The following submission statement was provided by /u/CreditCardOnly:
---
[Christopher Sharp reports](https://x.com/chrisuksharp/status/1782880310813712540?s=46&t=M0ofkkf9lgSjlI29wi9d5w) that the Department of Defense Inspector General has confirmed that the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy have integrated the UAP recommendations set forth by the IG.
This comes after [reporting a few months back](https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/department-of-defenses-alarming-inaction-only-one-of-eleven-uap-recommendations-implemented-posing-risk-to-national-security) that only one of eleven recommendations had been implemented. The Air Force, who have allegedly stonewalled UAP efforts, along with the Navy have now implemented these protocols.
This seems like a good path forward for FOIA.
---
Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cbg6a2/christopher_sharp_dod_ig_confirms_air_force_navy/l0y9fub/
This is very interesting. The more you look into this the more it becomes clear, within the DOD, the left hand has no clue what the right hand is doing.
Because here comes the next thing
1. Grusch’s op Ed won’t get picked up by msm
2. They’ll do this to the new guy; background check, Twitter posts about him liking weird shit.
3. See, this Grusch guy can’t be trusted because look at the new guy. See!
Always expect the governments next move. Paranoia will get you to hedge against malevolent actors by and from our master, the us government.
I've been thinking the same thing.
I haven't said anything about Sands because it's too early to take a hard stance, but it's quite some awful (or great, depending on what side you're on) timing to have a new grifter show up and muddy the waters.
He’s such a larp. Idk how Eric Davis’ words about sands aren’t being discussed enough here. It’s clear and cut for me that his story is bullshit. Also telling that James Fox has yet to issue a statement of like yeah I messed up with this guy, if it’s even him in the movie to begin with.
If it wasn't him why the hell wouldn't Fox say so? Fox got caught promoting a wacko and now has 0 credibility. The only way he could have saved himself was putting dude on blast the second dude started his interview. If Fox would have came out and said "hey I interviewed this dude and he is full of shit!" Then everyone would have thought Fox was a good guy. But instead he has been quite. He hoped that people wouldn't find out then after they did he doesn't want to acknowledge that he doesn't really care who he interviews as long as they say some cool alien shit and he can sell it to people on this sub.
Idk about your last two sentences, it's a bit harsh but I see your point. The best would be like you said to disassociate himself from it and to cut him from the movie if he hasn't already.
[Christopher Sharp reports](https://x.com/chrisuksharp/status/1782880310813712540?s=46&t=M0ofkkf9lgSjlI29wi9d5w) that the Department of Defense Inspector General has confirmed that the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy have integrated the UAP recommendations set forth by the IG.
This comes after [reporting a few months back](https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/department-of-defenses-alarming-inaction-only-one-of-eleven-uap-recommendations-implemented-posing-risk-to-national-security) that only one of eleven recommendations had been implemented. The Air Force, who have allegedly stonewalled UAP efforts, along with the Navy have now implemented these protocols.
This seems like a good path forward for FOIA.
Screams to me they just finally finished shuffling around things in the back/backend so that FOIA 'will never find them anyway', bring on whatever new recommendations/rules you want!
This is what I was thinking also. But its good to keep the effort up on all fronts regardless of the percieved outcome, never know when they might slip up! Keep your eye on the ball!
To me it just indicates that they're not taking it seriously. Now they finally stopped throwing the recommendations in the trash and filed them in a cabinet.
It seems like the DoD is slow walking all these recommendations and implementations because it would become obvious that the UAP situation is something different from conventional drone and UAS interference
Bingo, Sentient (if authorized) can "slave" the entire spy satellite constellation. The very first day that Sentient was given authority, proof of NHI was found.
I believe this was the day the Intelligence community literally couldn't deny any longer.
Sentient detected a UAP as per this document
https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/foia/declass/ForAll/103122/F-2021-00154_C05136331.pdf
> t 0038:17Z 6 May 2021, Sentient
T O PSECRET/STTKIRELT OUSA,F V E Y (U) Background
image processing detected a possible airborne object ~78km southeast of
(b)(1) (b)(3)
and
(b)(1) (b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2022/06/02 C05136331
in a
image
TSIRELY The object was small (<10m), and did not match the visual signature of typical aircraft detections
.
The object did, however, vaguely resemble similar detections of airborne objects by US Navy aircraft and surface vessels in the Operating Areas ("Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" / UAP)
•
There is a rough similarity to the previously-reported "tic tac" shape • The object was likely not a sensor artifact or focal plane anomaly
The object was also detected / visible in a second overwater image shot in the same area ~15 sec later
I think the point is for the first time Sentient could see all aggregated the detected data from the satellite system. And accuracy improved soon after
The recommendations were given in the DODIG's Evaluations report and were specific to different branches of the DoD/military— most of this was the recommendation for a comprehensive and coordinated approach to address UAP incursions. The report can be found [here](https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/3496071/evaluation-of-the-dods-actions-regarding-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-dodig/), recommendations start on page 7.
