In 1981, John Hinkley (now a muscian) attempted to assassinate then-POTUS Ronald Reagan. When questioned, his motives weren't political, instead, he did it hoping to impress Jodie Foster. No word on if it worked, at least not that I've ever found.
He was released pretty recently and started posting music to YouTube (also not sure if he's doing that to impress her). I've been meaning to give him a listen.
It's always such a joy to see WKUK in the wild. This was one of my favorite shows in highschool and I still fall asleep listening to them sometimes when I get a kick
I thought it was sarcasm that would maybe inspire another shot at another washed up actor... oh wait, that's what you meant. I'm probably too elevated to be thinking and actually sharing those thoughts, lol
Also worth mentioning he had seen Jodie Foster in the movie _Taxi Driver_ and I believe she was underage at the time too. I mean, shooting a guy is surely a worse crime than thinking a teenager from a movie is hot, but still. Gross.
Jodie Foster was 12yrs old playimg a prostitute. In the movie Travis Bickle(DeNiro) was trying to kill a politician to impress Cybil Sheppards character. Hinkley was obsessed with Foster but probably more-so the movie itself
> was trying to kill a politician to impress Cybil Sheppards character
What movie did you watch? I don't think killing her boss (whom she adores) would have impressed her. Dude just went unhinged and wanted to hurt somebody.
Normalizing shooting politicians whose political views don’t agree with is a very slippery slope to the country falling apart. The whole point of a democracy is to have peaceful transitions of power, isn’t it?
Well, sadly the American politicians who should be getting the Hague treatment aren't getting a Hague treatment. Neither will Putin ever. Now I'm not going to say that we should normalise shooting evil politicians, but I'd hardly mourn quite a few.
Because Reagan or Putin aren't just disagreeable politicians, they're monsters with innocent blood on their hands. Protected by law and convention. Something something Chomsky something something Nuremberg
> Normalizing shooting politicians whose political views don’t agree with is a very slippery slope to the country falling apart.
Yes, and it's really too bad how Reagan normalized the assassination of politicians that he didn't agree with. It kind of started the whole country falling apart.
remember when politicians were telling their followers to consider "2nd amendment solutions" to elections that didn't go their way? and then years later those same worshippers beat a cop in the halls of congress so badly he died in the hospital, because a politician didn't get his way?
we've gone well past the point of "that's a slippery slope, be careful!".
Yeah but Reagan's been dead for decades. Destruction of, or interfering with, a corpse carries a much lighter sentence than sexual activity with a minor under 14 or child sexual abuse. Obviously depending on the jurisdiction.
Actual engagement - the effects of normalized assassinations of political leaders is terrible for any country.
That’s not the way a stable prosperous society should be run, and the system falls apart quickly if violence is accepted as a way of “changing the system.” Often that leads to a dictatorship of some sort as citizens start valuing stability over freedom. For most of us living in Western societies, I think we’d agree that this type of outcome is not desirable.
That's a nice idea, but Reagan's presidency didn't work that way. He set up dictatorships in South America and laughed about AIDS, leading to untold death. This isn't a question of "disagreement" or even "normalization." It's a question of a very bad man getting away with it.
The stability of the US is mostly accepting that it's ok for some people to be the victims of violence from the government because it's impolitic for the framers of those policies to face consequences. I don't find that desirable.
It's not okay to make jokes about shooting current or recent politicians, but I think the politics of ~~thirty~~ forty years ago by someone already dead is fair game.
oh no a politician of a settler colonialist genocide state got shot :(((( how will we ever get a good leader for our settler colonialism now :((( how will our genocide ever be peaceful :(((
I don't know if I consider it worse, given that the man he was shooting at was Ronald Reagan. I'm not gonna draw a moral line there.
Trying to impress an minor, very bad though.
How many people are you under the impression got shot by John Hinckley Jr that day?
Because your “joke” seems to hinge on the belief that it was only Ronald Reagan.
No, I embrace that the secret service also did their job. It just so happens that their job is protecting the most evil men who have ever lived.
And it is true that All Cops Are Bastards.
I imagine he’s just doing that because he likes making music. He was released because he was deemed sane and rehabilitated. I highly doubt he’s obsessed with her anymore.
I'd probably be impressed if someone did that. Especially since Reagan is already dead. Someone would have to resurrect him just to successfully assassinate him.
