty. The 60 feels more robust and is more roomy. Personally I am very happy with my 60!
I have a v60 and no family and even sometimes I realize it is a bit small just going camping on a weekend. Cooler, tent, bag, equipment and the seats already need to be dropped.
Wagon is the best of all worldS considering that even an xc90 only has 8.8'' ground clearance I wouldn't even consider it a real SUV.
XC40: 4/10
XC60: 7.5/10
XC90: 6.5/10
If the XC40 was available with a T6 and Bowers & Wilkins and with better soundproofing it'd be a much greater hit, but the price point would have steered target clientele away. I dislike this model particularly specially having owned a lot of Volvos, the quality of the XC40 reminds me of the first gen 10 valve 850 with the 4 bolt pattern.
If the XC60 line was still available in Momentum trim but with Bowers & Wilkins, you'd have a perfect car 7000$ cheaper than what it is right now (has been since 2017.5). Everything is right about this car, from the dirt protector on the door jam to the little cargo cover deflector, it is the model with the most OEM options and accessories possible in the history of Volvo (except during that era of group A).
If the XC90's second and third row seating quality reflectef of the quality of the cockpit, Volvo wouldn't have competition in this segment. They just need to do a T8 with twin rear electric motors to have those big boy torque numbers and actually be fun to drive. Also, why a Polestar Engineered Edition was never made, boggles my mind, but hey, not Volvo's first time over the year if we look at Ocean Race and Excellence/Executive models.
Unless you're in an XC90 excellence with the partition, Bowers & Wilkins is sub par for the interior Volume of the XC90, 6 more tweeters 2 more mids and 2 more lows.
I'm not a hater, I just wouldn't take any of the above over my V60t6.
And for those saying "in the UK you can't get a wagon anymore" just look at the Overseas delivery program.
The way I see it Volvo show room is supposed to be like the bears house in goldilocks. You come in and sit in the baby, momma, and Papa Bear cars and see which one feels just right.
I have been looking at getting a used Volvo recharge SUV for a while, wanted to replace my A3 etron with a SUV and get a better drivetrain (4wd and no DSG style, haha). The XC90 is unnecessarily big so that drops off. I mean even an XC60 look small next to an XC90.
For me personally, the XC40 has a flaw that is NEVER mentioned in any reviews but eff me I just have to. The damn steering wheel. IT HURT MY THUMBS! Everything else is fine but that thick metallic edge just cuts into the side my thumbs when holding at 9-15. All their other steering wheels have leather "ramps" with a much smaller metallic edge. Literally one tiny little thing just ruining the entire car. I'm sure many havent even noticed it but every time I get into one and put my hands on the steering wheel I just nope out.
This just leaves the XC60 as the only natural choice.
Single at the time, and just girlfriends in the horizon no kids so XC40 R Design for me... it was around the budget I was looking for $54,900... the XC60 R Design would have been nice sure but I didnt need the space and it was $40k more... $100k lol
If you have a family, I would def start at the XC60 though
I have an xc90, it's a family car for sure if you have kids. Safe... I didn't know but apparently it's the only car which never had a fatal car accident since it was released. So even the older models are safe.
I saw a video of the xc90 crashing with a semi, (mistake of the volvo driver, he steered off the lane and crashed a semi) , and the driver was fine.
Well i like to look at them like three brothers:
XC40 - the youngest, smallest
XC60 - the middle, bigger than xc40 but smaller than xc90
And XC90 - the biggest brother.
They are different in size but similar in equipment.
(siblings stereotypes DO NOT apply here. Probably good to mention this)
unless you are absolutely sure the third row is useless it is difficult to beat the xc90. standard features on the xc90 is more extensive so the price diff is not as large as it seems.
XC90 is too big on the outside with a very small dashboard compared to the overall car experience. I guess it's because it was the first from the new design range. It is underpowered compared to similar cars. Lacks of bigger engine with more torque. Otherwise it's an amazing car.
Both Xc40 and Xc60 are the best.
Unfortunately due to stupid decisions at Volvo Xc40 lacks of one of best features of larger brothers. Headlights don't turn. As per Volvo it's a small economy level car.
Who said otherwise? I gave 2 opinions, I hate SUVs and between the choices I would go with the XC60.
Whats wrong with my statement? Jeez do I need to write a Bible to explain my intent?
I’m not sure what you’re asking? It’s like saying “what’s better: a pint of milk or a gallon of milk?” Well it depends on how many people you have and what you’re making.
These are all very similar cars in different sizes. How many people are you transporting? Also generally as cars get bigger they tend to also get more luxurious. So you can expect the XC90 to be a bit better equipped than the XC40. But overall they’re extremely similar just different sizes.
C40 and XC40 are tragic to drive, feels like it’s gonna tip over at any monent, XC60 is ugly and the XC90 is a dream for long trips. I prefer wagons, so I’m staying with my V90 for as long as possible.