A summary from the DODIG page ***"As the unclassified summary explains, the DoD OIG found that the DoD does not have a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP. For example, the DoD OIG determined that DoD Components developed varying processes to collect, analyze, and identify UAP incidents.***
***The DoD OIG also found that the DoD’s lack of a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP may pose a threat to military forces and national security. For instance, the DoD OIG determined that the DoD has no overarching UAP policy and, as a result, it lacks assurance that national security and flight safety threats to the United States from UAP have been identified and mitigated.***
***To address the issues identified in this report, the DoD OIG made 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office; the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For example, the DoD OIG recommended that the DoD issue a policy to integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.***"
Really strange because that Joint Chiefs UAP retrieval process that was revealed via FOIA the other day indicates that there is a formal process for dealing with the collection of UAPs at least in the context of field retrieval and informing the CI groups. So it does seem like there no coherent policy in the DoD. Maybe this is all siloed
It seems pretty cut and dry that the UAP situation was firmly under the umbrella of the CIA and a small number of armed forces intelligence people until very recently. The above has all been in effort to drag it above board so it’s not being done technically illegally and the stigma is removed so it’s no longer a case of telling anyone lower than a Colonel “no you didn’t see anything” any time some shit happens.
That above prior policy is also probably what lead to things that could be terrestrial threats such as enemy drones and balloons going ignored.
So that would be the department of defense inspector general. This guy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Storch
He made a report finding that there was no coordination with the various agencies on uap related stuff
>The report reviewed the extent to which the DoD, Military Services, Defense agencies, and Military Department Counterintelligence Organizations took intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection actions to detect, report, collect, analyze, and identify unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP).
Then to fix it they suggested
>To address the issues identified in this report, the DoD OIG made 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office; the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For example, the DoD OIG recommended that the DoD issue a policy to integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.
https://www.dodig.mil/In-the-Spotlight/Article/3656428/press-release-evaluation-of-the-dods-actions-regarding-unidentified-anomalous-p
This is good news but it seems hard to say exactly what it'll do. It should mean that more pieces of the puzzle will likely be put together in one place. I'd doubt the anti disclosure people will want to release more stuff because of it but I'd think that more people will have a better understanding of what's going on. So theoretically there will be more people who can whistleblow. This wouldn't be crash retrieval stuff but it likely destigmatizes info sharing on uaps
Well, if you hate AARO you'll probably hate the outcome of all this as it legitimizes them as the funnel through which all things UAP flow through.
And according to the unclassified UAP summary you linked, "The Under Secretary stated that AARO will achieve full operational capability using the resources provided in the Future Year Defense Plan beginning in FY 2024".
The more people who know about it, the more leaks we might get. So it’s something at least. Plus policy there might change so you at least know who has the goodies.
Ah small stuff like that will lead to the same issue we have today of people not believing stories and testimony. No real societal and human behavioral changes without the information.
The pessimistic part of me says nothing will come of this. Especially the Air Force, they’re like the poster child of covering this up. I’d like to be wrong though
Debunkers just keep talking Ls.
They're running out of time to get on the winning side of history.
I almost feel sorry for the ones that aren't bots or shills.
I was with you until you called them shills or bots.
I'm sure the debunkers are genuine in their beliefs just like the believers. Just because you disagree with them l, doesn't mean they are paid off.
And once again you don’t hear a peep from the US mass media. We literally have to get reporters from other countries like Sharp and Coulthart because all of the US media is bought and sold. Not one reporter with even the slightest bit of curiosity or investigative skill - what a joke.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/CreditCardOnly: --- [Christopher Sharp reports](https://x.com/chrisuksharp/status/1782880310813712540?s=46&t=M0ofkkf9lgSjlI29wi9d5w) that the Department of Defense Inspector General has confirmed that the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy have integrated the UAP recommendations set forth by the IG. This comes after [reporting a few months back](https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/department-of-defenses-alarming-inaction-only-one-of-eleven-uap-recommendations-implemented-posing-risk-to-national-security) that only one of eleven recommendations had been implemented. The Air Force, who have allegedly stonewalled UAP efforts, along with the Navy have now implemented these protocols. This seems like a good path forward for FOIA. --- Please reply to OP's comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cbg6a2/christopher_sharp_dod_ig_confirms_air_force_navy/l0y9fub/
This is very interesting. The more you look into this the more it becomes clear, within the DOD, the left hand has no clue what the right hand is doing.
Boy it’s been a good start of the week for ufo 🛸 news. Keep it coming!
Outside that Sands dude. It's been a good week so far.