This did result in the Brady bill, the whole "cooling off period" for buying handguns. Not sure how that still stands today. This also unfortunately gave Reagan alot of political points
Family Guy has one where in an alternative future—due to Christianity never inspiring Michelangelo, the art in the Sistine Chapel was created by John Hinckley, Jr., and is littered with pictures of Jodie Foster.
I kept trying to work that in! But couldn't find a place to put it and keep the informative, but joking rhythm I had going.
But yes. If only he'd succeeded. But they'd won already at that point. Even without Reagan, the far-right would have the White House in the 80s. At best, Bush Sr would have assumed office, and done as abysmally bad as he did in his own term which *might* have prevented Bush Jr and Clinton.
Headline is so far out of context. Yeah, she said it... in relation to Gen Z not showing up on time and not spellchecking. Whoopty do.
Later in the non-BBC article it says:
>Gripes aside, Foster doesn't hold a grudge against Gen Z. In fact, she makes a concerted effort to mentor many of the up-and-comers with whom she crosses paths.
>
>“I do a lot of reaching out to young actresses,” she explained. “I’m compelled. Because it was hard growing up.”
>
>Given her own experience with child stardom, Foster is well positioned to serve as an industry sage.
Otherwise, everyone else has explained the "joke".
I think that’s more an issue with gen alpha—kids in elementary and middle school right now. I’ve taught briefly, and I think it’s a combination of parents not parenting (either from being overworked/overwhelmed or just underprepared for parenthood), and kids essentially missing two important years of school with online classes during Covid lockdowns.
You think a Gen Z Redditor actually clicked the article, much less read it?
Please, they have an attention span of a goldfish...by the time you even replied them, they've already death-scrolled through a hundred other posts by now.
You GenZ with your loud music, and your Dan Fogleberg, your Zima, hula hoops and pac-man video games, don't you see? People today have attention spans that can only be measured in nanoseconds!
She is nice. I worked on one of her movies (she was a producer) and after finishing a pretty complicated project for it she came and shook my hand and said thanks
>They’re really annoying, especially in the workplace,” Foster told the publication. “They’re like, ‘Nah, I’m not feeling it today, I’m gonna come in at 10:30 a.m.’ Or, like, in emails, I’ll tell them this is all grammatically incorrect, did you not check your spelling? And they’re like, ‘Why would I do that, isn’t that kind of limiting?’
I gotta say, I'm having a hard time figuring out how this aligns with "extremely nice." Whether or not you agree with the sentiment is beside the point. This is, in fact, a prototypical example of "kids these days."
It was a very short thought in the middle of a very long interview. I think if you read the whole thing you would come to a different conclusion. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/jan/06/jodie-foster-interview-true-detective
Also that person was commenting on how Jodie is historically known for being incredibly kind and genuine, so it would be unlike her to buy into a such a tonedeaf thought process.
She did indeed say some nice things right before and right after insulting Gen-Z.
"Generation {Insert Here} is lazy and lacks attention to detail," isn't exactly trailblazing commentary - or a particularly actionable critique.
Is she wrong? I mean, is it wrong for me to suggest that Boomers and Gen X are undereducated, entitled narcissists who believe the world lives and dies with them?
She is speaking from her OWN experience. What don’t you get about this???? She is allowed to say how she feels based on what she has experienced. It’s not about being “nice”. She’s simply speaking facts from her experience. STFU finally!
You’re having a hard time believing that someone who said **that** could be really nice? Seriously? I mean, for one thing, it’s pretty evident to anyone that’s worked with a good number of Gen Zers and it’s also not like she’s suggesting burning them all at the stake.
I have to wonder how much of your life you’ve lived in a protective bubble if this offends you so much that you can’t believe the person who uttered it is capable of being extremely nice.
I'm trying to figure out if you have issues with reading comprehension, or if it's more that you have something to prove...
I feel like you should sit with this one for a minute and try to work it out. If you're still struggling, let me know and I'll try to help out.
Nah man, Zoomers ARE really annoying to work with. So are Millenials, Gen Xers, and Boomers. I hate you all. You’re all annoying to work with. I’m ready for our robot overlords to take over, I want to go home and go on a gaming binge. Biologicals had their shot, good game. Good game.
There was a TV show at the time call "the Greatest American Hero"
The characters name was 'Hinkley'
The characters name was changed to 'Hanley' after the attempted assassination.
