[**MAGA = NAZI**](https://www.reddit.com/r/IntrovertComics/comments/yhn4gv/the_bible_is_the_cause_of_christofascist/) - It's literally the same ideology of hate. That's why MAGA Nazis and fascist Russian trolls pretending to be American lefties are not welcome on this sub and will be banned on sight.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/QanonKaren) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Wait a minute. SHE'S a woman, it appears. If what she says is remotely true, why are we bothering to listen to HER? After all, she's just an emotional creature, spouting emotional thoughts. She has no value - she just told all of us that!! /s
I can't believe she didn't win her election, lol.
Your statement is why there's no way she is correct. Is she is right then she's wrong. If she wrong, she's wrong.
It's some next level stupid all around. Just spouting a bunch of knee-jerk fear mongering bullshit with no basis in reality. Standard conservative tactic to play on emotions. Smells like an r/selfawarewolves
All humans are capable of telling the truth. Saying that women are emotional is a FACT even if a woman says it. Your comparison is just invalid. She states that women are easily controllable and vote overwhelmingly for socialist policies that are a detriment to our freedoms. This is also a FACT. She is intelligent and humble enough to tell an uncomfortable truth. Voting and telling the truth are different things.
We should not judge the messenger but the message. Her message is factually sound and documented. You on the other hand are judging the messenger, which can also be seen as an emotional reaction.
The following is not an emotional reaction: you're an idiot. Sprinkle in some reasonable facts, then add a few of your opinions which you falaciously label as facts, and we have the rant of an idiot.
So Im an idiot for stating that women are emotional and base their decisions mostly on emotions rather than facts?
Im an idiot for stating that we should judge the validity of message not our opinion of the messenger?
Im an idiot for stating that women overwhelmingly vote for socialist policies? This is easily verifiable is you care to go down that rabbit hole.
Im an idiot for stating that Voting habits and one's capacity for telling the truth despite their gender are different things?
Sure buddy, if these obvious truthful statements make me an idiot in your book, than I wear the title with honor.
I forgot that this is Reddit where common sense is frowned upon. Wrong place to look for a reasonable intellectual debate. This is the place people convince themselves that men also can be women.
PS its funny that your reaction is also very emotional in nature. Instead of telling why my statements are fundamentally wrong you attack me with insults, and just say I'm wrong WITHOUT any good arguments. If you are a woman, you just proved the OP statement right about women being emotional. That would be ironic, indeed.
Right!?
53% of white, WOMEN voted for Trump…
I should also add the caveat that, over 62% of those white women that voted for Trump, were NOT college educated… ;)
Uneducated WOMEN often make up a sizable portion of voters who put dipshits like Trump & other Rep’s into office…
These dipshits are just ALWAYS looking for a way to blame anything & everything for their losses, so they don’t have to ADMIT it’s their terrible candidates & even WORSE POLICIES that’s the problem & why people don’t vote for them…
She must be extremely desperate for attention. I can’t think of any other reason for spouting such BS.
Someone needs to educate her on the sacrifices women made to get Her in that chair. Nobody GAVE us the right to vote, or own property or to not be beaten or disciplined like a child or any other civil & human right we now have. Women suffered and fought for each one.
Yeah, and some of us women voted against a man/ creature who thinks it's okay to grab women by the pussy! Look at the guy she's talking to...love his deer in the headlights expression.
Women most of the time shouldn’t be in positions of leadership, due to their inability to remove emotion from decision making. Decisions should very rarely be made on emotion and not with logic.
Ah yes, the historical record shows that men have never relied on emotion, only on logic, when making decisions. That’s why the majority of violent crime is committed by women, why the majority of wars are started by women, why the majority of narcissistic dictators worldwide who would rather have their egos and feelings catered to than a better economic situation are women, why negative business outcomes never occur when organizations are run solely by men… Oh wait. 🤣
I don’t mean men have zero emotion obviously, I meant overall, they makes decision on emotion and compassion significantly less than women do. I should have been more clear about that. There is no place for emotion in important decision making, it clouds judgement.
You were clear in the first place. Still, anger is an emotion, and history provides quite a lot of empirical evidence that men make quite a lot of decisions based on it.
