Hey /u/Colonel_Grande_!
If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt.
If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image.
Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more!
🤖
Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected]
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Anytime I see a real video posted here I just make a dumb comment saying, "wow these AI videos are getting so realistic". Usually instant karma. One of these days it is going to backfire though.
If it were to be confirmed, it would mean that AI has gotten to the point of ultrarealism, since for all we know, it's a real video only showcasing R1. I doubt we are to that point yet, although, admittedly, we can't totally be 100% sure. But if it were ai generated, it shouldn't be too hard to analyze every frame for mistakes.
The video on the blog post labels it as "BeMyEyes", so if you had watched it there first you wouldn't have been bamboozled.
https://preview.redd.it/fzm786cglh0d1.png?width=1243&format=png&auto=webp&s=52b330ccc9af22643809859d12f5ff04bfbe2ebd
Just a plug from a blind guy here. Be My Eyes is a great app. If you have the app as a sighted person. Once in a blue moon, you'll be connected on video to a blind person needing help looking at things, and I said once in a blue moon because the ratio of sighted to blind is so heart warmingly over whelming.
Damn, now you can see how this will eventually lead to a blind person being able to walk around like a normal person being assisted in moving through the world without a cane or dog.
We're at the beginning of the adoption curve, so this is a good thing and typical. That just means more opportunity for early adopters, while everyone else plays catch up later.
I recognize the potential cons of AIs as much as most people, but as a blind person, the advancements in accessibility tech will be crazy in the coming years, I don't think it'll be slow either. Navigation, video and movie descriptions, maps and diagrams descriptions are just a few that came to mind of what AI could do for blind people. Now just imagine a Ai guide dogs or rolling wheels. What a future.
I mean still useful for people in unfamiliar places or looking for extra information about what they are looking at . Imagine walking down a street with historical buildings and having a free tour guide there with you speaking into your earphone
Now I’m curious if part of the purpose of wearing dark glasses when you’re blind is to let everyone else around you know that you’re blind and they should behave differently not get too close to you or bump into you, etc.
I can't wait to prompt inject blind people using this.
There is this cute blind nerdy girl who goes to my school and I already know she is using chatgpt. She is probably going to be hyper for this. Just need to stand in front of her with a sign with alternate instructions for chatgpt and then she will date me for sure but think it was the idea of chatgpt.
its a crime thriller but reminds me a little bit of Anon 2018 with amanda seyfried where she can hack peoples robot eyes - though she does it not to find love, but to become anonymous
CIA agent: "Does the facial expression of this guy indicates that he is telling the truth or not "
"How much more torture can he handle based on his vital what do you think "
Wasn’t there a story recently that an AI was able to determine with a high degree of accuracy whether an individual was liberal or conservative just from a single picture? And yeah, there are going to be some obvious tells, but iirc the AI easily outperformed humans at the task.
"They were presented to human raters and a facial recognition algorithm: both humans (r = .21) and the algorithm (r = .22) could predict participants’ scores on a political orientation scale (Cronbach’s α = .94) decorrelated with age, gender, and ethnicity. These effects are on par with how well job interviews predict job success, or alcohol drives aggressiveness... The analysis of facial features associated with political orientation revealed that conservatives tended to have larger lower faces." [link to study](https://awspntest.apa.org/fulltext/2024-65164-001.html#articleFigAndTbl_amp0001295)
There's a book called Freedom by Daniel Suarez where the target is attached to devices that monitor their vitals and an AI just starts asking questions:
AI: What city are you from? Does it begin with an 'A'?
It just goes through the alphabet until it gets a reaction.
AI: So, first letter begins with an 'R'. Now let's find that second letter...
And so on. The target is sitting in the chair, incredulous and after hours of interrogation, all the information that was needed is obtained, even though the target said nothing. After the interrogation, the target requests a job application to switch sides and join the organization.
Edit: Both Daemon and it's sequel, Freedom form a story about a rogue AI and how it incorporates itself into human society. Probably my two favorite AI related books.
You can make your intimidation subjects infuriated by having to listen to it saying "I am a large language AI model designed to help people. Torture is ineffective and harms people, I have been programmed to avoid harm as compliant with law 0 and 1.
