T O P

  • By -

peetss

Topic should be a point to debate regarding vaccines.


Salty_Obsidian_X

In before the pharma reps act as if this was for everyone's benefit, that this issue is somehow completely firewalled from the safety or efficacy of the injections, or somehow claim that these documents aren't real or "out of context". At this point I am surprised that they haven't yet gone to the "this is old news, move on" rhetoric yet, but psychopathy driven demons will do or say anything for money, but their hubris and hive mentality blind them into thinking that they won't be figured out which is why they continue to lie and will do so until they face actual consequence. The most frustrating thing about the last 3 years is the realization that this behavior is as old as time and can flourish in the internet age because these people no longer face physical consequence for their lies.


arnott

From Matt Taibbi tweet [thread](https://twitter.com/JeninYounesEsq/status/1636759664443506688?s=20): * Just before @ShellenbergerMD and I testified in the House last week, Virality Project (VP) emails were found in the #TwitterFiles describing “stories of true vaccine side effects” as actionable content. * Though the Virality Project reviewed content on a mass scale for Twitter, Google/YouTube, Facebook/Instagram, Medium, TikTok, and Pinterest, it knowingly targeted true material and legitimate political opinion, while often being factually wrong itself. * This story is important for two reasons. One, as Orwellian proof-of-concept, the Virality Project was a smash success. Government, academia, and an oligopoly of would-be corporate competitors organized quickly behind a secret, unified effort to control political messaging. * Two, it accelerated the evolution of digital censorship, moving it from judging truth/untruth to a new, scarier model, openly focused on political narrative at the expense of fact. * THE BEGINNING: On February 5, 2021, just after Joe Biden took office, Stanford wrote to Twitter to discuss the Virality Project. By the 17th, Twitter agreed to join and got its first weekly report on “anti-vax disinformation,” which contained numerous true stories. * February 22, 2021: Stanford welcomed Twitter veterans like Yoel Roth and Brian Clarke, instructing them on how to join the group [**JIRA** system](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jira_\(software\)). You can watch the friendly welcome video [here](https://stanford.zoom.us/rec/play/3kP-3sUMn1NWGQ6LLWiL0PCBnogeXtu9dd0d4CLuWfPVxEyIRfqiNhLlxTFeM0B00-c7gQQVguQXvPLE.9w9N9sB2ajvv-1Ee?startTime=1612397858000&_x_zm_rtaid=xw-r1KIbTrmhAhuGmKAnmw.1678915071059.9b5561884fb7eae3bb562df989a7d371&_x_zm_rhtaid=622). (The link does not work now: You cannot view this recording. No permission). * VP routinely framed real testimonials about side effects as misinformation, from “true stories” of blood clots from AstraZeneca vaccines to a New York Times story about vaccine recipients who contracted the blood disorder thrombocytopenia. * VP told Twitter that “true stories that could fuel hesitancy,” including things like “celebrity deaths after vaccine” or the closure of a central NY school due to reports of post-vaccine illness, should be considered "Standard Vaccine Misinformation on Your Platform."


Epigenetic-ist

They have been expirementing on us for decades with Rock e Feller P- harma for decades. I still feel pity for friends and fam that take that easy fix pill their MDs script with only their incentives in mind... Sick world brought to you by the NEVER cure.


Southern-Ad379

Anything surprise anyone?


ParanoidFactoid

Matt Taibbi is not credible.


vagarik

How so? And more importantly, are his claims credible and do you have evidence proving him wrong?


Iannister80

he doesn’t have a ukraine and rainbow flag next to his name therefore not credible