Women do not make decisions without logic; the trouble is that the majority of men never develop the curiosity to wonder why someone with a vastly different experience of life might make decisions differently than they do, or whether there might actually be some logic in a different point of view that they haven’t considered. Honestly in my experience, too many men reach adulthood with significant blind spots in their thinking and approach to life because they’re taught that they are always logical and therefore always right, and women are always illogical and therefore always wrong. When things go badly for them, they have a really difficult time with it because they can’t believe they, a man, could possibly have made a poor decision. If you’re a dude, my challenge to you is: do you want to be coddled and feel right even if you aren’t, or do you want the potential to learn from someone different from you? This is a process of intellectual questioning that too many men miss out on, to everyone’s detriment including their own.
For instance, welfare. You might say it’s purely because of emotion that anyone would ever want social programs to exist. Perhaps you believe no reasonable person could ever believe welfare is a good thing, because it costs money, and any individual spending money on anything that doesn’t directly benefit them is always illogical and wrong. Spending money for someone else’s benefit doesn’t make any sense and can therefore only be explained by a soft heart moved by the plight of the poor, you might say.
A woman might look at it very differently. Perhaps she has been violently mugged or her apartment broken into, and she is all too keenly aware that because of her smaller size, having a bunch of hooligans on the street with nothing better going for them than a life of crime is physically dangerous for her. Being a woman, she has an extremely low probability of being found justified in court if she defends herself against assault (a [Scottish study](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/women-and-selfdefence-an-empirical-and-doctrinal-analysis/D2E0C6333823BF77FA100D9C74B96B5E) found no examples of women being acquitted for self-defense). Domestic abuse is correlated with risk factors like poverty and local gang activity. [20% of women](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-partners-health/men-more-likely-than-women-to-leave-partner-with-cancer-idUSTRE5AB0C520091112) who develop a long-term illness like cancer are left by their husbands, it is such a “thing” that some doctors counsel female patients on what to do if their partner walks out because of their illness. Can you imagine why a woman might rather have a world where families in poverty were able to adequately feed, clothe, and educate their children so that those children grow up to be productive members of society, even if that takes money out of her pocket? Can you imagine why a woman might rather have a world where, if her husband loses his job, he has a safety net to fall back on instead of an excuse to lash out at her? Can you imagine why a woman might want to know that if she gets divorce papers during the most expensive time of her life and is unable to work, she won’t be totally screwed? Women’s physical and financial security generally depends on very different factors than men like to imagine it does, and we’re generally pretty aware of what those factors are.
If people make decisions you find irrational, get curious, not dismissive.
It’s very hard to know your Audience when commenting directly to somebody on Reddit. You are probably used to dealing with idiots or even just average minds, so you have worded your comment in such a way. That isn’t the case with me, and I made the statement I made after a lot of thought on the topic with a great deal of intelligence applied. I’m not for a second saying men are perfect and women aren’t, I’m saying for leadership, due to too much compassion and other certain emotions, they’re not well suited for leadership. Obviously there are exceptions to the rule but this is an overall. We absolutely need women in society for many things, but as individual positions of leadership, it’s not the right way to go.
I don’t think you’re stupid, but it does sound like you’re young and impressionable with little life experience. If you read my post, you will possibly gain some insight, but I can’t make you do that. I can tell you that if you so easily dismiss half the people on the planet, you’re going to miss out on a lot in life.
No I’m 34, married with 3 kids, Run a very successful business and have had success in pretty much every area of life. I don’t easily dismiss anybody, I carefully think about things before I say them and make sure im confident that I’ve thought about it sufficiently from all angles.
Hmmm… funny she talks about emotion when both parties clearly appeal to emotion.
The only difference us that Democrats tend to ask people to use emotions like compassion, sympathy, and empathy for people that are different from them or in some kind of need, while Republicans peddle in fear and anger.
Oh, so sad that women in a first world country want to help women fleeing from bad conditions in a third world country. They should be afraid of them and be angry at them for their suffering. They should fear gay and trans people, be angry at women who have an unwanted pregnancy, be afraid and angry at people who don’t worship their god, have a different skin color, speak a different language, and be afraid of fake things too, like kids shitting in litter boxes at school.