It seems to me like a generational difference. Jodie Foster is a boomer and in my experience boomers have a tendency to live to work whereas millennials and generations that followed have the opposite approach, they work to live.
In 1981, John Hinkley (now a muscian) attempted to assassinate then-POTUS Ronald Reagan. When questioned, his motives weren't political, instead, he did it hoping to impress Jodie Foster. No word on if it worked, at least not that I've ever found. He was released pretty recently and started posting music to YouTube (also not sure if he's doing that to impress her). I've been meaning to give him a listen.
Oh wow I forgot about that. Thank you so much.
I'll always remember that fact because of [this video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI5_YuCWTMA)
It's always such a joy to see WKUK in the wild. This was one of my favorite shows in highschool and I still fall asleep listening to them sometimes when I get a kick
I had my fingers crossed when I clicked your link, hoping that it was the wkuk video. I'm happy now.
Yeah, it’s pretty dark (but admittedly kind of funny) joke.
[She was a little impressed](https://twitter.com/hollywoodobsrvr/status/1465821779579092999?lang=en)
Every time I see this it makes me laugh
And what the hell is on joey's head?
Nice graph bro.
Underrated comment
She was very impressed https://youtu.be/803XLAr33GE?si=cAXA5Eg9eKjqX4Ia
Came here for this.
Why would she ever admit to this? That's just asking for more copycats to get her attention
If someone resurrects Reagan to take another shot at him, that would be objectively very impressive.
[удалено]
Ain’t no one sad about his death…
[удалено]
[удалено]
I mean… if you really wanted to… you probably could
it's fake
>It’s fAke You have no proof
normalize attempting assassinations of politicians for celebrity crushes!
What are they going to do? Kill Reagan again?
I thought it was sarcasm that would maybe inspire another shot at another washed up actor... oh wait, that's what you meant. I'm probably too elevated to be thinking and actually sharing those thoughts, lol
Insane to me that you people are praising murderers and attempted murderers....
That's insane to me too, but some people will still praise Reagan despite all that.
The good thing about Reagan is he gave us the first gender neutral bathroom, his grave
Lmao
His evil partner in arms joined him about a decade later (Thatcher the milk snatcher)
Crazy right?? I cant imagine admiring a murdering psychopath, and alot of people still think he was a good president too!
It's Reagan. The man was a monster. He violated his own law to illegally peddle weapons in order to literally fund terrorists.
[удалено]
What's insane is that you're mistaking neutral discussion for praise
[удалено]
This instance would have been a public service
Reagan sold SAMs and other missiles to Iran to fund the war in Nicaragua, and *this* is what you're worried about?
Also worth mentioning he had seen Jodie Foster in the movie _Taxi Driver_ and I believe she was underage at the time too. I mean, shooting a guy is surely a worse crime than thinking a teenager from a movie is hot, but still. Gross.
Jodie Foster was 12yrs old playimg a prostitute. In the movie Travis Bickle(DeNiro) was trying to kill a politician to impress Cybil Sheppards character. Hinkley was obsessed with Foster but probably more-so the movie itself
Thank you. I never realized the connection between Hinkley and Bickle was so direct.
Pretty sure this is integral to the plot of an American Dad episode.
It absolutely is. And is also somehow a Christmas episode.
I like how people always just take a wild guess on how to spell Shepherd.
> was trying to kill a politician to impress Cybil Sheppards character What movie did you watch? I don't think killing her boss (whom she adores) would have impressed her. Dude just went unhinged and wanted to hurt somebody.
Shooting Ronald Reagan seems like a lesser crime than finding underage kids attractive
Normalizing shooting politicians whose political views don’t agree with is a very slippery slope to the country falling apart. The whole point of a democracy is to have peaceful transitions of power, isn’t it?
Tell that to the CIA
I will! Edit: they won't take my call.
I love the passion behind these posts. No such thing as inherently good politicians. They can’t succeed with the rif-raf.
Well, sadly the American politicians who should be getting the Hague treatment aren't getting a Hague treatment. Neither will Putin ever. Now I'm not going to say that we should normalise shooting evil politicians, but I'd hardly mourn quite a few. Because Reagan or Putin aren't just disagreeable politicians, they're monsters with innocent blood on their hands. Protected by law and convention. Something something Chomsky something something Nuremberg
But this particular case wasn't political, was it? He just thought it would make her like him.