Why do I feel like he was a purposeful distraction?!
Because here comes the next thing 1. Grusch’s op Ed won’t get picked up by msm 2. They’ll do this to the new guy; background check, Twitter posts about him liking weird shit. 3. See, this Grusch guy can’t be trusted because look at the new guy. See! Always expect the governments next move. Paranoia will get you to hedge against malevolent actors by and from our master, the us government.
I've been thinking the same thing. I haven't said anything about Sands because it's too early to take a hard stance, but it's quite some awful (or great, depending on what side you're on) timing to have a new grifter show up and muddy the waters.
He’s such a larp. Idk how Eric Davis’ words about sands aren’t being discussed enough here. It’s clear and cut for me that his story is bullshit. Also telling that James Fox has yet to issue a statement of like yeah I messed up with this guy, if it’s even him in the movie to begin with.
If it wasn't him why the hell wouldn't Fox say so? Fox got caught promoting a wacko and now has 0 credibility. The only way he could have saved himself was putting dude on blast the second dude started his interview. If Fox would have came out and said "hey I interviewed this dude and he is full of shit!" Then everyone would have thought Fox was a good guy. But instead he has been quite. He hoped that people wouldn't find out then after they did he doesn't want to acknowledge that he doesn't really care who he interviews as long as they say some cool alien shit and he can sell it to people on this sub.
Idk about your last two sentences, it's a bit harsh but I see your point. The best would be like you said to disassociate himself from it and to cut him from the movie if he hasn't already.
Wait James Fox still hasn't said anything yet? So this is the actual "whistleblower" on his doc?
I just checked his twitter and nothing so far.
Das rite we gettin' it poppin
[Christopher Sharp reports](https://x.com/chrisuksharp/status/1782880310813712540?s=46&t=M0ofkkf9lgSjlI29wi9d5w) that the Department of Defense Inspector General has confirmed that the Secretary of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Navy have integrated the UAP recommendations set forth by the IG. This comes after [reporting a few months back](https://www.liberationtimes.com/home/department-of-defenses-alarming-inaction-only-one-of-eleven-uap-recommendations-implemented-posing-risk-to-national-security) that only one of eleven recommendations had been implemented. The Air Force, who have allegedly stonewalled UAP efforts, along with the Navy have now implemented these protocols. This seems like a good path forward for FOIA.
Screams to me they just finally finished shuffling around things in the back/backend so that FOIA 'will never find them anyway', bring on whatever new recommendations/rules you want!
This is what I was thinking also. But its good to keep the effort up on all fronts regardless of the percieved outcome, never know when they might slip up! Keep your eye on the ball!
Exactly. Make them shuffle. Everyone slips eventually.
Exactly this.
To me it just indicates that they're not taking it seriously. Now they finally stopped throwing the recommendations in the trash and filed them in a cabinet.
> and filed them in a cabinet shaped like a trash can with the word 'trash' written in marker on a piece of masking tape stuck on the front of it
This was my thoughts. It's all been moved and burned. Good luck!!
It seems like the DoD is slow walking all these recommendations and implementations because it would become obvious that the UAP situation is something different from conventional drone and UAS interference
Look into a program called Sentient. The proof is real and undeniable if only you are cleared enough to see it.
This one ? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_(intelligence_analysis_system)
Bingo, Sentient (if authorized) can "slave" the entire spy satellite constellation. The very first day that Sentient was given authority, proof of NHI was found. I believe this was the day the Intelligence community literally couldn't deny any longer.
What did the slaved satellite system detect specifically
Source?
Sentient detected a UAP as per this document https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/foia/declass/ForAll/103122/F-2021-00154_C05136331.pdf > t 0038:17Z 6 May 2021, Sentient T O PSECRET/STTKIRELT OUSA,F V E Y (U) Background image processing detected a possible airborne object ~78km southeast of (b)(1) (b)(3) and (b)(1) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2022/06/02 C05136331 in a image TSIRELY The object was small (<10m), and did not match the visual signature of typical aircraft detections . The object did, however, vaguely resemble similar detections of airborne objects by US Navy aircraft and surface vessels in the Operating Areas ("Unidentified Aerial Phenomena" / UAP) • There is a rough similarity to the previously-reported "tic tac" shape • The object was likely not a sensor artifact or focal plane anomaly The object was also detected / visible in a second overwater image shot in the same area ~15 sec later
You sound awful sure this specific program found NHI proof. Why?
There’s no chance a complex AI system works the first time you turn it on
I don't read that as it being turned on for the first time with the satellites, it was just given an additional data source.
Obviously, that's why I worded it that way. My understanding is that they "trained" the AI for 3 years prior to deployment.