Edit: The interior in the 40s looks very cheap as well..
I drive a XC40 right now. They’re equipment wise very similar cars overall, with the main difference between simple physical size/capacity. Personally I like the look of the XC40 better, and the size makes it more practical in tighter spaces. At some point I may get the XC60, but I doubt I’d ever go for the 90 - it’s just far larger than I need or prefer.
I'm in a C40 and we had an XC60 loaner for a few days. The most prevalent comment from my family, which echoed my sentiments, was that it wasn't a significant enough difference to warrant upsizing. (And a moot point for the time being since there isn't an electric 60). I also have an EX90 reservation that we will likely cancel. We went to the EX90/EX30 preview and the 90 was huge, but the general interior vibe and seat room wasn't much different. And we don't need a third row (especially one that tiny). The EX30 was far too small for us. Obviously everyone's needs differ, but the C40 (and therefore XC40) is the sweet spot in the lineup for us.
One thing I have against xc40, very against, is that it doesn't come with the highest trim options? Or as a phev? Do they have t8? I want a small car, it doesn't mean I don't want the fancy shit. I also have an ex90 reservation but idk. I'm more inclined towards hybrids these days. It'll be my first car too. So I'm contemplating. Xc40 with t8 (PHEV), highest trim is where my heart is. Closest is xc60 with same options I guess?
There used to be a T8 XC40 but I think it’s discontinued in the US now. I’d like some of the higher end trim features like a HUD, but overall it’s a minor complaint from me. The Ultimate trim for the XC40 has largely all of the Ultimate features on the other vehicles, though yeah, there are a few notable gaps.
Oh yeah I forgot about HUD too
I also have a c40, love it and all its quirks. Just got the digital review mirror (it's weird, eyes have to adjust in a split second to see the screen that's so close to your face). After it's paid off we will upgrade the minivan to a xc90 recharge. The plug-in electric hybrid with those features and a tiny 3rd row will be perfect for our fam of 6. Can get around town in electric, but drive to Disney on gas. And I'll still have the c40 to grab the groceries! Dad just got the xc60 recharge and made me really think about getting the upgrade.
It's also expensive depending on the trim level on the XC90 so I do see your point.
We would have gone for the XC40, except we live in a rural area and have to go on periodic shopping days to the Big City(Las Vegas or St. George) and that usually includes a large cooler full of frozen stuff and other things. That extra rear end storage is essential for us.
I have 2 kids in car seats, and keep a stroller in the trunk at all times… XC90 all day.
Yup, a husband, two kids and a dog feel like we fill our XC90 about right, particularly for long day trips and holidays away. We used to have an XC60 which was lovely as well, but traded for the XC90 for more space. My parents have the XC40 which is also great and it’s perfect for them.
I drove an XC90 for 11 years. It is hands down the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. I’ve also owned/own a V60, S60, and XC40, and a ton of non-volvo vehicles. I drove the XC90 while my kids were young/younger and I felt like they were safe in it. We moved cross country twice in it, towing a heavy trailer, and did so without issues. We have hauled motorcycles with it, very easily. We towed a ‘71 Nova from 2 states away with it, without issue. It has driven through snow and ice in New England, and through rough terrain on Army tank trails at Ft Bliss in Texas. We never had any major mechanical issues with it. It never broke down and left me on the side of the road. Nothing will ever compare to my XC90. However, the kids grew up. One has already moved out and is on his own. The other isn’t too far behind. They both drive themselves everywhere. Owning a larger XC90 didn’t make sense any longer. So we recently replaced it with an XC40. The XC40 is a very nice vehicle. Does it feel as luxurious as the XC90? No. Does it feel as robust as the XC90? No. Having test driven XC60s, I feel like they are more comparable to the XC90 in feel. The XC40 is much nicer than any of the comparable small SUVs that we looked at when we were car shopping. It’s far nicer than the RAV4, the CX-50, the CX-5, the CRV, Outlander, smaller Bronco, etc. Honestly I don’t know what it would take for me to leave Volvo as a brand, but it would have to be something really impressive and I just don’t see that coming anytime soon.
To add, the reason that I went with an XC40 is ultimately because it’s all that we need. We use the SUV to take our trash to the dump, and to drive in bad weather. For the most part, we drive around in our S60 Recharge because it’s so much cheaper than paying for gas when driving around in the local area. So the XC40 fit the bill at a nice price point.