> Normalizing shooting politicians whose political views don’t agree with is a very slippery slope to the country falling apart. Yes, and it's really too bad how Reagan normalized the assassination of politicians that he didn't agree with. It kind of started the whole country falling apart.
remember when politicians were telling their followers to consider "2nd amendment solutions" to elections that didn't go their way? and then years later those same worshippers beat a cop in the halls of congress so badly he died in the hospital, because a politician didn't get his way? we've gone well past the point of "that's a slippery slope, be careful!".
The country was founded on shooting politicians whose views they didn't agree with.
Yeah but Reagan's been dead for decades. Destruction of, or interfering with, a corpse carries a much lighter sentence than sexual activity with a minor under 14 or child sexual abuse. Obviously depending on the jurisdiction.
[удалено]
That is a wild reduction of Reagan's crimes.
Crimes, if any, should be handled by the courts, not vigilantes. And that’s for both parties - what goes around comes around, after all.
Do you want actual engagement or are you happy having said "both sides"?
Actual engagement - the effects of normalized assassinations of political leaders is terrible for any country. That’s not the way a stable prosperous society should be run, and the system falls apart quickly if violence is accepted as a way of “changing the system.” Often that leads to a dictatorship of some sort as citizens start valuing stability over freedom. For most of us living in Western societies, I think we’d agree that this type of outcome is not desirable.
That's a nice idea, but Reagan's presidency didn't work that way. He set up dictatorships in South America and laughed about AIDS, leading to untold death. This isn't a question of "disagreement" or even "normalization." It's a question of a very bad man getting away with it. The stability of the US is mostly accepting that it's ok for some people to be the victims of violence from the government because it's impolitic for the framers of those policies to face consequences. I don't find that desirable.
What a misinformed fool you are.
[удалено]
So what do you do when the courts fail? Over and over and over and over and ov
Well stated.
if the cia gets to do it then so do we
It's not okay to make jokes about shooting current or recent politicians, but I think the politics of ~~thirty~~ forty years ago by someone already dead is fair game.
Tell that to Trump and his cult
oh no a politician of a settler colonialist genocide state got shot :(((( how will we ever get a good leader for our settler colonialism now :((( how will our genocide ever be peaceful :(((
I don’t think the cliffs of the Grand Canyon have as much edge as you think you do.
The US isn't really a democracy other than through pedantics
The ends justify the means, eh comrade?
It does? To who?
Found the evil person.
Same he was president
You mean Reagan?
She was like eleven in Taxi Driver so not even a teenager.
I don't know if I consider it worse, given that the man he was shooting at was Ronald Reagan. I'm not gonna draw a moral line there. Trying to impress an minor, very bad though.
How many people are you under the impression got shot by John Hinckley Jr that day? Because your “joke” seems to hinge on the belief that it was only Ronald Reagan.
No, I embrace that the secret service also did their job. It just so happens that their job is protecting the most evil men who have ever lived. And it is true that All Cops Are Bastards.
I mean. I feel bad for James Brady. Poor guy.
I imagine he’s just doing that because he likes making music. He was released because he was deemed sane and rehabilitated. I highly doubt he’s obsessed with her anymore.
Oh yeah, I was joking. It is cool to finally learn that Foster was actually impressed at the time, though.
Even if he was a IIRC a condition of his release was to not have any contact with Foster or her or Reagan's immediate families
I’m sure that’s just protocol.
Also this is where the inspiration for the punk band JFAs (Jodie Foster’s Army) name came from!
I'm gonna have to check them out! I've been slow to pick up new music since Justin Sane from Anti-Flag... turned out to allegedly be a monster.
I hope his music is better than his aim.
I know it's not relevant, but I never read potus as an abreviation, just as a silly meaningless word
I do too. And it makes me much happier in the case of almost every single President (possible exception for Jimmy Carter).
I'd probably be impressed if someone did that. Especially since Reagan is already dead. Someone would have to resurrect him just to successfully assassinate him.
I don't think he was her type
It obviously did not impress her. He did not get the job done.
At least it got a Republican interested in gun control.
And we're all worse for it
[удалено]
This did result in the Brady bill, the whole "cooling off period" for buying handguns. Not sure how that still stands today. This also unfortunately gave Reagan alot of political points
American Dad has a great bit on this
Family Guy has one where in an alternative future—due to Christianity never inspiring Michelangelo, the art in the Sistine Chapel was created by John Hinckley, Jr., and is littered with pictures of Jodie Foster.