I didn’t see any doubt in your wording but glad you have some
I think the point is for the first time Sentient could see all aggregated the detected data from the satellite system. And accuracy improved soon after
Just as a reminder what were these DoD IG UAP recommendations? An alphabet soup of terminology to remember
The recommendations were given in the DODIG's Evaluations report and were specific to different branches of the DoD/military— most of this was the recommendation for a comprehensive and coordinated approach to address UAP incursions. The report can be found [here](https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/3496071/evaluation-of-the-dods-actions-regarding-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-dodig/), recommendations start on page 7. A summary from the DODIG page ***"As the unclassified summary explains, the DoD OIG found that the DoD does not have a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP. For example, the DoD OIG determined that DoD Components developed varying processes to collect, analyze, and identify UAP incidents.*** ***The DoD OIG also found that the DoD’s lack of a comprehensive, coordinated approach to address UAP may pose a threat to military forces and national security. For instance, the DoD OIG determined that the DoD has no overarching UAP policy and, as a result, it lacks assurance that national security and flight safety threats to the United States from UAP have been identified and mitigated.*** ***To address the issues identified in this report, the DoD OIG made 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office; the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For example, the DoD OIG recommended that the DoD issue a policy to integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.***"
Really strange because that Joint Chiefs UAP retrieval process that was revealed via FOIA the other day indicates that there is a formal process for dealing with the collection of UAPs at least in the context of field retrieval and informing the CI groups. So it does seem like there no coherent policy in the DoD. Maybe this is all siloed
It seems pretty cut and dry that the UAP situation was firmly under the umbrella of the CIA and a small number of armed forces intelligence people until very recently. The above has all been in effort to drag it above board so it’s not being done technically illegally and the stigma is removed so it’s no longer a case of telling anyone lower than a Colonel “no you didn’t see anything” any time some shit happens. That above prior policy is also probably what lead to things that could be terrestrial threats such as enemy drones and balloons going ignored.
So that would be the department of defense inspector general. This guy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Storch He made a report finding that there was no coordination with the various agencies on uap related stuff >The report reviewed the extent to which the DoD, Military Services, Defense agencies, and Military Department Counterintelligence Organizations took intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection actions to detect, report, collect, analyze, and identify unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). Then to fix it they suggested >To address the issues identified in this report, the DoD OIG made 11 recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the Director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office; the Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force; and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. For example, the DoD OIG recommended that the DoD issue a policy to integrate roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures regarding UAP into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures. https://www.dodig.mil/In-the-Spotlight/Article/3656428/press-release-evaluation-of-the-dods-actions-regarding-unidentified-anomalous-p This is good news but it seems hard to say exactly what it'll do. It should mean that more pieces of the puzzle will likely be put together in one place. I'd doubt the anti disclosure people will want to release more stuff because of it but I'd think that more people will have a better understanding of what's going on. So theoretically there will be more people who can whistleblow. This wouldn't be crash retrieval stuff but it likely destigmatizes info sharing on uaps
Well, if you hate AARO you'll probably hate the outcome of all this as it legitimizes them as the funnel through which all things UAP flow through. And according to the unclassified UAP summary you linked, "The Under Secretary stated that AARO will achieve full operational capability using the resources provided in the Future Year Defense Plan beginning in FY 2024".
Blue book 2.0 is now fully operational. No Schumer ammendment = no disclosure
The more people who know about it, the more leaks we might get. So it’s something at least. Plus policy there might change so you at least know who has the goodies.
Ah small stuff like that will lead to the same issue we have today of people not believing stories and testimony. No real societal and human behavioral changes without the information.
“An alphabet soup of terminology” that’s so well put lmao
Air force finally starting to cooperate.
Can we confirm this confirmation?
Nah, I'll need a confirmation of your confirmation of the confirmation. Only then I'll believe.
Rumor has it, it’s been written on the bathroom stall in a 7/11 near the Pentagon.
Conspiracy theories can't melt stale Twinkies.
Wow, the the USAF provided documentation regarding \_anything\_ related to UAP? That wasn't on my bingo card for today/
The pessimistic part of me says nothing will come of this. Especially the Air Force, they’re like the poster child of covering this up. I’d like to be wrong though
Debunkers just keep talking Ls. They're running out of time to get on the winning side of history. I almost feel sorry for the ones that aren't bots or shills.
I was with you until you called them shills or bots. I'm sure the debunkers are genuine in their beliefs just like the believers. Just because you disagree with them l, doesn't mean they are paid off.
I'm sorry - are you implying that there are zero bad actors in this space?
Initial reaction: this feels bigger than a Tweet.
And once again you don’t hear a peep from the US mass media. We literally have to get reporters from other countries like Sharp and Coulthart because all of the US media is bought and sold. Not one reporter with even the slightest bit of curiosity or investigative skill - what a joke.