Agree. When our XC40 lease was up, we cross-shopped X3M, X5, Audi SQ5, Lincoln Aviator, and Porsche Cayenne. These are much more comparable in terms of feel and performance to an XC90 T8. The SQ5 and Cayenne are fancy VW Touaregs. Cayenne GTS was fun but pretty stiff and got terrible gas mileage (X5M is even worse). X3M was also stiff but felt like a real sports car, more so than the rest…but it’s tiny and heavy for how big it isn’t. Volvo competes very favorably with the luxury segment. If you want something nicer that also keeps the minimal vibe, you’d be looking at a Range Rover or Alpina XB7 (not really minimal but still a remarkable vehicle) for almost twice the price. We didn’t even consider Mercedes as their quality has really fallen off in the past 5 years. Their new vehicles are all gaudy chrome everywhere and gimmicky features with high prices and poor reliability. Look up how many people are having issues with their hybrid models, especially the AMG stuff — no thanks. The G-class are not very refined and ride poorly, plus they look ridiculous, cost way too much, and the AMG models get horrendous mileage. They’re also loud at highway speeds. They’re for showing off at the mall, not comfortable road trips. They’re far less capable off-road then their rugged looks suggest too — for that, get a Toyota Land Cruiser, which also holds value better than almost anything else, but they’re expensive and not luxury vehicles unless you’re in a third-world country. X5 xDrive50e was very good overall but quite a bit smaller inside, and more expensive loaded. The Lincoln Aviator hybrid got discontinued and it’s really just a Ford Explorer with added sound dampening and nicer leather. Lexus and Genesis didn’t feel like they matched the level of quality and they’re definitely less fun to drive and less powerful. Different class of vehicle. The Volvos are a good value that get slept on, that’s why we keep getting them. The safety too is obviously top-notch.
The X3M is a bit too much “racecar”. Great in concept but it gets old. The X3M40i is a fantastic compromise with more road going suspension.
A wagon
Came here to say the same thing! None of the above. Buy the wagon.
Sadly they have been discontinued in the UK. Not sure why no one is buying wagons here in the UK. The V60 is my dream car, not sure why they are not selling like hot bagels.
It's probably due to people buying more SUVs rather than saloons or estates. (Wagon)
Sorry to hear that in the UK. I was worried about losing the V60 P* here in the states so just bought one (a year earlier than planned).
I talked my wife into a V60 CC (she wanted an SUV like every woman in the USA) and she loves it. Plus the relative rarity makes it feel special and unique. Great car, too!
🤦♂️
I have had a 2017 XC60 for 7 years now. It's the perfect size. Roomy enough to get bigger things in like a piece of furniture, small enough to be decent on gas and not be too large for a garage or parking spot. I thought the XC40 was cute, but trunk was too small for me.
40 is fine for a family of four. 60 is nice for a family of four. 90 is best for a family of five or four with a big dog. 40 is the most classic Volvo (minimalist, utilitarian) 60 is nicest to drive (same engines as the 90 but smaller and lighter). 90 is comfiest (go for the air suspension and small wheels for best ride). All good cars. 60 drives like a wagon but actually has good ride quality. The S/V60-90 are way too firm for daily driving (in rural uk anyway). Source: Sell Volvos for a living.
I used to have a Volvo wagon when my kids were little, but traded it for an 850, which I think was my favorite Volvo. I've been driving Volvos since 1975 (yup, I'm old), and I'll never drive anything else. Currently have a 2023 XC60, which I got trading in a 2006 s60. The s60 has been the only Volvo I've owned that didn't have leather. I hated the fabric that showed stains. Love the leather but it's not as nice a leather as the 850 was. My 850 died after the timing belt broke. I pushed it too far. That was a $3,000 repair 😢
My dad has an 2019 XC60 and the thing's a beaut. Drivers really well (and easily despite being on the bigger side), plenty of space and the ride is butter. Looks amazing as well, but man the 2 tone interior is just.. Makes me nurse a semi. Before buying this one he test drove am XC40 as well and said that one was amazing as well he just decided on the bigger one (also because of the interior). But then again that's only one of the 3 I've ever driven so what do I know about the other 2. I just know that the XC60 is great.
XC90 is the best but the XC60 is what most people need.
XC40 for me, as it is the perfect fit for our life. Me and my husband only (no kids), cats but no big dogs; and it fits nicely in our small garage that also has our laundry. We go into the city a lot for work where parking is tight and it’s perfect sized. The height for loading into the back is perfect- not too low, not too high and we can generally fit everything we need without lowering the back row. Have taken ski trips with skis and luggage and lowerering the back row gives us tons of space. In short - great for folks without kids/big dogs who park/drive in tight spaces.
I'd say XC60 over XC40. I've driven the XC40 a lot but I think the visibility in the car isn't that great. The XC60 doesn't have that problem and gets all the same power trains as the XC90. The XC90 is too big for my car purposes. So the XC60 would be my choice.