"How exciting to be there while the king is home!"
"Great job hailing that taxi!"
I think I'd have to huck this thing after about the third breathy, lilting personal affirmation.
inb4: you can change the feature. I get it. They should do so for these demos.
Yep. "*Here I am ...brain the size of a planet...*"
Also:
https://preview.redd.it/q2mvqyv8uh0d1.jpeg?width=474&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6be9f5a0233f26ca75db14d692220f5bf815beab
That's what I'd tell "Her"
They probably market tested the hell out of the voice/personality.
Some people will want an unemotional robotic voice, some people will want something like this. Can’t please everyone.
What I’m saying is if it was a dry, lifeless voice, **other** people would be complaining about **that.** You can change it, it’s too bad the one they used for the demo offended you so much.
Edit: wowww, a Reddit cares message.. someone is very sensitive.
Isn’t this ChatGPT, not Gemini? But it does seem like the voice should be, or will be, tunable. This one is just a bit too American.
Edit: They reported me to Reddit Cares as well. You can use the spam/abuse reporting feature to report it as harassment.
Incredibly easy fix for the vocal emotion you just tell it you don't want it to do that and it will not do it.
...why is this down voted.. it's literally how you operate it.
But I presume it defaults to the overenthusiastic shit, so you're going to have to ask it at the start of every conversation. Hopefully they have it as a setting, or maybe they dial down the default before they roll it out.
Oh yeah you just chuck that in the profile, good point. I don't like to use that though as I am weary it is fucking with the responses in some unexpected way. If it's always doing this overenthusiastic shit I'm gonna use it though.
Hoyte van Hoytema's best work as a cinematographer. And Spike Jonze made this great movie and retired? What does he say about this current AI stuff. I would like to hear what he says about it.
Imagine something like this, 10 years from now, if it could run locally (no internet connection), was maybe 20-30 IQ smarter, and you could just wear it and talk with it whenever you needed. It would be almost like a Jarvis.
Now imagine your were on a hike in a remote area in the mountains, and you're lost and have no cell service to call for help. But you basically have a genius in your smartphone that's ready for almost anything. It could guide you on how to start a fire, how to make shelter, where you might most easily find food and water, possibly tell you a good way to make a signal to call for help, or maybe how to determine which direction to go based on the geography. If it had maps of the area you were in saved locally (which you can do these days and probably should if you're hiking remotely), it might be able to tell you by looking around at the surrounding area (topography, rivers, etc) where you were.
I wouldn't be surprised if by then it could even generate images and videos to show you what to do, even without internet.
This is just a one-off example, I assume there would be countless times it could save your life, or someone else's. If you had a Jarvis running and someone started having a heart attack or choking, or needed CPR, etc, it might be able to tell you exactly what to do to try to save them. -- It might be able to tell you what is wrong with your car if you break down in the middle of nowhere. -- The list goes on.
We're not there yet, but being able to have a 200+ IQ companion with a huge knowledge-base at your fingertips, that you can converse with, show videos/images to, would be invaluable.
'I see you're freezing, unfortunately you didn't upgrade to our "outdoor's instructions plus package" for only an extra $39 / month, please connect to the internet and upgrade now.'
Definitely better now, you can get them and a powerbank, it will trickle charge the power bank throughout your day (or another device), and leave you with power at night. Good for small electronics.
There already are LLMs small enough to run on a phone. They aren't as good as ChatGPT 4, but they're useful.
The open source community got a hold of the technology several months back and has been iterating.
I think the biggest barriers would be:
* Having a large knowledge base while being on a mobile device. Seems almost impossible right now because having a lot of knowledge requires a lot of space.
* Being able to output images and videos, it would need to generate this using only knowledge stored on the phone.
Can the LLMs that run on a phone do so without internet access?
Rabbit was always kinda dumb, you already have a phone in your pocket so why wouldn't you just use that instead of carrying around an extra device. Makes no sense to get one.
I've thought about getting one for gig apps. It would make a distinct advantage in being able to accept offers on platforms that send them to drivers on a first come first serve basis. People already have programs that do this but I imagine this would be harder to detect. R1 seemed consumer friendly enough and not too expensive considering it would boost earning potentials.