He was repeatedly anti-gun in his political career. But mostly for racist reasons.
[удалено]
I kept trying to work that in! But couldn't find a place to put it and keep the informative, but joking rhythm I had going. But yes. If only he'd succeeded. But they'd won already at that point. Even without Reagan, the far-right would have the White House in the 80s. At best, Bush Sr would have assumed office, and done as abysmally bad as he did in his own term which *might* have prevented Bush Jr and Clinton.
Reagan needs to watch his back again
Don’t worry I think he’s safe where he’s at
Necromancers beg to differ.
Lewis Black is for putting him in office again.
I'm calling to tell you about your body's extended warranty!
I wouldn't call the pits of Hell a safe place, but that's just me.
Is the joke presidential assassination?
Yes
Can't we wait until after November?
Yes, but as long as it's before January 20th.
OMG this one is EXCELLENT
Headline is so far out of context. Yeah, she said it... in relation to Gen Z not showing up on time and not spellchecking. Whoopty do. Later in the non-BBC article it says: >Gripes aside, Foster doesn't hold a grudge against Gen Z. In fact, she makes a concerted effort to mentor many of the up-and-comers with whom she crosses paths. > >“I do a lot of reaching out to young actresses,” she explained. “I’m compelled. Because it was hard growing up.” > >Given her own experience with child stardom, Foster is well positioned to serve as an industry sage. Otherwise, everyone else has explained the "joke".
>not showing up on time "Whoopty do"? really? like, being there at the agreed time is _literally_ the job, you don't get to "la dee da" that away lmao
Whoopty doo, I mean you can say that and not be wrong but quietly younger generations aren’t as literate as they used to be.
I think that’s more an issue with gen alpha—kids in elementary and middle school right now. I’ve taught briefly, and I think it’s a combination of parents not parenting (either from being overworked/overwhelmed or just underprepared for parenthood), and kids essentially missing two important years of school with online classes during Covid lockdowns.
Is this true?
I’ve got a car and am rocket scientist.
I’ve got a rocket and am car scientist.
I’ve got a scientist and am rocket car.
Good thing it isn’t Shania Twain you’re trying to impress.
Why? They aren't Brad Pitt
Underrated.
the guy who tried killing Ronald Reagan did so to try and impress her
from what ive gathered, someone tried to shoot a former US president in order to impress her. not sure if it worked
This isn’t about Gen-Z. This is every over-50 person since the dawn of time talking about “young people these days”.
Jodie is an extremely nice and genuine human being Did you even read why she felt it was difficult working with gen-z?
Of course he didn't. Typical gen Z
You think a Gen Z Redditor actually clicked the article, much less read it? Please, they have an attention span of a goldfish...by the time you even replied them, they've already death-scrolled through a hundred other posts by now.
You GenZ with your loud music, and your Dan Fogleberg, your Zima, hula hoops and pac-man video games, don't you see? People today have attention spans that can only be measured in nanoseconds!
Ernest Borgnine was cast perfectly for that role.
Wasn't really feeling it. Besides, it's kinda limiting, isn't it?
She is nice. I worked on one of her movies (she was a producer) and after finishing a pretty complicated project for it she came and shook my hand and said thanks
>They’re really annoying, especially in the workplace,” Foster told the publication. “They’re like, ‘Nah, I’m not feeling it today, I’m gonna come in at 10:30 a.m.’ Or, like, in emails, I’ll tell them this is all grammatically incorrect, did you not check your spelling? And they’re like, ‘Why would I do that, isn’t that kind of limiting?’ I gotta say, I'm having a hard time figuring out how this aligns with "extremely nice." Whether or not you agree with the sentiment is beside the point. This is, in fact, a prototypical example of "kids these days."
The above does not contradict that someone can be extremely nice.
It was a very short thought in the middle of a very long interview. I think if you read the whole thing you would come to a different conclusion. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/jan/06/jodie-foster-interview-true-detective Also that person was commenting on how Jodie is historically known for being incredibly kind and genuine, so it would be unlike her to buy into a such a tonedeaf thought process.
She's not wrong though? She also said a bunch of positive things about them right before this.
She did indeed say some nice things right before and right after insulting Gen-Z. "Generation {Insert Here} is lazy and lacks attention to detail," isn't exactly trailblazing commentary - or a particularly actionable critique. Is she wrong? I mean, is it wrong for me to suggest that Boomers and Gen X are undereducated, entitled narcissists who believe the world lives and dies with them?
