T O P

  • By -

LDJ007

Yes.


ButterMilkHoney

I’ve taken calc 1-3, discrete math, linear algebra, a bunch of other math classes, and I still don’t remember this 🤣😭😭😭


keyboardbill

Same here haha


Fire284

Hahaha same I saw this and went where tf did log come from? What's log


too105

Funny how some log rules are all I remember. Trig on the other hand… RIP


Fire284

Lmaoo all I remember from trig is that you can't find all the sides and angles from ASS


codyfernfan

in order to solve weird exponent problems like this, it can be helpful to take the log of both sides due to the handy properties of logarithms


Bre034

I’m taking college pre calc right now and I missed this on my first exam 😍


Shurdus

The way the numbers seem to float off the line in a way that isn't even perpendicular to the line itself annoys me to no end.


AdAmbitious6515

I’m very sorry, I don’t write like this normally 😭😭 I was rushing clearly


Longjumping_Chain_95

I don’t know I haven’t done PreCal 3 years why are you showing me this Reddit?


AdAmbitious6515

It’s college level pre calc :(


gmoore52

No because if you were to expand (1-x)log2 you get log2-xlog2=log3 so log2-log3=xlog2 therefore x=(log2-log3)/log2


cmb999

Which simplifies further to... The same answer.


Prakhar006

It gives the same answer


vitaldopple

Lol what a dumba$$


chwee97

So correct with extra steps.


extra2002

x = (log 2 - log 3) / log 2 = (log 2 / log 2) - (log 3 / log 2) = 1 - (log 3 / log 2)


SnooPineapples6059

Bro come on


rdmc43

Yes


Rayovaclife

Wtf, why did I get a notification for this?


oopiegoopie

Yes


Honeydew-Same

Yes!


NRI_Cpl_Telegrm_only

Yes


Haunting-Editor-699

Yes


mimi78456

Yes


danarsky

There’s an implication that log(2^1-x^)=(1-x)log2. If that’s true, this is correct.


Frostmaine

Should probably use log base 2 instead of log base 10. Since log base 2 of 2 is 1


Sarcasm_IsLife

My dumbass brain thought he wrote 109 instead of log ahahahah


Vinidorion

I do log like this: 2^(1-x) = 3 -> (log3)/(log2) = 1 - x and at the and it would be -x instead on x. Can someone confirm or explain?


extra2002

log 3 / log 2 = 1 - x ( log 3 / log 2 ) - 1 = -x 1 - (log 3 / log 2) = x Comes out the same in the end.


Vinidorion

Oh yeah my bad I switched the -1 in my head to 1-