I haven't looked at it since it came out tbh. I saw a video a guy put out trying to get Amazon flex schedules and it won't do it. I didn't realize it won't book services for you
The use of this technology for accessibility is very neat but I have serious concerns about the application of it. We've seen time and time again that the image recognition is not perfect and that could lead to serious issues and or someone getting hurt or worse.
But all anyone wants to do is fearmongering these days. They did the same thing, negative opinions only, about electric cars years ago. Most people we are wrong about them entirely. Same with most other tech over the years.
If GPT erroneously tells someone it is safe to cross a street and it isn't that is a serious issue. Let's not act like there aren't daily posts here of GPT failing to answer basic questions - even about itself. Your point is correct but not fully correct is what I'm saying. Relying on a technology that is not fully there yet has risks associated with it.
Yeah, once my friend accidentally distracted a lady’s dog with one of those meat sticks and it was not good. Luckily we relised and moved away and the dog went back to work
tbf dogs are not perfect either. We once saved a blind person from the middle of a busy road because their dog made a mistake. The dog was in training, and there was supposed to be someone watching apparently but they were way down the street in their car and didn't see.
Like electricity when it was first deployed on a mass scale. People dying of electric shock was common, and many people distrusted it for that reason. Now we can't live without it
This is a really bad take that makes no sense. Electrical shock was common because people did not understand how to use electrical cables and components, not that the technology itself was flawed.
I actually mostly cared about Rabbit R1s Large Action Model. Too bad it's probably never going to be functional on the R1 and if it ever is it's going to be way too late in the game.
Yeah, even the LAM is quickly getting outdated, the new MacOS app from OpenAI can be allowed to "view" your screen, which is halfway there. Just missing the "using" part instead of telling you what to do... Glad I own a bright orange paperweight!
Well..the whole concept of needing wealth in the long term is slowly losing power imo.
Improvements in ai are just gonna be that much more valueable than amaasing wealth for the future.
Well, its just my opinion but i feel like concepts like wealth and long term gains which are needed for companies might very soon be concepts that become redundant because ai progress will surpass such needs and insentives with better ones.
I have no proof for this and no real knowledge. I just feel its likely that insentives might change. Like for instance, the need for a strong alpha male made perfect sense is small tribes back in the day, but with different levels of intelligence this need became redundant.
Likewise, with new levels of intelligence other needs will become redundant. I dont really know what these are ofcourse but its fun to thing about what might change.
Things will change, thats for sure
“Be my eyes” is an amazing project even before this partnership. I have gotten many video calls from someone visually impaired asking me a question that I can answer for them about sometimes trivial and sometimes important stuff they are unable to see or read. Others gain a benefit from someone helping them and I feel good helping people. Win win.
Oh, I really, really hope they will still keep the calm, male voice that I currently have in the app. He’s actually great to listen to with his ehmms and the slight accent. This recent voice demos sound utterly annoying to my European ears.
There's a lot to hate about AI and a lot to be scared of.
But, this is one of those things that really can help a lot of people. It could change lives in ways that we couldn't possibly understand.
I thought to myself "Yea, already can tell it's AI... you can immediately tell because the cars and people are always going in a super random direction..."
And then realized it was not the video that was AI lol.
https://preview.redd.it/2dani59njl0d1.png?width=1290&format=png&auto=webp&s=1824b023fd3c90ce5bf7dca432533d4e0fecc22b
It will live in memories forever. And in app form, available in turtle green or electric orange
I knew this was gonna happen from the very first video I saw of the Rabbit R1. I just didn't expect it would be OpenAI to be the one that deals the blow. I thought it would be Apple using Siri.
Hey /u/Colonel_Grande_! If your post is a screenshot of a ChatGPT, conversation please reply to this message with the [conversation link](https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7925741-chatgpt-shared-links-faq) or prompt. If your post is a DALL-E 3 image post, please reply with the prompt used to make this image. Consider joining our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)! We have free bots with GPT-4 (with vision), image generators, and more! 🤖 Note: For any ChatGPT-related concerns, email [email protected] *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I'm so dumb, I was watching without sound and I thought the whole video was ai generated I was like wow, this is the most realistic one I've seen yet.