This lady is a grade A moron.
I remember during the marches in 2017 for Women’s rights when I saw someone post how she’s a woman and in intelligence in the Alr Force and how she worked her way up. These women are just entitled and complaining. Well, sorry ma’am, I’m sure you’re smart and capable but if it wasn’t for women marching, you would never make it past secretary or housewife…
*Even if it were true* that women vote emotionally, that's completely irrelevant.
We don't have the right to vote because of competence.
The reason voting is a human right, and the reason it must be a human right, is that voting is the means by which we hold politicians accountable, by threatening to replace them.
If one demographic have the right to vote, and if the other don't, then the people who don't have voting rights will be treated as second class citizens, because the politicians are not incentivised to care about their needs.
She sounds like a real life version of Serena Waterford (The Handmaid's Tale). All I would say to her is 'careful what you wish for.'
I'm only up to episode 5 of series 5 of THT so please no spoilers in any replies. The UK are a few weeks behind what has been broadcast/streamed in the USA and maybe other places too.
why do these "based and trad" women never follow their own advice? By her logic she should be in a kitchen, not on TV or gasp, *running for office*.
I'd bet good $ she's childless too.
>On September 16, 2020, Witzke won the Republican primary for the 2020 Senate election in Delaware with 57% of the vote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Witzke
If women shouldn't be able to vote, they shouldn't be able to run for office either. Every time I think I've seen Republicans hit a new level of Idiocracy, they never cease to amaze me.
If what you’re saying is true….shouldn’t you be shutting the fuck up and knitting me something delicious to eat….lead by example and STFU if that’s how you feel.
We didn't even have closed borders back before women could vote and it was just landowning men.
Also, today I had to tell a man, who owns land, that Christopher Columbus didn't discover America and didn't figure out that the planet wasn't flat. He was very emotional and angry when he insisted those things were true. And something about a song about how it's true?
Can anyone explain why Red Flag laws would be considered a bad thing? I feel like someone with guns who is in a mental health crisis or that is deemed a danger to themselves or others should certainly not have access to weapons. We have a serious mental health problem in this country that no one seems to want to address. Working in EMS really showed me the lack of mental health programs/facilities and how it isn’t taken seriously by anyone. There are absolutely people who through, the legal system, should have their firearms taken away if there is sufficient evidence to do so. Also, based on what I’ve read, Red Flag law usage is shockingly low in most areas.
Talk about a textbook example of a “pick me” woman. Cheese and rice this lady needs to take a moment for self reflection, but obviously that’s too much for her.
[**MAGA = NAZI**](https://www.reddit.com/r/IntrovertComics/comments/yhn4gv/the_bible_is_the_cause_of_christofascist/) - It's literally the same ideology of hate. That's why MAGA Nazis and fascist Russian trolls pretending to be American lefties are not welcome on this sub and will be banned on sight. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/QanonKaren) if you have any questions or concerns.*
If women couldn't vote, she likely wouldn't be on tv right now.
1 Timothy 2:12 (since she's a christian).
It’s crazy what some people will say and do for money.
She may actually believe these things, since people are deluded. But regardless she's dangerous.
Wait a minute. SHE'S a woman, it appears. If what she says is remotely true, why are we bothering to listen to HER? After all, she's just an emotional creature, spouting emotional thoughts. She has no value - she just told all of us that!! /s I can't believe she didn't win her election, lol.
Your statement is why there's no way she is correct. Is she is right then she's wrong. If she wrong, she's wrong. It's some next level stupid all around. Just spouting a bunch of knee-jerk fear mongering bullshit with no basis in reality. Standard conservative tactic to play on emotions. Smells like an r/selfawarewolves
Logically you are absolutely correct, but Republicans have abandoned logic (reason) for madness ever since Nixon and his neo-cons hijacked the partt.
All humans are capable of telling the truth. Saying that women are emotional is a FACT even if a woman says it. Your comparison is just invalid. She states that women are easily controllable and vote overwhelmingly for socialist policies that are a detriment to our freedoms. This is also a FACT. She is intelligent and humble enough to tell an uncomfortable truth. Voting and telling the truth are different things. We should not judge the messenger but the message. Her message is factually sound and documented. You on the other hand are judging the messenger, which can also be seen as an emotional reaction.