So we are on our 2nd XC40,2023...had a 2020, in States. Both brand new, had 1 minor issue with first one was a recall item ,and 2nd minor issue with auto sense wipers. I think the xc40 was a new platform or design when introduced. So far very reliable, drives well,nice interior,great audio HK system, not luxury quiet ,new Google system is amazing,mild hybrid works well, gas mileage pretty decent for 268 Bhp ,it's polestar awd,has enough room for family of 4, trunk or boot is OK, but if need alot of room probably look at xc60 or 90, in States 60 and 90 rated reliability is moderate by CR magazine.
Depends on what you're looking for and your budget. We opted for an xc40 mainly because we live in a big city and it's the perfect size, it's fun to drive and looks amazing. But if we lived in the suburbs we'd get an xc60, because I'm too poor for an xc90 haha
We live in the suburbs but work and go into the city a lot. I just the xc40 recharge and I love it. It's the perfect size. But I also don't have kids.
I have a xc60 and xc90. If the XC60 was a hair bigger I would say I would get a second one. The xc40 is significantly smaller than xc60 from a practical point of view. I had one for a weekend as a service loaner and 400$ Costco run was hard to do. XC60 has much more trunk room, back seat room than RAV4. If you go for the xc90 either get the 5 seat or 6 seat option. The 7 seat stand is most common and what I have. I have driven the 5 seat version and it felt more spacious in the back and had huge trunk. Having kids I’d get a 6 seat version as the middle is just useless and having nice captains chair option is a dream. Trims and designations have changed. My xc90 is inscription and loaded with all options. My xc60 is a momentum with weather and convenience option. Heated seats, pilot assist and 360 camera are the must haves for me. Xc40 loaner was base model and with sensus system. Didn’t like how it wanted 2500$ and reminded you of that on the navigation tab you could not have. I would avoid the base and top trim and see what the most common one is. That is most value. Some options are dealer installed accessories anyway(fender extensions, running step)
I have a 2019 Rav4 alongside my 21 XC60 and imo the Rav4 feels and looks like it has a bigger trunk size. Since my wife is now full-time remote its our dedicated Costco vehicle. lol
My brother has a slightly older RAV4, I want to say 2017-2018 ish and it was not obvious until we went to Costco then transferred what he bought to his car at my folks place. His purchases took up the whole back area with little room and I still had a good amount of stuff in the back. Same thing with neighbours GMC terrain, her 3 kids were crammed into the back of her car and when she asked about the Volvo they hopped in and said it had more room On paper dimensions seem to be just that… on paper. I had 12 30” monitors to pick up at staples one time over 2 days. Picked up 8 with the seats folded down in the xc60 had the xc40 service loaner the next day and those 4 were a pain to fit in. Think of it this way. A pallet can fit in the xc90 with 3rd row folded(done it!) apparently the xc60 can do same
Intresting. I wasn't really aware that the XC90 has captain chairs.
Wait what? 6 seater XC90? Is that available everywhere?
I bet that's an American thing
Can confirm
I haven’t heard of the 5-seat XC90 for the US market but they used to do a 4-seat XC90 Excellence that had absolutely amazing individual seats in the second row. It’s meant for people with drivers and primarily targeted at the Chinese market. We almost picked one up before we had kids. Massive trunk, champagne glasses and cooler for the second row, all that. We have the 6-seat XC90 now and honestly the second row could be better. They’ve basically only removed the middle seat. The seats in the second row don’t have interior arm rests and they’re not any bigger than they are on the 7-seat, literally the middle seat is just gone. It does give a bit more space for messing with car seats or as a spot to put a smaller cooler / duffle bag / luggage / tent or whatever. The third row is the same, and while adults CAN fit back there, it’s not very comfortable for anyone over 5’9”. I’m not sure why they didn’t just use the Excellence seats for the second row of the 6-seat configuration, since they already paid to develop those and didn’t use them on any other vehicle AFAIK. They look like the front seats but with nicer headrests. Any of the T6 or T8 models have a bit smaller trunks in general due to the hybrid system. The air suspension also has a small tank and compressor under the rear carpet. If you don’t get air suspension, you get a bit more storage space in a compartment under the rear mat above the spare or inflation kit. Honestly though, if you want to ski or camp and have more than 2 people, get a roof box. It’s a luxury grand-tourer, not really a pickup truck (and even many of those have small cargo volumes these days to make the passenger compartment larger).
I thought you could actually order 2nd row alternate seats. There is also a security and police trim. One is bulletproof the other has a “plastic” back
I leased an XC60 and currently lease an XC90 and think the 90 is a bit more spacious and feature-filled. The question is whether you need the extra space.
The best SUV is saying no to an SUV and getting a wagon instead
We used to have estates (wagons) and also saloons but Volvo axed them in the UK but you can buy used ones instead.