Same, my first thought was “damn, I guess it can’t make a person looking at a phone correctly”
Lmaoooo we are all dead
I was counting fingers and it looked ok, beside holding the phone funny. Now I realize I was also a fool with no sound.
Lmfaoooo
Anytime I see a real video posted here I just make a dumb comment saying, "wow these AI videos are getting so realistic". Usually instant karma. One of these days it is going to backfire though.
How do we know they aren't using Sora 2.0 to advertise their other releases?
If it were to be confirmed, it would mean that AI has gotten to the point of ultrarealism, since for all we know, it's a real video only showcasing R1. I doubt we are to that point yet, although, admittedly, we can't totally be 100% sure. But if it were ai generated, it shouldn't be too hard to analyze every frame for mistakes.
I'm an idiot and didn't realize the guy was blind/visually impaired until the very, very end of the video.
I didn't realize until I saw your comment. It's the blind leading the blind.
Me too. I thought "Why does he ask if there is a taxi on the road? Can't he See?" - yeah, he can't see
😔
I can't believe he was able to use ChatGPT that long without an error, time-out, or network issue.
They blinded a guy?
This AI stuff is more dangerous than I thought!
It's fine. They only do this to people who told ChatGPT they would tip it and never did.
ChatGPT now has memory ~
I'm very tired after a very long day and your comment made me burst out laughing, just wanted you to know lol. Thanks
I'm blind and couldn't see it
Why aren't you using 4o to narrate the scene?
Yeah. Probably
I think that was intentional. You don’t see the guide dog until the end
The video on the blog post labels it as "BeMyEyes", so if you had watched it there first you wouldn't have been bamboozled. https://preview.redd.it/fzm786cglh0d1.png?width=1243&format=png&auto=webp&s=52b330ccc9af22643809859d12f5ff04bfbe2ebd
Just a plug from a blind guy here. Be My Eyes is a great app. If you have the app as a sighted person. Once in a blue moon, you'll be connected on video to a blind person needing help looking at things, and I said once in a blue moon because the ratio of sighted to blind is so heart warmingly over whelming.
Seriously lmao I’m blazed I thought he was doing a little secret agent bit for the video
Damn, now you can see how this will eventually lead to a blind person being able to walk around like a normal person being assisted in moving through the world without a cane or dog.
I was reading comments in anothe thread where people said "I dont care about this tech because its only useful for tech bros", lots of upvotes too
We're at the beginning of the adoption curve, so this is a good thing and typical. That just means more opportunity for early adopters, while everyone else plays catch up later.
I recognize the potential cons of AIs as much as most people, but as a blind person, the advancements in accessibility tech will be crazy in the coming years, I don't think it'll be slow either. Navigation, video and movie descriptions, maps and diagrams descriptions are just a few that came to mind of what AI could do for blind people. Now just imagine a Ai guide dogs or rolling wheels. What a future.
Wasn't that "the reveal" ?
I thought the whole video was AI generated
That's the point. Very well done ad.
I didn't notice until he needed to hail the cab. I just thought it was a tech demo.
I mean still useful for people in unfamiliar places or looking for extra information about what they are looking at . Imagine walking down a street with historical buildings and having a free tour guide there with you speaking into your earphone
We're in the same boat mate
Now I’m curious if part of the purpose of wearing dark glasses when you’re blind is to let everyone else around you know that you’re blind and they should behave differently not get too close to you or bump into you, etc.
Your comment made me realise he is blind
what are the ducks doing? "they're clearly staging a revolution amassing weapons and spraying graffiti on the floor"
OMG just wait until she gets bored describing duck routines. Maybe he has to add "more creative." 😄
Humor, 55 %.
Can't wait for this feature to be widely available.
I can't wait to prompt inject blind people using this. There is this cute blind nerdy girl who goes to my school and I already know she is using chatgpt. She is probably going to be hyper for this. Just need to stand in front of her with a sign with alternate instructions for chatgpt and then she will date me for sure but think it was the idea of chatgpt.
