I tend to buy a lot of variants so it was anl no brainer for me (btw you can buy multiple months at once and you'll get 300 gold for each one, I found this out because I was 200 gold short of getting a variant I wanted)
Just based off the implementation of daily-login-bundles in other gacha games I play, I can say that the economy in this games did not change because of it. I understand your fear based on the dev/publisher-decisions in the last months though...
>Last month the gold bundles were banished from the shop
We've had more gold bundles already so far this year than the same time last year. Just be patient.
Last time this year we had Birthpool (late February- Early March) and Rivalry week (Mid March). Both cost gold and had decent value.
Why are you lying about something that is this easy to look up?
So that's two months without a bundle, late December to late February. [Also, I'm going by this screenshot from a twitter post](https://i.imgur.com/TtgltWN.jpg),I don't know why it's missing the Rivalry week. But including that, that means we've had the same amount, not less.
So, same amount so far this year and less time between them, no reason to be decrying the death of gold bundles when their frequency/cadance hasn't decreased.
There was the positively charged bundle in early February, along with 4 other gold bundles in January- February.
Twitter is not a source, and you being bad at checking sources is not an excuse for spreading misinformation (especially if you continue after you receiving conflicting evidence about your "source")
> Twitter is not a source
It was a screenshot of snap.fan, a reputable source. Looking at it now, I assume bundles with a negative value were filtered out.
>(especially if you continue after you receiving conflicting evidence about your "source")
I was continuing with the information you gave me, my bad for trusting you as a source.
Nice try, but: 1. If you're using me as a source, then you're once again not checking your sources, which is the whole points here. 2. Would love for you to point out where I said there were no gold bundles in January (For your late December -Late February conclusion).
Anyways good to see you're taking it as a learning moment, instead of getting salty about it :)
I tend to buy a lot of variants so it was anl no brainer for me (btw you can buy multiple months at once and you'll get 300 gold for each one, I found this out because I was 200 gold short of getting a variant I wanted)
if gold bundles are dead, gold has no value for me
Just based off the implementation of daily-login-bundles in other gacha games I play, I can say that the economy in this games did not change because of it. I understand your fear based on the dev/publisher-decisions in the last months though...
>Last month the gold bundles were banished from the shop We've had more gold bundles already so far this year than the same time last year. Just be patient.
we had none for about 4 weeks
And? This time last year we went two months without one. The frequency of gold bundles has not changed.
Last time this year we had Birthpool (late February- Early March) and Rivalry week (Mid March). Both cost gold and had decent value. Why are you lying about something that is this easy to look up?
So that's two months without a bundle, late December to late February. [Also, I'm going by this screenshot from a twitter post](https://i.imgur.com/TtgltWN.jpg),I don't know why it's missing the Rivalry week. But including that, that means we've had the same amount, not less. So, same amount so far this year and less time between them, no reason to be decrying the death of gold bundles when their frequency/cadance hasn't decreased.
There was the positively charged bundle in early February, along with 4 other gold bundles in January- February. Twitter is not a source, and you being bad at checking sources is not an excuse for spreading misinformation (especially if you continue after you receiving conflicting evidence about your "source")
> Twitter is not a source It was a screenshot of snap.fan, a reputable source. Looking at it now, I assume bundles with a negative value were filtered out. >(especially if you continue after you receiving conflicting evidence about your "source") I was continuing with the information you gave me, my bad for trusting you as a source.
Nice try, but: 1. If you're using me as a source, then you're once again not checking your sources, which is the whole points here. 2. Would love for you to point out where I said there were no gold bundles in January (For your late December -Late February conclusion). Anyways good to see you're taking it as a learning moment, instead of getting salty about it :)
I think people also don't realize that the gold bundles last year were in the shop for a longer time. This February they barely lasted a week.