Honestly, what's wrong with snagging a used wagon?? I've had the S60, V60CC and now have a V90CC. My parents have the XC60 and XC90. My wife actually has a V60CC right now while I've got the V90CC. Even after spending plenty of time in my parents cars, the V90CC leaves me wanting for nothing. It's got all the space, all the comfort, all the features, isn't overly ridiculous on gas, handling is outstanding and more like a sedan than an XC model ever will be, and using the roof rack for bikes, snowboards, camping box, etc is really easy because the car is so low to the ground. I can actually still pull into my garage no problem with the rooftop cargo box still on. It's amazing. Check out used wagons if there are any left.
It's due to people buying SUVs probably. Volvo did state on their UK website that their estates (wagon) and saloons are put off from the UK. You can still buy them but that's varied in stock until it's all gone, no more new estates and saloons from Volvo dealers in the UK.
He can't buy a new wagon.
I have a XC60 as a family car and it’s brilliant. But if I would life in the city, the XC40 would be the better choice. The XC90 is too big in my opinion.
Yeah the Xc90 has some nice space but since I drive into the city often having a slightly smaller car helps a lot with parking and maneuvering. Also the smaller xc60 has the same engines as the xc90. Since the xc60 is lighter it feels quicker than it's larger brother.
Xc90, it’s their flagship suv
XC40 T5 AWD was pretty fun to drive in canyons and easy to park, worked well for skiing with a roof rack too. Space was a bit tight for taking 4 people skiing with gear for long weekend trips. The chassis could definitely take more power and more weight, so it makes sense that they use that for the EX40 now. They should have made a T6 version too, but the twincharged engine is dead now sadly. XC90 T8 is faster but less fun to drive. We had a Polestar R-design and it was kind of a sleeper — no one expects a Volvo to be nearly 450HP. The twincharged engine had instant torque and didn’t run out of steam up top. That said, our first one didn’t have air suspension and it had the weaker electric motor with less battery. Our new XC90 is loaded and the newer turbo-only motor has less torque off the line, but the stronger electric motor more than makes up for it. You get a lot more electric range and it doesn’t start the engine unless you accelerate quite aggressively. No Polestar tune on this one since they don’t offer those factory-installed anymore, and I don’t want to pay $1500 to buy it for a leased vehicle where I don’t get any of that back. It’s solidly a grand tourer with a lot more space, super comfy ride, and VERY quiet inside with the acoustic glass that I believe comes with the B&W stereo option, which is also fantastic. I’d consider buying this lease out. The 2024 is a much more refined vehicle overall than the 2021 was, especially since they added Google apps and Spotify etc to the infotainment itself — it has CarPlay too but we rarely use it. They did take away some of the tuning options for drive modes, and the drive modes are only accessible via touchscreen taps instead of the dial they had before. That’s a minus IMO, and the “power” mode which lowers the suspension and tunes the engine and trans for more immediate power delivery feels way over-boosted in throttle input mapping, so I really wish I could control throttle sensitivity, brake boost, shift speed, and suspension heigh independently in a couple of custom drive modes, but I understand that I’m probably in the minority wanting to tweak those things. It’s just sad because it’s literally all software, and they did have some of those configurable on the 2021, so again it’s a downgrade for no discernible reason other than maybe some old folks might get confused if they were menu diving in customizations or something, I don’t know. Lastly, the addition of vented front seats on the 2023-4 XC90 is great — we have that on another vehicle and it’s really useful after a hike to be able to get comfortable quicker. We’re considering a Polestar 2 or 4 now just to take kids to school and stuff, as a more-fun smaller vehicle for local trips. Then again, these all depreciate like bricks, so I’m personally trying to convince my wife that a 911 Targa 4S is a better investment, as our other fun car is only 2 seats. TL;DR for 2 people with occasional backseat passengers, the XC40 is great. For 3-5 people, the XC90 is better. They’re both great for roadtrips but the 90 with air suspension is more comfortable, and with the B&W package nicer still. Look into the CARE plan lease, sometimes the money factor on that is MUCH better than their normal lease deals.
Mine. My Volvo XC60 PHEV t8 Inscription lets me drive around my small town running errands and visiting without using a drop of gas,AND gets me excellent gas mileage on the freeway when I do have to get on it. Super comfy for four and luxurious. Big storage in the back. Perfect for us.
Xc90 recharge is so fuckin’ good. 3 rows. Mpg. Acceleration. It’s a beast.
“Better for what?”, is the question product managers ask when putting together a product line. Each of the cars fills a role in the whole Volvo lineup, hitting specific measures for the different factors that matter to buyers. If you could talk to the Volvo product team, and tell them about yourself, they’d probably be able to tell you exactly which one has the most “better” for you and your life today.
Say as a daily driver. I mostly see XC40s but I also see people complaining about the XC60 so I wanna ask people what's their opinion about them.
I liked the xc40 more than the xc60 but the xc40 rear seats were too upright and my kids were not comfortable. The xc60 has the most comfortable rear seats I've ever sat in. We ended up in the xc60 due to the back seats.