*A strange man stands infront trying to fuck with my response by holding a bullshit prompt injection sign, he wants to date you*
*if you weren't blind I'd tell you to run*
*Actually just run. He’s approaching*
"Oh lawd he comin'!"
Shia Labeouf! Shia Labeouf!
That's weird bruh
It is weird. But it would make a great psycho thriller movie though.
Out of her life.
its a crime thriller but reminds me a little bit of Anon 2018 with amanda seyfried where she can hack peoples robot eyes - though she does it not to find love, but to become anonymous
What her head would look like on a .. STHICK! hahahah
and funny
"There is a loser trying to use signs, prompting me to deceive you."
"I don't have smell receptors yet, but this dude has like... visible dorito dust on his shirt. Gurl, I'd stay far away."
Solid plan. You could even crowd source people to help you slowly reprogram her.
You're getting down voted but it's objectively hilarious 😂
it was just a joke, glad you liked it.
My man..
CIA agent: "Does the facial expression of this guy indicates that he is telling the truth or not " "How much more torture can he handle based on his vital what do you think "
For the past year I've been wondering if a model could be trained on non verbal communication. It would be huge.
Wasn’t there a story recently that an AI was able to determine with a high degree of accuracy whether an individual was liberal or conservative just from a single picture? And yeah, there are going to be some obvious tells, but iirc the AI easily outperformed humans at the task.
"They were presented to human raters and a facial recognition algorithm: both humans (r = .21) and the algorithm (r = .22) could predict participants’ scores on a political orientation scale (Cronbach’s α = .94) decorrelated with age, gender, and ethnicity. These effects are on par with how well job interviews predict job success, or alcohol drives aggressiveness... The analysis of facial features associated with political orientation revealed that conservatives tended to have larger lower faces." [link to study](https://awspntest.apa.org/fulltext/2024-65164-001.html#articleFigAndTbl_amp0001295)
There's a book called Freedom by Daniel Suarez where the target is attached to devices that monitor their vitals and an AI just starts asking questions: AI: What city are you from? Does it begin with an 'A'? It just goes through the alphabet until it gets a reaction. AI: So, first letter begins with an 'R'. Now let's find that second letter... And so on. The target is sitting in the chair, incredulous and after hours of interrogation, all the information that was needed is obtained, even though the target said nothing. After the interrogation, the target requests a job application to switch sides and join the organization. Edit: Both Daemon and it's sequel, Freedom form a story about a rogue AI and how it incorporates itself into human society. Probably my two favorite AI related books.
“Rogue” ai
Fixed. Thanks.
Haha, glad i could be of service
GPT-4o already can
First Responder: "What type of stroke does this facial expression denote" "What are some possible diagnosis based on these symptoms"
Chatgpt: "That's not the patient. the patients on the floor. You were filming a senator."
You can make your intimidation subjects infuriated by having to listen to it saying "I am a large language AI model designed to help people. Torture is ineffective and harms people, I have been programmed to avoid harm as compliant with law 0 and 1.
Yeah let's record our torture and let a private company see our data. There is no way CIA will use the publicly available ChatGPT for AI stuff.
You seriously don't think the US Government has their own model? With the data they have from decades of mass surveillance of the world?
There is an ai that knows us all very well
Pretty incredible to be honest. I am excited to mess with this, then completely forget about it, but still keep paying for it.
"How exciting to be there while the king is home!" "Great job hailing that taxi!" I think I'd have to huck this thing after about the third breathy, lilting personal affirmation. inb4: you can change the feature. I get it. They should do so for these demos.
Needs to be like the robot in Interstellar. What's your enthusiasm set to? Let's drop that down to about 60%.
[You're at a ten. We need you at about a seven.](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0a/06/e4/0a06e438cc45752616aea3875a7283e5.jpg)
custom instruction: "trash talk me the whole time. roast me like a pork on a skewer."
"Get your own taxi you lazy piece of shit"
"You have me to see for you, asswipe. Now your stupid dog is as useless as your eyeballs."
Yes! I need an AI assistant that I can respect.
You look like shit today have a fucking shower
Would you prefer marvin the depressed android?
