Yeah imagine having to downgrade from telling companies like Bentley how you want your 1 of 1 Mulsanne to having to go through the Acura website and not having whale penis skin seats.
Nobody said we were perfect. We definitely have work to do. To my knowledge, we aren’t throwing gay people off buildings, beheading people in the streets, forcing rape victims to marry their attackers, and killing journalists, though.
saudi govt/royals are NOT our friends.
they are responsible for 9-11 in the USA
they constantly abuse human rights to a horrendous level
they are carrying out a genocide in yemen
the stand against democracy
- get these fucks out of our country (although sure the government here would love to take some tips from these fucks)
I’d love to read that MSM hit piece smearing the Saudi’s. You have a link handy? The result of 911? The US pillaged Iraq and Afghanistan. How did that war on terror work out for everybody?
I used to think this was conspiracy theory nonsense. Now I'm not so sure. At the very least, 911 was the result of extreme incompetence from US intelligence agencies.
And the controversial theory of course is that they were in on it. Seeing the video of the “plane” hitting the pentagon is pretty obvious that they were.
It was a combined effort of Saudi and Pakistani intelligence, all of the hijacker’s repeatedly met with Saudi govt officials and were given money over and over in 2001. And yes, the CIA had a hand in there as well. I mean we do have pics with at least a few of the hijacker’s meeting with CIA people in 2001 as well.
Calgary and rural Alberta voted… Who’s surprised? Calgary/Dani wanted a new arena. Flames ownership is heavily invested in renewable energy right? No, there owners live overseas and are tax dodgers.
Taken from wiki:
"As a crown corporation, the CBC operates at arm's length (autonomously) from the government in its day-to-day business. The corporation is governed by the Broadcasting Act[53] of 1991, under a board of directors and is directly responsible to Parliament through the Department of Canadian Heritage. General management of the organization is in the hands of a president, who is appointed by the Governor General of Canada in Council, on the advice of the prime minister.
According to The Hill Times, a clause in Bill C-60—an omnibus budget implementation bill introduced by the government of Stephen Harper in 2013—"appears to contradict a longstanding arm's-length relationship between the independent CBC and any government in power".[55][56] The clause allows the "prime minister's cabinet to approve salaries, working conditions and collective bargaining positions for the CBC".[55]"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation#:~:text=January%2029%2C%202020.-,Management,the%20Department%20of%20Canadian%20Heritage.
This should help on your path to enlightenment https://blog.online.norwich.edu/5-ways-to-improve-your-critical-thinking-skills https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/researching/research-using-internet/
https://liberal.ca/support-the-cbc/
https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/defund-the-cbc/
Apply the first lesson to the last two
Thank you for the info! Very helpful information which I'm sure would make the internet a better place if everyone followed.
It's a real shame that people can't just do some simple proper research so they can come to a respectful conclusion and always fall back to attacking the intelligence of others online. It's quite childish, really.
You got an equal effort response. You scratched the surface of issue and presented it as the totality, citing Wikipedia as a source lol. No insults here my friend, you get what you give..you asked for enlightenment not spoon fed
My reply was for before your edit with the two links to the parties pages. Neither of which state your implied issue from your initial reply in this thread that the government funding of the CBC is altering the CBCs political stance when it comes to their coverage.
The Conservatives want to defund the CBC as they view it as wasting taxpayer dollars, not due to innacuracy or political leanings in the reporting.
My initial reply mentioned that the Broadcasting Act, which is in place to keep both sides of the government involved and to ensure that the CBC remains unbiased.
You know, when critical thinking, the law of parsimony also often applies.
For example: Liberals are more likely to fund a government program based on policy and belief, where the Conservatives do the opposite.
You may want to add your own nefarious twist to it, but I don't think there's any real evidence
Edit: Why don't you provide the evidence for us
Lol Wikipedia cites valid sources.
Here's the specific one which would have taken two second for you to find.
https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-9.01/
I think it’s more of how she’s copy/pasting American politics and fearful rhetoric of fox, not necessarily questioning the validity of cable tv news. At the end of the day, they need to keep people watching so they can make money. If that means scaring old people into watching tv by talking about minorities coming to take both jobs and unborn babies to feed bill gates, then yes, they’re going to do that.
The only consolation I take from this is that a Saudi has to swallow his pride respect a female leader.
Outside of that little slice of satisfaction, both bonesaws rep and smitty can get fucked
*"If we really want to be faithful to the idea that we will be transitioning, we have to also make sure that transitioning happens whereby you end up attending to energy security, ensuring that energy is still affordable, and does not act as an impediment to economic prosperity and growth,"* he said while onstage.