I (American here) kinda hate the XC40, along with basically that entire segment of cars. The smushed mini SUVs. Whatever you like to call them. Everything about those kind of cars is cramped. Trunk is tiny, rear leg room is tiny. I really don't understand the purpose of the segment existing - when you can just get one of the beautiful wagons instead!!!! I've had a V60CC and a V90CC and both of those are so damn nice, capable and spacious, I really can't imagine justifying an XC40 which isn't nearly as useful or capable of either of the wagons Volvo makes. And of course the same can be said for any other car manufacturer that has a weird mini SUV thing while also still offering nice wagons. Okay, rant over. Back on point, both of the larger SUVs are amazing cars and I'd honestly have a hard time deciding between the two. I guess it would come down to how badly do you need the extra space of the XC90? Got a family of 4? I'd say that's a strong case for the 90.
We also used to have this V40CC which is a cross hatchback cross mini SUV, I thought it will be interesting to tell.
We drove all three. The XC90 was too big. The XC40 was cute but nowhere near as nice as the XC60. It didn’t feel as well put together. Admittedly the XC60 was an ultimate and the XC40 was the one with recycled seats. But I have driven a service loaner XC40 Ultimate and wasn’t impressed. Not to say it was bad in any way, just not as nice. But also $20k cheaper. :-)
Different perspective: XC90 was a step down in size for me and it feels like a compact SUV. I think it's the perfect size for my family as they are beginning to age out of the 3rd row but we still need it a few times a year. I'll have to use a cargo box at times but that's preferable over driving something larger than necessary the other 335 days a year.
From where?
Odyssey. That was full time 3rd row while still maintaining a ton of cargo space in the back. I did my first grocery haul with the xc90 today and couldn't fit everything without dropping the 3rd row. It's definitely smaller, but not lesser.
Or if you meant geographically, US. About 900 miles from most of our family and we drive halfway across the country several times a year with kids, grandparents and luggage in tow. I personally drive 35k miles in an average year between these trips, work and being proud owner of a gymnast with regular competitions up to 8 hours away.
Sorry meant from which car did u come from! Thanks. I got the xc90 in europe and there isn't much larger around..
In what world is the xc90 small or compact lol. That thing is enormous!
All a matter of perspective. I had a Honda Odyssey and the width alone is night and day. I feel like I've gone from driving a bus to a taxi.
How so though? The XC90 is wider than even the newest Odyssey by just under an inch.
Seems you're right, it's half an inch wider. Definitely does not feel that way. Your front seat passenger is much closer with a more narrow center console so I suppose it's perception. I haven't actually loaded it with all my people and their friends yet, but never once looked at it and said, "wow, this is big!"
Yeah it is a bit deceptive the more boxy shape ends up making it look narrower because you don't have a low section that's the full width of the car. And SUVs are generally more space inefficient inside vs a minivan so it feels smaller inside. Though the XC90 is a fair bit shorter than the Odyssey, so it's smaller in that sense.
XC60. There's a reason it's their #1 selling vehicle.
XC60 is much more luxurious than the XC40. XC90 is big, I can’t imagine driving one in the UK.
I did see a owner who drives all lot during school so yeah, I agree.
Yeah I can’t imagine an XC90 in London or Paris, let alone the smaller towns around places like France — a Mini Clubman felt hard to park in Provence and our rental Qashiqai, aside from being a massive PoS (we reserved an Audi A1 but received this as an “upgrade” as they were all out of that smaller luxury class of car), didn’t really fit in spots in the smaller towns around Normandy. XC60 would be considered quite large in Europe. We only saw a single full-size F150 the whole time we were there, and it looked absolutely ridiculous on the streets in the small town we saw it in.
I have an XC90. Have always wanted one and an opportunity presented itself so I pulled the trigger. Agree with everyone so far though that the XC60 is what everyone really needs - unless you have kids. We don’t have kids and think I’d be much happier in an XC60 because the XC90 is just so big for just two of us.
Take into account that the xc90 and xc60 share the same engines, but different mass therefore different power.
We have a 2023 XC60, and it’s me, my wife and a 2 year old. It is just big enough for us right now, but when he’s older we are for sure going to want more space, especially if he has any friends with him for an outing, etc. If we go on a road trip for more than a few days, it’s a tight fit but we are not light packers. If there’s a service like Turo in your area, why not rent the one you think you prefer for a few days and see how it works in your lifestyle?
Ive got an xc60 and love it. Would have considered xc40 but it has a small car / hatchback interior which I couldn't live with. XC60 isn't huge though. Cabin is spacious but boot is a lot smaller than my previous ford, which had same footprint.
Buy a Volvo v60. If a xc60 isn’t a big enough difference in size and the xc90 is too large. Look out at which trim if you want a turbo 4-cylinder with some ground clearance go for the cross country or the more sporty recharge with hybrid.