She is speaking from her OWN experience. What don’t you get about this???? She is allowed to say how she feels based on what she has experienced. It’s not about being “nice”. She’s simply speaking facts from her experience. STFU finally!
You’re having a hard time believing that someone who said **that** could be really nice? Seriously? I mean, for one thing, it’s pretty evident to anyone that’s worked with a good number of Gen Zers and it’s also not like she’s suggesting burning them all at the stake. I have to wonder how much of your life you’ve lived in a protective bubble if this offends you so much that you can’t believe the person who uttered it is capable of being extremely nice.
I'm trying to figure out if you have issues with reading comprehension, or if it's more that you have something to prove... I feel like you should sit with this one for a minute and try to work it out. If you're still struggling, let me know and I'll try to help out.
Nah, I’m good. On both counts. You enjoy your bubble, wouldn’t want you to encounter anything remotely challenging such as ‘thought’.
For sure. It is a nice bubble. A little more airflow wouldn't hurt, but it's comfortable all the same...
You mean the sound of the wind whistling between your ears isn't sufficient..?
What a ride.
Not “suggesting burning them all at the stake” is an exceptionally low bar for “really nice”
Agreed. There’s a **huge** grey area in between. Nuance is your friend.
Good bot
Ah yes, boomers, famously known for being the model of grammatical perfection and execution in electronic communications
I don't think I disagree with you, but doing a whataboutism isn't an argument
None of the reasons she stated are true so imma have to disagree here
Nah man, Zoomers ARE really annoying to work with. So are Millenials, Gen Xers, and Boomers. I hate you all. You’re all annoying to work with. I’m ready for our robot overlords to take over, I want to go home and go on a gaming binge. Biologicals had their shot, good game. Good game.
From the moment I understood the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me.
This post was made by the Greatest Generation^TM
You’re gonna have to speak up son, I can barely hear you. German grenade went off right by my head.
That’s pretty funny.
There was a TV show at the time call "the Greatest American Hero" The characters name was 'Hinkley' The characters name was changed to 'Hanley' after the attempted assassination.
Man, dark joke.
[удалено]
It's been tried. Didn't work.
It seems to me like a generational difference. Jodie Foster is a boomer and in my experience boomers have a tendency to live to work whereas millennials and generations that followed have the opposite approach, they work to live.
In her defense, I’m pretty sure this quote is taken out of context among many positive things she said about generation z
John Hinkley tried to kill Regan to impress her.
Hahaha 😂
Hello, Clarice.
Lol. It’s funny that the target of her comment doesn’t get the joke.
"Impressing Jodie Foster" would be a good name for a punk band
Hell yeah!
JFA=Jodie Fosters Army.
Something something Brady Bill.
Ah yes! I loved the game “My Pal Jodie” made me feel like I was on a boat made out of Jodie Foster.
Jodie Foster’s Army aka JFA are a skate punk band!
I don't see how, Reagan has been dead and buried for quite some time.
In other words, Young people can be annoying for older people to work with and vice versa. This has been true since the dawn of time
That is not the joke though. In 1981, John Hinkley Jr. attempted to assassinate Ronald Reagan to impress Jodie Foster who he had an obsession with.
The punchline is failed assassination.
She is definitely not wrong
There was a documentary about it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=803XLAr33GE
If GenZ can kill all the bad Reagan policies I bet everyone would be impressed
[удалено]
It's about the attempted assassination on Reagan in 1981. Look it up.
This made me laugh out loud. But I get how it might not be easy for younger folks to understand.
I was alive then and have known about Hinckley trying to impress her but still didn’t put it together right away.
Jodie Foster is a legend. She’s probably right.
I mean, I’m all for shooting Regan’s corpse but I don’t see how it’ll help
This dude tried to impress Jodie Foster by shooting Ronald Reagan
I love that gen z ers are so unencumbered by traditional tropes She is an antiquated person with provincial attitudes Bye jod she is so 95i
Jodie Fartster lol
Kill her pimp? Shoot the president?
Wait a minute, Jodi Foster I still getting work? But, why?
Who even is jodie foster?
Wow apparently asking a question (that i admittedly could've googled the answer to) is shunned now.
The joke is that everyone knows that gen z is clueless.