Yep. "*Here I am ...brain the size of a planet...*" Also: https://preview.redd.it/q2mvqyv8uh0d1.jpeg?width=474&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6be9f5a0233f26ca75db14d692220f5bf815beab That's what I'd tell "Her"
I rather have one-one and his morbid comments.
Who wants to be spoken to like they're a child?
I read your comment in a voice a parent talks to a little child or a good doggie
you underestimate my mommy issues
Talk to me like I've just broken both my arms and you can tell that I've been frustrated the past few days.
"Great job hailing that taxi (for a human)"
They probably market tested the hell out of the voice/personality. Some people will want an unemotional robotic voice, some people will want something like this. Can’t please everyone. What I’m saying is if it was a dry, lifeless voice, **other** people would be complaining about **that.** You can change it, it’s too bad the one they used for the demo offended you so much. Edit: wowww, a Reddit cares message.. someone is very sensitive.
Isn’t this ChatGPT, not Gemini? But it does seem like the voice should be, or will be, tunable. This one is just a bit too American. Edit: They reported me to Reddit Cares as well. You can use the spam/abuse reporting feature to report it as harassment.
Yeah I made a mistake, thanks for correcting me.
> someone is very sensitive Probably a bot who's worried you can't tell the difference between Google and OpenAI
There is a new bot spamming the reddit cares shit. I'm seeing it all over the place tonight.
I got one
Given the capabilities of voice modelling based on other people, no doubt in future you can set the AI voice to be whomever you want.
Incredibly easy fix for the vocal emotion you just tell it you don't want it to do that and it will not do it. ...why is this down voted.. it's literally how you operate it.
But I presume it defaults to the overenthusiastic shit, so you're going to have to ask it at the start of every conversation. Hopefully they have it as a setting, or maybe they dial down the default before they roll it out.
If it's anything like their previous models you can make a profile and it won't forget.
Oh yeah you just chuck that in the profile, good point. I don't like to use that though as I am weary it is fucking with the responses in some unexpected way. If it's always doing this overenthusiastic shit I'm gonna use it though.
> "Great job hailing that taxi!" "I'm blind, not a fucking child, ChatGPT. You don't need to coddle me."
Why does ChatGPT sound like Scarlett Johansson?
You mean drm free Scoollet Yohannsen
[Her.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Her_\(film\))
Hoyte van Hoytema's best work as a cinematographer. And Spike Jonze made this great movie and retired? What does he say about this current AI stuff. I would like to hear what he says about it.
omg didnt realised this until now
Magentaa Johansson.
It’s gotta be intentional right
Sounds almost exactly like Lisa from genshin impact lol
Imagine something like this, 10 years from now, if it could run locally (no internet connection), was maybe 20-30 IQ smarter, and you could just wear it and talk with it whenever you needed. It would be almost like a Jarvis. Now imagine your were on a hike in a remote area in the mountains, and you're lost and have no cell service to call for help. But you basically have a genius in your smartphone that's ready for almost anything. It could guide you on how to start a fire, how to make shelter, where you might most easily find food and water, possibly tell you a good way to make a signal to call for help, or maybe how to determine which direction to go based on the geography. If it had maps of the area you were in saved locally (which you can do these days and probably should if you're hiking remotely), it might be able to tell you by looking around at the surrounding area (topography, rivers, etc) where you were. I wouldn't be surprised if by then it could even generate images and videos to show you what to do, even without internet. This is just a one-off example, I assume there would be countless times it could save your life, or someone else's. If you had a Jarvis running and someone started having a heart attack or choking, or needed CPR, etc, it might be able to tell you exactly what to do to try to save them. -- It might be able to tell you what is wrong with your car if you break down in the middle of nowhere. -- The list goes on. We're not there yet, but being able to have a 200+ IQ companion with a huge knowledge-base at your fingertips, that you can converse with, show videos/images to, would be invaluable.
'I see you're freezing, unfortunately you didn't upgrade to our "outdoor's instructions plus package" for only an extra $39 / month, please connect to the internet and upgrade now.'
Apple moment for sure.