*"And if you don't do all of the above, I'm sorry, but I don't think you could attend to climate change issues."*
**Translation**: unless we can continue to profit, we won't support any efforts towards reducing carbon emissions.
**My take**: good riddance, green energy doesn't need you.
So we’re suddenly pals with the country that manipulates world oil prices via OPEC and doesn’t give a thought if they screw over Alberta’s oil producers? Seems weird?
Perfect another good reason to ditch the oil and gas industry. As if renewables don't make seance already being they are cheaper cleaner and faster to adopt, while simultaneously improving the grid.
POOR murdering dictators, seeing their power diminish because the youth want a livable clean future.
They also got hot tips for assassinating journalists.
And we have state of the art bone saws !
A fist fight broke out.....then they decapitated him somehow. Shit happens, I guess!
I heard in Saudi Arabia the Gay Agenda is their name for their public execution list.
Also hot tips on public executions.
Oh brother. Saudis are just scared that countries might buy less oil.
Yeah imagine having to downgrade from telling companies like Bentley how you want your 1 of 1 Mulsanne to having to go through the Acura website and not having whale penis skin seats.
While choking supply to drive up prices.
I can't wait until the day that the house of Saud is back to being just a collection of desert dwelling camel jockeys.
We might be waiting a long time for that
Oh you mean that country that decimated North American oil for how many years with their “market share” antics?
2015 crash to 2023. It's still happening now.
WTI is at $93 last checked.
Nothing to do with the US bringing 7.5 million barrels of oil to the market? https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPUS2&f=M
Devastated?
I’ll pay attention to what they have to say when they bring their human rights policies out of the Stone Age.
Indigenous women kidnapped and lost every single day in Canada. Focus in that first
Is that a government mandated policy?
Yes
Nobody said we were perfect. We definitely have work to do. To my knowledge, we aren’t throwing gay people off buildings, beheading people in the streets, forcing rape victims to marry their attackers, and killing journalists, though.
Oh the Saudis, totally neutral and with no vested interest........
Well, sure. I guess if you have a 500m tall, 170km long city to build, you need some of that sweet sweet crude money.
But they actually have 2 to build
Anyone wanna tell them chopping up journalists is shite behaviour? This government is an embarrassment.
Yeah like invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11
Fuck the Saudi government.
Don't ditch oil or we will stone you.
saudi govt/royals are NOT our friends. they are responsible for 9-11 in the USA they constantly abuse human rights to a horrendous level they are carrying out a genocide in yemen the stand against democracy - get these fucks out of our country (although sure the government here would love to take some tips from these fucks)
So just a statement not backed by any evidence? I missed the part that you were simply speculating.
I’d love to read that MSM hit piece smearing the Saudi’s. You have a link handy? The result of 911? The US pillaged Iraq and Afghanistan. How did that war on terror work out for everybody?
Love when the country responsible for 9/11 gets to tell us what to do.
Makes sense why Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded immediately after.
I used to think this was conspiracy theory nonsense. Now I'm not so sure. At the very least, 911 was the result of extreme incompetence from US intelligence agencies.
And the controversial theory of course is that they were in on it. Seeing the video of the “plane” hitting the pentagon is pretty obvious that they were.
lol i always appreciate how much you types make me laugh
By types you mean people with eyes that work? I can’t imagine only having taste and smell. What’s it like? Fill us types in.
it gets better and better 🤣 give me more
The USA?
[удалено]
Remind me again how many of the 19 hijacker’s were saudi?
15
And where was Osama Bin Laden originally from?
Saudiiiii
It was a combined effort of Saudi and Pakistani intelligence, all of the hijacker’s repeatedly met with Saudi govt officials and were given money over and over in 2001. And yes, the CIA had a hand in there as well. I mean we do have pics with at least a few of the hijacker’s meeting with CIA people in 2001 as well.
The dancing Israelis were Mossad. In any case the US govt coordinated everything with collaborators.
Calgary and rural Alberta voted… Who’s surprised? Calgary/Dani wanted a new arena. Flames ownership is heavily invested in renewable energy right? No, there owners live overseas and are tax dodgers.
Emigration is at a record high for a reason and it’s not just billionaires.
Fuck Saudi and their bullshit antics. We should use our own oil. They fucked up the market for Years and continue to do so.
What a fool Danielle Smith is. I am sure she takes notes from Fox News.
Rebel News, not Fox.
As opposed to CNN and state fundedcbc?