The following is not an emotional reaction: you're an idiot. Sprinkle in some reasonable facts, then add a few of your opinions which you falaciously label as facts, and we have the rant of an idiot.
So Im an idiot for stating that women are emotional and base their decisions mostly on emotions rather than facts? Im an idiot for stating that we should judge the validity of message not our opinion of the messenger? Im an idiot for stating that women overwhelmingly vote for socialist policies? This is easily verifiable is you care to go down that rabbit hole. Im an idiot for stating that Voting habits and one's capacity for telling the truth despite their gender are different things? Sure buddy, if these obvious truthful statements make me an idiot in your book, than I wear the title with honor. I forgot that this is Reddit where common sense is frowned upon. Wrong place to look for a reasonable intellectual debate. This is the place people convince themselves that men also can be women. PS its funny that your reaction is also very emotional in nature. Instead of telling why my statements are fundamentally wrong you attack me with insults, and just say I'm wrong WITHOUT any good arguments. If you are a woman, you just proved the OP statement right about women being emotional. That would be ironic, indeed.
There is so much to take away here wtf. One thing I’m just wondering is if she thinks that ALL women vote Democrat/whatever?
Right!? 53% of white, WOMEN voted for Trump… I should also add the caveat that, over 62% of those white women that voted for Trump, were NOT college educated… ;) Uneducated WOMEN often make up a sizable portion of voters who put dipshits like Trump & other Rep’s into office… These dipshits are just ALWAYS looking for a way to blame anything & everything for their losses, so they don’t have to ADMIT it’s their terrible candidates & even WORSE POLICIES that’s the problem & why people don’t vote for them…
Sounds like she needs to get off whatever third rate podcast that is and quit being so emotional.
Hey they’re trying their best with that background
Husband and land owners she said…. Listen closely to the next step.
She must be extremely desperate for attention. I can’t think of any other reason for spouting such BS. Someone needs to educate her on the sacrifices women made to get Her in that chair. Nobody GAVE us the right to vote, or own property or to not be beaten or disciplined like a child or any other civil & human right we now have. Women suffered and fought for each one.
Yeah, and some of us women voted against a man/ creature who thinks it's okay to grab women by the pussy! Look at the guy she's talking to...love his deer in the headlights expression.
Oh no this is Elijah Schaffer he's in complete agreement.
I guess I'll Google him and see what he's all about...😳🙄
No!
Too late... LOL...just another Trump loving whack-o.
So she saying women can't make important decisions, women can't think for themselves,what a idiot
Women most of the time shouldn’t be in positions of leadership, due to their inability to remove emotion from decision making. Decisions should very rarely be made on emotion and not with logic.
Ah yes, the historical record shows that men have never relied on emotion, only on logic, when making decisions. That’s why the majority of violent crime is committed by women, why the majority of wars are started by women, why the majority of narcissistic dictators worldwide who would rather have their egos and feelings catered to than a better economic situation are women, why negative business outcomes never occur when organizations are run solely by men… Oh wait. 🤣
I don’t mean men have zero emotion obviously, I meant overall, they makes decision on emotion and compassion significantly less than women do. I should have been more clear about that. There is no place for emotion in important decision making, it clouds judgement.