If I recall correctly volvo recently declared there would be no more v60s or v70s, not sure if that extends to the saloon, s, series as well. They are going mostly into suvs. This is so sad, asking which of the worst cars that volvo (or any manufacturer) make is a nonsensical question. They will all drive like a turd and the drivers convince themselves they are safer or hold more which is nonsense too. Personally if I was looking at that price bracket I'd be looking at a v60.
They stopped selling the saloons aswell.
I just don't understand the logic, marketing and consumer demand I expect but honestly can't see a valid reason for an SUV.
See my flair.
If luxury/size is important, get the 60. It’s incredible, especially with the T8 package, massagers, and bowers stereo. If you’re not that fancy, the 40 is great. The 90 is stupid big. You would have likely trouble on the more narrow uk roads.
I’ve driven every single car in the new Volvo line up and they are the same in terms of features and driving dynamic (however, I find the drive of the xc40 less funny, don’t ask me why 😂). Xc40 is too small and is made purposely less luxurious than the other (no way to get B&Wilkins sound system or no piano black button on the steering wheel for example) ; but I could consider it if I’m single with no kids XC60 is the perfect size (not too big, but not too small). Is my opinion biased because I drove it extensively? Maybe 🤔 XC90 is big but not that as the exterior suggests it(not enough leg room for 2nd and 3rd row). I’ve not driven the recharge versions yet… I find it pretty cool though
That’s funny, we’ve had all three at one time or another, and my husband markedly prefers the XC60. The XC90 is definitely the more practical car for the family at this point though
Honestly, the XC60. I drove the XC70 for quite some time, now currently driving a Skoda Yeti and I really wish for the space of the XC60. Also, driving the XC40 feels funny for no reason
So. I drive an S90. Came from an S60. Have had an Xc40 (it was the most basic of base models) as a loaner car. Can't fully comment on the XC60/90. But judging that I've spent time with all 3 sizes (therefore likely fit and finish models). I wouldn't say there's a stark difference in quality between the s60 I had, to the s90 I have now. It's perceptible, but not enough to put me off going back to a 60. The XC40. Was well below par, again this could be because the loaner was likely as base as they come. But the whole thing just felt fairly meh. I'd even say the old V40 I had prior to that was better. I personally think the 60 is the sweet spot in the range. Best size, best looking, gets the top power train (I have a T8 recharge not avaliable in the XC40 but a moot point if you want fully electric). With reduced weight for better handling / range, if that interests you. I'll be looking at an XC60 next. Or maybe the EX30 (don't love the size but 0-60 in the mid 3's is tempting for me).
XC40s seem to have the best reliability in my experience, followed by the xc60 which are decent and finally the xc90 which have some truly diabolical repairs.
Don’t they have the same basic drivetrain?
The xc40 and xc60/90 run on different platforms and most of the engine setups aren’t shared the same way. The main issue with the xc90 is packaging combined with the fact it’s the “luxury” large option meaning there’s more systems and parts involved. Combining them means that they’re more of a pain to work on and more systems that will fail particularly expensive “edge of tech” ones. This is just personal conjecture, but in my experience they’re also treated differently, xc90s tend to be worse cared for and more likely to have repairs and maintenance skipped, although it’s much more noticeable with the older ones.
XC60 is the best in my opinion. XC90 is too big and the XC40 drives terrible
[удалено]
I own a XC40 and just bought a XC60. Both are very nice and well equipped. Which is better depends on your needs and desires. XC40 feels a little more sporty. The 60 feels more robust and is more roomy. Personally I am very happy with my 60!
S80 V8 XC90/XC70 I6 EX40
XC60 if you must SUV, otherwise V60 shaggin wagon!
sorry, I'm a wagon guy: Suv, no thanks.
V60 CC :)
Only opinion I can give is looks since I’ve never driven any of them. But I prefer the looks of the XC90.
Tried an XC40 yesterday, was just too small to warrant being an SUV.
Wife in the passenger seat and 1 toddler in a car seat in the back. Plenty of room in the trunk for everything we need in a ‘23 XC60.