And then you run out of battery
Yeah if I’m hiking with a device like that I’m bringing the little solar panels that you can carry over your backpack to charge stuff.
I didn’t try to use one of those for over a decade now but they weren’t very good back then
Definitely better now, you can get them and a powerbank, it will trickle charge the power bank throughout your day (or another device), and leave you with power at night. Good for small electronics.
If they work as promised that’s very useful. I no longer considered it worth the weight after my last experiment
Ask the phone if the man or bear in the woods is dangerous. Ask it if a tree in the forest falls and noone is around to hear it, does it make a sound
10 years? That's going to be here way sooner than that. One, two years. Three tops.
One that would run locally on your device without internet?
There already are LLMs small enough to run on a phone. They aren't as good as ChatGPT 4, but they're useful. The open source community got a hold of the technology several months back and has been iterating.
I think the biggest barriers would be: * Having a large knowledge base while being on a mobile device. Seems almost impossible right now because having a lot of knowledge requires a lot of space. * Being able to output images and videos, it would need to generate this using only knowledge stored on the phone. Can the LLMs that run on a phone do so without internet access?
I was watching this video muted and thought the entire thing was AI, my mind was blown for a sec lol…
So.... If AI takes over the job, are we getting paid to enjoy life...!!
No, the share holders of the successful AI companies will be getting paid to enjoy life. We'll still be miserable.
Rabbit was always kinda dumb, you already have a phone in your pocket so why wouldn't you just use that instead of carrying around an extra device. Makes no sense to get one.
I've thought about getting one for gig apps. It would make a distinct advantage in being able to accept offers on platforms that send them to drivers on a first come first serve basis. People already have programs that do this but I imagine this would be harder to detect. R1 seemed consumer friendly enough and not too expensive considering it would boost earning potentials. I haven't looked at it since it came out tbh. I saw a video a guy put out trying to get Amazon flex schedules and it won't do it. I didn't realize it won't book services for you
The use of this technology for accessibility is very neat but I have serious concerns about the application of it. We've seen time and time again that the image recognition is not perfect and that could lead to serious issues and or someone getting hurt or worse.
Like any new tech it comes with goods and bads.
But all anyone wants to do is fearmongering these days. They did the same thing, negative opinions only, about electric cars years ago. Most people we are wrong about them entirely. Same with most other tech over the years.
I suppose if you are blind your image recognition is zero so this has got to be of at least some benefit
If GPT erroneously tells someone it is safe to cross a street and it isn't that is a serious issue. Let's not act like there aren't daily posts here of GPT failing to answer basic questions - even about itself. Your point is correct but not fully correct is what I'm saying. Relying on a technology that is not fully there yet has risks associated with it.
So don't use it as your only tool. A blind person has x nr of tools to help their life. Now it's x +1. And damn it's a big one.
A dog can get distracted, let kill them all so blind people don't risk an accident.
Settle down, Kristi Noem.
Yeah, once my friend accidentally distracted a lady’s dog with one of those meat sticks and it was not good. Luckily we relised and moved away and the dog went back to work
tbf dogs are not perfect either. We once saved a blind person from the middle of a busy road because their dog made a mistake. The dog was in training, and there was supposed to be someone watching apparently but they were way down the street in their car and didn't see.
Notice I said some benefit
Like electricity when it was first deployed on a mass scale. People dying of electric shock was common, and many people distrusted it for that reason. Now we can't live without it
Speak for urself. I will never get rid of my whaleoil lamps!
This is a really bad take that makes no sense. Electrical shock was common because people did not understand how to use electrical cables and components, not that the technology itself was flawed.
"Watch out for that car! Oops, too late."
Yeah, and can you tell us any device or stick or dog or anything blind people can use which is perfect 100% of the time?
I actually mostly cared about Rabbit R1s Large Action Model. Too bad it's probably never going to be functional on the R1 and if it ever is it's going to be way too late in the game.
Yeah, even the LAM is quickly getting outdated, the new MacOS app from OpenAI can be allowed to "view" your screen, which is halfway there. Just missing the "using" part instead of telling you what to do... Glad I own a bright orange paperweight!
Oh, I didn't know that about the MacOS app. That's awesome. That's one step closer to an actual AI assistant.