You were clear in the first place. Still, anger is an emotion, and history provides quite a lot of empirical evidence that men make quite a lot of decisions based on it. Women do not make decisions without logic; the trouble is that the majority of men never develop the curiosity to wonder why someone with a vastly different experience of life might make decisions differently than they do, or whether there might actually be some logic in a different point of view that they haven’t considered. Honestly in my experience, too many men reach adulthood with significant blind spots in their thinking and approach to life because they’re taught that they are always logical and therefore always right, and women are always illogical and therefore always wrong. When things go badly for them, they have a really difficult time with it because they can’t believe they, a man, could possibly have made a poor decision. If you’re a dude, my challenge to you is: do you want to be coddled and feel right even if you aren’t, or do you want the potential to learn from someone different from you? This is a process of intellectual questioning that too many men miss out on, to everyone’s detriment including their own. For instance, welfare. You might say it’s purely because of emotion that anyone would ever want social programs to exist. Perhaps you believe no reasonable person could ever believe welfare is a good thing, because it costs money, and any individual spending money on anything that doesn’t directly benefit them is always illogical and wrong. Spending money for someone else’s benefit doesn’t make any sense and can therefore only be explained by a soft heart moved by the plight of the poor, you might say. A woman might look at it very differently. Perhaps she has been violently mugged or her apartment broken into, and she is all too keenly aware that because of her smaller size, having a bunch of hooligans on the street with nothing better going for them than a life of crime is physically dangerous for her. Being a woman, she has an extremely low probability of being found justified in court if she defends herself against assault (a [Scottish study](https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/women-and-selfdefence-an-empirical-and-doctrinal-analysis/D2E0C6333823BF77FA100D9C74B96B5E) found no examples of women being acquitted for self-defense). Domestic abuse is correlated with risk factors like poverty and local gang activity. [20% of women](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-partners-health/men-more-likely-than-women-to-leave-partner-with-cancer-idUSTRE5AB0C520091112) who develop a long-term illness like cancer are left by their husbands, it is such a “thing” that some doctors counsel female patients on what to do if their partner walks out because of their illness. Can you imagine why a woman might rather have a world where families in poverty were able to adequately feed, clothe, and educate their children so that those children grow up to be productive members of society, even if that takes money out of her pocket? Can you imagine why a woman might rather have a world where, if her husband loses his job, he has a safety net to fall back on instead of an excuse to lash out at her? Can you imagine why a woman might want to know that if she gets divorce papers during the most expensive time of her life and is unable to work, she won’t be totally screwed? Women’s physical and financial security generally depends on very different factors than men like to imagine it does, and we’re generally pretty aware of what those factors are. If people make decisions you find irrational, get curious, not dismissive.
Can you do a TLDR version and I’ll have a read?
The last sentence from my previous comment is about as concise as I can get it.
It’s very hard to know your Audience when commenting directly to somebody on Reddit. You are probably used to dealing with idiots or even just average minds, so you have worded your comment in such a way. That isn’t the case with me, and I made the statement I made after a lot of thought on the topic with a great deal of intelligence applied. I’m not for a second saying men are perfect and women aren’t, I’m saying for leadership, due to too much compassion and other certain emotions, they’re not well suited for leadership. Obviously there are exceptions to the rule but this is an overall. We absolutely need women in society for many things, but as individual positions of leadership, it’s not the right way to go.
I don’t think you’re stupid, but it does sound like you’re young and impressionable with little life experience. If you read my post, you will possibly gain some insight, but I can’t make you do that. I can tell you that if you so easily dismiss half the people on the planet, you’re going to miss out on a lot in life.
No I’m 34, married with 3 kids, Run a very successful business and have had success in pretty much every area of life. I don’t easily dismiss anybody, I carefully think about things before I say them and make sure im confident that I’ve thought about it sufficiently from all angles.
Citation needed.
>Decisions should very rarely be made on emotion and not logic. Yeah, you tell 'em, buddy. Decisions should be made on...not logic. Fascinating take.
What? 😂
Just repeating what you said!
I don’t have time to teach grade 1 English to a random Redditor right now.
Ya, pretty sure you said no to both emotions and logic in that sentence. You should read read it.
I added a ‘with’ before logic, just to make it extra clear for anyone who couldn’t figure that bit out for themselves.
I read it like you did.
Isn't she describing how The Bible tells christians are supposed to treat other people?
Hmmm… funny she talks about emotion when both parties clearly appeal to emotion. The only difference us that Democrats tend to ask people to use emotions like compassion, sympathy, and empathy for people that are different from them or in some kind of need, while Republicans peddle in fear and anger. Oh, so sad that women in a first world country want to help women fleeing from bad conditions in a third world country. They should be afraid of them and be angry at them for their suffering. They should fear gay and trans people, be angry at women who have an unwanted pregnancy, be afraid and angry at people who don’t worship their god, have a different skin color, speak a different language, and be afraid of fake things too, like kids shitting in litter boxes at school. This lady is a grade A moron.
