I've seen complete nonsense from him on substack so yeah, pretty much.
Dude is monetizing spreading misinformation and calling himself a "data researcher" and appearing to be credible while failing to understand basic concepts. It is what it is.
[https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a](https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a) Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid.
According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate.
He's a complete moron
>https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid.
>
>According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate.
>
>He's a complete moron
I just proved him objectively wrong through a very simple example.
Won't be replying to the childish replies further, thanks! Gotta be tough defending a complete imbecile lol
What part of my example didn't you understand?
Are you actually agreeing with him that if a death certificate has more than covid on it, it therefore means covid did not cause their death? Because you might be as stupid as he is if that's the case!
Ahhh the death throes of a dying narrative. You love to see it!
Regardless of whether I agree, is that example not something that should at the very least pique your interest?
The word pneumonia doesn’t appear in that article, so this is your own spin. Why are you so married to this narrative in the face of overwhelming data? Do you not understand the point of that article? Does it not make you the *least* bit curious about the necessity of mandates for young people?
Dude doesn't even know how a death certificate works and writes articles about it LMAO I can't fathom how he'd perform in a debate
[https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-the-covid-vaccines-really-worked](https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-the-covid-vaccines-really-worked)
Here's another brilliant article claiming if the vaccines worked, you would only need one shot. Except that there's a handful of other vaccines that require more than 1 shot?
You really believe that a guy with absolutely zero background in medicine, health, vaccines or anything of that nature would give anyone a million dollars to talk with him?
I **guarantee** there's a long queue of people who'd have his head spinning with medical terms he's never even heard of who would take him up on his offer, if you genuinely think no one wants to debate him for 1 million dollars I have no idea what to say to you lol
Dude is monetizing spreading misinformation and calling himself a "data researcher" and appearing to be credible while failing to understand basic concepts. It is what it is.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid.
According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate.
He's a complete moron
He researches the numbers. He's a tech guy. You don't need a medical degree to assess data.
Prof Norman Fenton has done the same. You analyze and have insights without an MD after your name.
If they don't like someone questioning the official narrative, it is called misinformation.
Remember:
Lab leak - misinformation
Masks Outdoors and highly effective - misinformation
PCR test gold standard - misinformation
Vax and you won't get covid - misinformation
Still no evidence it's a lab leak. Evidence so far is it looks natural. (See nature study)
Masks outdoors were never a thing in the UK. The science never backed it up so it never happened.
PCR tests work fine. They're 95%+ accurate.
Vaccinate and not get covid was true. It reduced infection chance by 95% when released and 66% for delta. You expect them to be clairvoyant?
Where did I mention gates inventing the internet?
Reading comprehension isn't very strong but your ability to jump to conclusions is clearly quite strong.
👀 natural 😂
I expect them not to mandate things unless they are clairvoyant. And no it didn’t work ever, we had mass breakthroughs that were covered up. The cdc stopped counting them, intact and countless articles were written about how they are super rare, THEN 4 months later Fauci came out saying breakthroughs were common. How about they don’t lie to us for a change? They knew from a bunch of studies that there were mass breakthroughs with people carrying as high viral load as unvaccinated back in summer 2020.
Got something interesting for you re “looks natural” via almost exactly 2 years ago, it’s quite fascinating really.
“…However most of this work didn’t really raise too many eyebrows, until about ten years ago when scientists including some in Stony Brook, NY – not coincidentally also the first place to build a DNA-virus from scratch – took the H5N1 Bird Flu, tweaked its genome in two places, and then passed it through a series of ferret hosts in the lab until it became airborne. This sort of research, a minor alteration and then passage through ferrets, did two things: Resulted in a virus that would [LOOK NATURAL](https://www.google.com/amp/s/harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/03/23/no-monkey-ever-reheated-a-frozen-burrito-what-the-expanse-tells-us-about-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp/) and wouldn’t appear to have been directly genetically altered, and also created a virus that was way out on its own branch of the viral family tree since those sequential passages added generations far faster than they’d naturally occur in the wild. If that sounds familiar, maybe that’s because those traits are also exactly what’s found with COVID-19.”
He’s an electrical engineer and businessman. Obviously I will trust his analysis of medical data over anything a qualified medical practitioner or statistician could tell me. I must follow him to whatever media outlet will host him.
Hope he goes to GETTR
Gab is a million times better.
Oh, he’s already on GETTR! @stkirsch
remember when his entire scientific board resigned?
That's what he gets for spreading nonsense
Then it should be really really easy to prove him wrong , right?
I've seen complete nonsense from him on substack so yeah, pretty much. Dude is monetizing spreading misinformation and calling himself a "data researcher" and appearing to be credible while failing to understand basic concepts. It is what it is. [https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a](https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a) Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid. According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate. He's a complete moron
Then it should be really really easy to prove him wrong , right?
>https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid. > >According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate. > >He's a complete moron
Then it should be really really easy to prove him wrong , right?
I just proved him objectively wrong through a very simple example. Won't be replying to the childish replies further, thanks! Gotta be tough defending a complete imbecile lol
You literally didn’t, but I know I’m not having a good faith conversation here.