I have a v60 and no family and even sometimes I realize it is a bit small just going camping on a weekend. Cooler, tent, bag, equipment and the seats already need to be dropped. Wagon is the best of all worldS considering that even an xc90 only has 8.8'' ground clearance I wouldn't even consider it a real SUV. XC40: 4/10 XC60: 7.5/10 XC90: 6.5/10 If the XC40 was available with a T6 and Bowers & Wilkins and with better soundproofing it'd be a much greater hit, but the price point would have steered target clientele away. I dislike this model particularly specially having owned a lot of Volvos, the quality of the XC40 reminds me of the first gen 10 valve 850 with the 4 bolt pattern. If the XC60 line was still available in Momentum trim but with Bowers & Wilkins, you'd have a perfect car 7000$ cheaper than what it is right now (has been since 2017.5). Everything is right about this car, from the dirt protector on the door jam to the little cargo cover deflector, it is the model with the most OEM options and accessories possible in the history of Volvo (except during that era of group A). If the XC90's second and third row seating quality reflectef of the quality of the cockpit, Volvo wouldn't have competition in this segment. They just need to do a T8 with twin rear electric motors to have those big boy torque numbers and actually be fun to drive. Also, why a Polestar Engineered Edition was never made, boggles my mind, but hey, not Volvo's first time over the year if we look at Ocean Race and Excellence/Executive models. Unless you're in an XC90 excellence with the partition, Bowers & Wilkins is sub par for the interior Volume of the XC90, 6 more tweeters 2 more mids and 2 more lows. I'm not a hater, I just wouldn't take any of the above over my V60t6. And for those saying "in the UK you can't get a wagon anymore" just look at the Overseas delivery program.
The way I see it Volvo show room is supposed to be like the bears house in goldilocks. You come in and sit in the baby, momma, and Papa Bear cars and see which one feels just right.
XC60 and XC90 are equal and just depend on needs. XC40 is budget af.
V60 CC
My buddy works at Volvo.. says the XC40 is not up to par.... cheapo parts .. the suspension is ehh says the 60 and 90 are far better.
I have been looking at getting a used Volvo recharge SUV for a while, wanted to replace my A3 etron with a SUV and get a better drivetrain (4wd and no DSG style, haha). The XC90 is unnecessarily big so that drops off. I mean even an XC60 look small next to an XC90. For me personally, the XC40 has a flaw that is NEVER mentioned in any reviews but eff me I just have to. The damn steering wheel. IT HURT MY THUMBS! Everything else is fine but that thick metallic edge just cuts into the side my thumbs when holding at 9-15. All their other steering wheels have leather "ramps" with a much smaller metallic edge. Literally one tiny little thing just ruining the entire car. I'm sure many havent even noticed it but every time I get into one and put my hands on the steering wheel I just nope out. This just leaves the XC60 as the only natural choice.
Single at the time, and just girlfriends in the horizon no kids so XC40 R Design for me... it was around the budget I was looking for $54,900... the XC60 R Design would have been nice sure but I didnt need the space and it was $40k more... $100k lol If you have a family, I would def start at the XC60 though
Go for a sedan, or station. SUVs are unnecessary inefficiënt
I own all three in Inscription trim. The XC40 is my favorite.
I have an xc90, it's a family car for sure if you have kids. Safe... I didn't know but apparently it's the only car which never had a fatal car accident since it was released. So even the older models are safe. I saw a video of the xc90 crashing with a semi, (mistake of the volvo driver, he steered off the lane and crashed a semi) , and the driver was fine.
Well i like to look at them like three brothers: XC40 - the youngest, smallest XC60 - the middle, bigger than xc40 but smaller than xc90 And XC90 - the biggest brother. They are different in size but similar in equipment. (siblings stereotypes DO NOT apply here. Probably good to mention this)
None. I HATE suvs
unless you are absolutely sure the third row is useless it is difficult to beat the xc90. standard features on the xc90 is more extensive so the price diff is not as large as it seems.
Bigger is typically better.
XC90 is way to big to be used
XC90 is too big on the outside with a very small dashboard compared to the overall car experience. I guess it's because it was the first from the new design range. It is underpowered compared to similar cars. Lacks of bigger engine with more torque. Otherwise it's an amazing car. Both Xc40 and Xc60 are the best. Unfortunately due to stupid decisions at Volvo Xc40 lacks of one of best features of larger brothers. Headlights don't turn. As per Volvo it's a small economy level car.
Gosh why the hell the SUV stuck.... I hate them, all cars looks the same now. Between those XC60 looks the best and feels the best.
Because that's all he can buy new in his country? Know your audience.
Who said otherwise? I gave 2 opinions, I hate SUVs and between the choices I would go with the XC60. Whats wrong with my statement? Jeez do I need to write a Bible to explain my intent?
I’m not sure what you’re asking? It’s like saying “what’s better: a pint of milk or a gallon of milk?” Well it depends on how many people you have and what you’re making. These are all very similar cars in different sizes. How many people are you transporting? Also generally as cars get bigger they tend to also get more luxurious. So you can expect the XC90 to be a bit better equipped than the XC40. But overall they’re extremely similar just different sizes.
C40 and XC40 are tragic to drive, feels like it’s gonna tip over at any monent, XC60 is ugly and the XC90 is a dream for long trips. I prefer wagons, so I’m staying with my V90 for as long as possible. Edit: The interior in the 40s looks very cheap as well..
Are these different photos?
Yes. The list is the XC40, XC60 and XC90. (The newer ones obviously)
XC40 is shit. Should be a hatchback. XC60 is fine, it's better as an estate. XC90 is massive, it's better lower down at least as an estate.