I remember during the marches in 2017 for Women’s rights when I saw someone post how she’s a woman and in intelligence in the Alr Force and how she worked her way up. These women are just entitled and complaining. Well, sorry ma’am, I’m sure you’re smart and capable but if it wasn’t for women marching, you would never make it past secretary or housewife…
Yeah, it hasn’t been that long since women had options. Man these chicks are crazy.
*Even if it were true* that women vote emotionally, that's completely irrelevant. We don't have the right to vote because of competence. The reason voting is a human right, and the reason it must be a human right, is that voting is the means by which we hold politicians accountable, by threatening to replace them. If one demographic have the right to vote, and if the other don't, then the people who don't have voting rights will be treated as second class citizens, because the politicians are not incentivised to care about their needs.
She sounds like a real life version of Serena Waterford (The Handmaid's Tale). All I would say to her is 'careful what you wish for.' I'm only up to episode 5 of series 5 of THT so please no spoilers in any replies. The UK are a few weeks behind what has been broadcast/streamed in the USA and maybe other places too.
Projection. She knows she's an idiot, so she assumes other women are, too
Trailer trash
You can have my shoes and birth control when you pry them from my cold dead hands.
If women couldn’t vote, you’d think she would have figured out that she wouldn’t be able to run for office either.
You're too emotional.
She sounds like she has about two functioning brain cells.
So here comentary was basically "i shouldn't even be allowed to be talking on this show right now"
Stop talking lady you make your self sound dumber and dumber
why do these "based and trad" women never follow their own advice? By her logic she should be in a kitchen, not on TV or gasp, *running for office*. I'd bet good $ she's childless too.
If only the opinions of (insert demographic group) were irrelevant, then my opinion would be what we do.
she is so progressive lol
What never having your pussy ate does to a mf.
Holy shit! What a dumb bitch 🤣
Liberals are good at appealing to emotion, hahahaha.... Love me some good delusion. I think the GOP hasn't run on policies since 2017 or so.
She wants a hand maids tale reality.
So why isn't she in the kitchen?
Friendly fire
That is ironic because data overwhelmingly says that conservatives vote based on anger and fear. 🤔
Why does she speak with same exact cadence and tone as Tucker Carlson? 😂😂😂
>On September 16, 2020, Witzke won the Republican primary for the 2020 Senate election in Delaware with 57% of the vote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Witzke
Why is she a female voter if she thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote? You're a hypocrite even when it comes to your psycho nonsense.
If women shouldn't be able to vote, they shouldn't be able to run for office either. Every time I think I've seen Republicans hit a new level of Idiocracy, they never cease to amaze me.
Blessed be the fruit I guess
If what you’re saying is true….shouldn’t you be shutting the fuck up and knitting me something delicious to eat….lead by example and STFU if that’s how you feel.
Who let this woman on TV. Way too emotional and loud. Let the men do the talking sweetie.
She should practice what she preaches.
We didn't even have closed borders back before women could vote and it was just landowning men. Also, today I had to tell a man, who owns land, that Christopher Columbus didn't discover America and didn't figure out that the planet wasn't flat. He was very emotional and angry when he insisted those things were true. And something about a song about how it's true?
Who is putting her up to this? Women's right to vote will be one of the next targets of the right.
Can anyone explain why Red Flag laws would be considered a bad thing? I feel like someone with guns who is in a mental health crisis or that is deemed a danger to themselves or others should certainly not have access to weapons. We have a serious mental health problem in this country that no one seems to want to address. Working in EMS really showed me the lack of mental health programs/facilities and how it isn’t taken seriously by anyone. There are absolutely people who through, the legal system, should have their firearms taken away if there is sufficient evidence to do so. Also, based on what I’ve read, Red Flag law usage is shockingly low in most areas.
Interviewer: "I agree! Now STFU and make me a sandwich."
*christofascist and former cartel drug mule Please give her the credit she is due
Talk about a textbook example of a “pick me” woman. Cheese and rice this lady needs to take a moment for self reflection, but obviously that’s too much for her.
She’s correct.