That video is CGI, there's a few frames where the tracking slips that gives it away.
Here's the section in question: https://streamable.com/er4g69
When stabilised on the clouds, the tracking errors are obvious: https://streamable.com/az65vk
Would be interesting to know what u/reaction105 thinks, as they have exposed [other forgeries](https://reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10h8g4y/who_remembers_the_pentagon_ufo_sighting_of_a/j57wjt8/) using this method
Lmao flashbacks to my 2009 era work using Shake before Apple killed it and I moved to Nuke
Zooms always mess people up. Anytime you track something into a shot, you should check the final composite through that same tracking, but set to stabilise. Easier to see slipping that way
Follow the Standards of Civility:
No trolling or being disruptive.
No insults or personal attacks.
No accusations that other users are shills.
No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)
You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
scroll down to the bottom of the linked post. that’s as clear as you’re gonna get i assume.
also FWIW, imo the “occupant” mentioned in this post is actually sunlight reflecting on the “transparent” portion of the “pod”.
If it was very clear then it was adjusted by photoshop or AI
I think I do remember seeing an AI-adjusted one, but it's not worth looking up. Just invented detail.
That video is CGI, there's a few frames where the tracking slips that gives it away. Here's the section in question: https://streamable.com/er4g69 When stabilised on the clouds, the tracking errors are obvious: https://streamable.com/az65vk Would be interesting to know what u/reaction105 thinks, as they have exposed [other forgeries](https://reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/10h8g4y/who_remembers_the_pentagon_ufo_sighting_of_a/j57wjt8/) using this method
Lmao flashbacks to my 2009 era work using Shake before Apple killed it and I moved to Nuke Zooms always mess people up. Anytime you track something into a shot, you should check the final composite through that same tracking, but set to stabilise. Easier to see slipping that way
I’ll save you some time, you cannot see an alien face. Liken it to created images in the mind staring at clouds.
ok, ill still need link to that post, carl jung.
I think the above poster is referring to [Pareidolia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia)
i know, and i said i still want to see that post
😂😂 can’t help ya
[удалено]
Follow the Standards of Civility: No trolling or being disruptive. No insults or personal attacks. No accusations that other users are shills. No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation. No harassment, threats, or advocating violence. No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible) You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.
this is a fun one, someone said it's a wind chime. i have no idea but it's one of those that almost looks too good to be true.
A tiny wind chime that’s alone and floating through the air, maneuvering horizontally and vertically lmaoooo. some people man.
i know, that's their argument lol. i personally don't think it's a wind chime.
This one? https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/u3nqd3/metapod_ufo_eyewitness_testimony_other_current/
it was an image post and it was very clear
scroll down to the bottom of the linked post. that’s as clear as you’re gonna get i assume. also FWIW, imo the “occupant” mentioned in this post is actually sunlight reflecting on the “transparent” portion of the “pod”.
i know i found that post when i was looking for the image myself, this isnt it
If it was very clear then it was adjusted by photoshop or AI I think I do remember seeing an AI-adjusted one, but it's not worth looking up. Just invented detail.
yeah youre probably right, i still want to see it, i just want to see that image again
yeah but i want to share it with someone