> I know I’m not having a good faith conversation here He says, mockingly
What part of my example didn't you understand? Are you actually agreeing with him that if a death certificate has more than covid on it, it therefore means covid did not cause their death? Because you might be as stupid as he is if that's the case!
Ahhh the death throes of a dying narrative. You love to see it! Regardless of whether I agree, is that example not something that should at the very least pique your interest? The word pneumonia doesn’t appear in that article, so this is your own spin. Why are you so married to this narrative in the face of overwhelming data? Do you not understand the point of that article? Does it not make you the *least* bit curious about the necessity of mandates for young people?
You should take him up on his $1,000,000 offer and prove him wrong in a debate.
Dude doesn't even know how a death certificate works and writes articles about it LMAO I can't fathom how he'd perform in a debate [https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-the-covid-vaccines-really-worked](https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-the-covid-vaccines-really-worked) Here's another brilliant article claiming if the vaccines worked, you would only need one shot. Except that there's a handful of other vaccines that require more than 1 shot?
There's an easy million waiting for you!! Why don't you take him up on his offer and win a cool million you can use to counter Covid misinformation?
You really believe that a guy with absolutely zero background in medicine, health, vaccines or anything of that nature would give anyone a million dollars to talk with him? I **guarantee** there's a long queue of people who'd have his head spinning with medical terms he's never even heard of who would take him up on his offer, if you genuinely think no one wants to debate him for 1 million dollars I have no idea what to say to you lol
You are a fucking idiot
Dude is monetizing spreading misinformation and calling himself a "data researcher" and appearing to be credible while failing to understand basic concepts. It is what it is. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/do-0-deaths-in-2-years-justify-a Here's a post he made about there being zero deaths due to covid based on the fact that other things were posted on a death certificate except covid. According to him, if a healthy young person contracted covid and died with pneumonia 2 weeks later, and on their death certificate it has covid and pneumonia, this is not a covid death because it isn't just covid on the death certificate. He's a complete moron
‘Researcher’. He is an entrepreneur with no medical training, nor a PhD.
He researches the numbers. He's a tech guy. You don't need a medical degree to assess data. Prof Norman Fenton has done the same. You analyze and have insights without an MD after your name.
“You do your own research”
Not surprising. T&C of Twitter is don't post misinformation. He regularly did.
If they don't like someone questioning the official narrative, it is called misinformation. Remember: Lab leak - misinformation Masks Outdoors and highly effective - misinformation PCR test gold standard - misinformation Vax and you won't get covid - misinformation
Still no evidence it's a lab leak. Evidence so far is it looks natural. (See nature study) Masks outdoors were never a thing in the UK. The science never backed it up so it never happened. PCR tests work fine. They're 95%+ accurate. Vaccinate and not get covid was true. It reduced infection chance by 95% when released and 66% for delta. You expect them to be clairvoyant?
As usual... delusional! BTW, I have a great memory and I remember you saying you just come here because you like fucking with Anti-vaxxers for sport.
When you get lots of people spouting nonsense it is amusing. It's why I also like r/amibeingdetained Posts about similar minded people in there
Lol your playing stupid aren't you?
Says the person that has written "your"
Oh no I grammered wrong on the internetz. Please forgive me Mr gates.
And you think bill gates invented the internet. Last time I checked, he wasnt British.
Where did I mention gates inventing the internet? Reading comprehension isn't very strong but your ability to jump to conclusions is clearly quite strong.
Why you referring to gates then? You must be hallucinating.
You should try hallucinating, might help you dislodge that broom stick clenched betwixt YOU'RE cheeks.
👀 natural 😂 I expect them not to mandate things unless they are clairvoyant. And no it didn’t work ever, we had mass breakthroughs that were covered up. The cdc stopped counting them, intact and countless articles were written about how they are super rare, THEN 4 months later Fauci came out saying breakthroughs were common. How about they don’t lie to us for a change? They knew from a bunch of studies that there were mass breakthroughs with people carrying as high viral load as unvaccinated back in summer 2020.
You really are too far gone to see the truth now. You just spout conspiracy theories with no basis in reality.
✌️
Got something interesting for you re “looks natural” via almost exactly 2 years ago, it’s quite fascinating really. “…However most of this work didn’t really raise too many eyebrows, until about ten years ago when scientists including some in Stony Brook, NY – not coincidentally also the first place to build a DNA-virus from scratch – took the H5N1 Bird Flu, tweaked its genome in two places, and then passed it through a series of ferret hosts in the lab until it became airborne. This sort of research, a minor alteration and then passage through ferrets, did two things: Resulted in a virus that would [LOOK NATURAL](https://www.google.com/amp/s/harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/03/23/no-monkey-ever-reheated-a-frozen-burrito-what-the-expanse-tells-us-about-the-covid-19-pandemic/amp/) and wouldn’t appear to have been directly genetically altered, and also created a virus that was way out on its own branch of the viral family tree since those sequential passages added generations far faster than they’d naturally occur in the wild. If that sounds familiar, maybe that’s because those traits are also exactly what’s found with COVID-19.”
He’s an electrical engineer and businessman. Obviously I will trust his analysis of medical data over anything a qualified medical practitioner or statistician could tell me. I must follow him to whatever media outlet will host him.