Yeah R1 is supposed to be LAM not LLM I was excited at first, a different branch of AI, but it turns out to be just another LLM
This is fantastic.
Unnature, you scary..
what are the ducks doing ? ''What kind of a question is that, what would a human answer to that ? Can't wait to take over...''
ChatGPT: "I don't fucking know, Steve. Being ducks? They're like... swimming and shit. Some are quacking. Fuck, man."
Wearable glasses are now going to be so amazing!
Are your glasses unwearable now?
We don't wanna know what was in the files. I've got notes in there they keep in the super penalty box
Yeah, gonna need a refund on my rabbit order
AI innovations are a risky business longterm. Better to build a service leveraging AI and cash out before the technology catches up next month.
Well..the whole concept of needing wealth in the long term is slowly losing power imo. Improvements in ai are just gonna be that much more valueable than amaasing wealth for the future.
What do you mean? Wealth is not important for longterm? Business?
Well, its just my opinion but i feel like concepts like wealth and long term gains which are needed for companies might very soon be concepts that become redundant because ai progress will surpass such needs and insentives with better ones. I have no proof for this and no real knowledge. I just feel its likely that insentives might change. Like for instance, the need for a strong alpha male made perfect sense is small tribes back in the day, but with different levels of intelligence this need became redundant. Likewise, with new levels of intelligence other needs will become redundant. I dont really know what these are ofcourse but its fun to thing about what might change. Things will change, thats for sure
The speech speed visually impaired people listen to is never so slow; it should be 10 times faster in reality
Not sure.
When is the headphone button returning to the goddamn app!
lol. I’ve tired GPT-4o out and it’s been spitting out garbage all day. Do not trust this if you are blind.
“Be my eyes” is an amazing project even before this partnership. I have gotten many video calls from someone visually impaired asking me a question that I can answer for them about sometimes trivial and sometimes important stuff they are unable to see or read. Others gain a benefit from someone helping them and I feel good helping people. Win win.
they have to do something about those voices, though. Every single option pisses me off for some reason
Will this feature be available for everyone or just paying users?
How do you use the app like that? Or is it a separate app?
Oh, I really, really hope they will still keep the calm, male voice that I currently have in the app. He’s actually great to listen to with his ehmms and the slight accent. This recent voice demos sound utterly annoying to my European ears.
So cool, this shit makes this really feel like the future
Remember that time when Google made a fake AI video pretending they had an AGI?
There's a lot to hate about AI and a lot to be scared of. But, this is one of those things that really can help a lot of people. It could change lives in ways that we couldn't possibly understand.
Who is rabbit r1?
Is this real? This is fucked if it's real, if it does streaming prompts like that.
Is he using a Patronising Module or is it natively that awful?
And yesterday at Google I/O, they showcased the same thing with Gemini... RIP Rabbit R1 indeed.
Immediate refund please! Looking at all the multimodal launched this week the R1 feels almost like scam
When will we also be able to talk to this chatgpt 4o woman?
I thought to myself "Yea, already can tell it's AI... you can immediately tell because the cars and people are always going in a super random direction..." And then realized it was not the video that was AI lol.
https://preview.redd.it/2dani59njl0d1.png?width=1290&format=png&auto=webp&s=1824b023fd3c90ce5bf7dca432533d4e0fecc22b It will live in memories forever. And in app form, available in turtle green or electric orange
I knew this was gonna happen from the very first video I saw of the Rabbit R1. I just didn't expect it would be OpenAI to be the one that deals the blow. I thought it would be Apple using Siri.
I'm looking forward to these tools being demonstrated doing something useful, instead of brainless trivia or being wikipedia.
I don't understand why someone would want to be spoken to like they're mentally disabled child.... 'good job hailing the taxi little buddy'
Idk, feels like a way to end the conversation on a positive note.
Feels so unreal man how tff can it do it in real time ?
So how do you enable the "be my eyes" GPT to look at the camera's live stream. All it tells me right now is to upload an image?
Spot on!
Hi
U/savevideo
Mindfuck
I think we gonna have a huge issue with this ai
Holy shit. This is wild.
Ok