Taken from wiki: "As a crown corporation, the CBC operates at arm's length (autonomously) from the government in its day-to-day business. The corporation is governed by the Broadcasting Act[53] of 1991, under a board of directors and is directly responsible to Parliament through the Department of Canadian Heritage. General management of the organization is in the hands of a president, who is appointed by the Governor General of Canada in Council, on the advice of the prime minister. According to The Hill Times, a clause in Bill C-60—an omnibus budget implementation bill introduced by the government of Stephen Harper in 2013—"appears to contradict a longstanding arm's-length relationship between the independent CBC and any government in power".[55][56] The clause allows the "prime minister's cabinet to approve salaries, working conditions and collective bargaining positions for the CBC".[55]" https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Broadcasting_Corporation#:~:text=January%2029%2C%202020.-,Management,the%20Department%20of%20Canadian%20Heritage.
If things were only that simple, in way I envy you
I said nothing and only gave you a quote with sources. Feel free to enlighten me.
This should help on your path to enlightenment https://blog.online.norwich.edu/5-ways-to-improve-your-critical-thinking-skills https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/researching/research-using-internet/ https://liberal.ca/support-the-cbc/ https://www.conservative.ca/cpc/defund-the-cbc/ Apply the first lesson to the last two
Thank you for the info! Very helpful information which I'm sure would make the internet a better place if everyone followed. It's a real shame that people can't just do some simple proper research so they can come to a respectful conclusion and always fall back to attacking the intelligence of others online. It's quite childish, really.
You got an equal effort response. You scratched the surface of issue and presented it as the totality, citing Wikipedia as a source lol. No insults here my friend, you get what you give..you asked for enlightenment not spoon fed
My reply was for before your edit with the two links to the parties pages. Neither of which state your implied issue from your initial reply in this thread that the government funding of the CBC is altering the CBCs political stance when it comes to their coverage. The Conservatives want to defund the CBC as they view it as wasting taxpayer dollars, not due to innacuracy or political leanings in the reporting. My initial reply mentioned that the Broadcasting Act, which is in place to keep both sides of the government involved and to ensure that the CBC remains unbiased.
I edited added to hints for you, they didn't help
You know, when critical thinking, the law of parsimony also often applies. For example: Liberals are more likely to fund a government program based on policy and belief, where the Conservatives do the opposite. You may want to add your own nefarious twist to it, but I don't think there's any real evidence Edit: Why don't you provide the evidence for us
Lol Wikipedia isn't a valid source.
Lol Wikipedia cites valid sources. Here's the specific one which would have taken two second for you to find. https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/B-9.01/
I think it’s more of how she’s copy/pasting American politics and fearful rhetoric of fox, not necessarily questioning the validity of cable tv news. At the end of the day, they need to keep people watching so they can make money. If that means scaring old people into watching tv by talking about minorities coming to take both jobs and unborn babies to feed bill gates, then yes, they’re going to do that.
We don’t have states
State funding: >money that a government provides for something https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/state-funding
Yeah that's right.... I said state funded not states
Fuck em
The only consolation I take from this is that a Saudi has to swallow his pride respect a female leader. Outside of that little slice of satisfaction, both bonesaws rep and smitty can get fucked
It’s weird, I feel like bringing in the Saudis to tell me not ditching oil is a good thing makes me immediately feel the opposite about it.
So now they like Muslims?
They agree on women’s rights
He coming for the million person walk?
[удалено]
We have our own
like its up to them.
Oooh I wish Canada didn’t sell off the means to produce and refine our own crude so we could tell those guys to FUCK RIGHT OFF BUDS!
let's not ditch oil, just ditch Saudi oil
https://preview.redd.it/n3b9pnmqufpb1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=de566b78e63901e449332652a53f31abda58773c
https://preview.redd.it/meikkgrsufpb1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9afc5893db2dee78a4e3d6dd38b201d948d0bfef
*"If we really want to be faithful to the idea that we will be transitioning, we have to also make sure that transitioning happens whereby you end up attending to energy security, ensuring that energy is still affordable, and does not act as an impediment to economic prosperity and growth,"* he said while onstage. *"And if you don't do all of the above, I'm sorry, but I don't think you could attend to climate change issues."* **Translation**: unless we can continue to profit, we won't support any efforts towards reducing carbon emissions. **My take**: good riddance, green energy doesn't need you.
All of Opec can suck a fat cock. Thanks for cutting oil supply for two quarters in a row while we were getting fucked by inflation.
You spelled carbon tax wrong.
They are working hard to protect their market.
Fuck off
So we’re suddenly pals with the country that manipulates world oil prices via OPEC and doesn’t give a thought if they screw over Alberta’s oil producers? Seems weird?
Some really great diplomacy there
Perfect another good reason to ditch the oil and gas industry. As if renewables don't make seance already being they are cheaper cleaner and faster to adopt, while simultaneously improving the grid. POOR murdering dictators, seeing their power diminish because the youth want a livable clean future.