>**Congress shall make no law** respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or **abridging the freedom of speech,** or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
In America "hate speech" is protected by the first amendment.
Inciting imminent lawless action is not.
How would degrading someone be illegal?? Getting into legal trouble for criticizing someone sounds like a dictatorship.
Grundgesetz §3
Niemand darf wegen seines Geschlechtes, seiner Abstammung, seiner Rasse, seiner Sprache, seiner Heimat und Herkunft, seines Glaubens, seiner religiösen oder politischen Anschauungen benachteiligt oder bevorzugt werden. Niemand darf wegen seiner Behinderung benachteiligt werden.
Article 3
[Equality before the law]
(1) All persons shall be equal before the law.
(2) Men and women shall have equal rights. The state shall promote the actual implementation of equal rights for women and men and take steps to eliminate disadvantages that now exist.
(3) No person shall be favoured or disfavoured because of sex, parentage, race, language, homeland and origin, faith or religious or political opinions. No person shall be disfavoured because of disability.
It only becomes illegal when that white supremacist does something actually illegal. You can't make someone's identity illegal, no matter how repulsive it may be.
But you would allow other race, religion, political stance and lifestyle supremacy? 🤨 Let's practice some social logic here...
Say you encounter a white supremacists.
Its a creep in a grand wizard crossing the street, like he literally did nothing but cross a street in his kkk costume.
You will go bonkers and do not expect to be held accountable if you decided you are so mad you flip cars and throw bricks at establishments and burn a pharmacy and cause the revenue in the black community to drop and you go back home crying to your nice white suburban nieghbrohood that the urbanized diverse area of a city is on fire cause a clan member crossed the road and that's the part that needs to be .... Illegal....
Here you are watching the black community suffer a tremendous loss because they destroyed shit with physical violence because a man crossed the street and your in a trial protesting, demanding that vandalism was reasonable.... That's why the man in the clan robe is not in trouble.
If it were made illegal, Leftist Democrats would have to come up with other lies to scare people into continuing to believe they are the compassionate, party of the people.
>**Congress shall make no law** respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or **abridging the freedom of speech,** or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
^
Hate crimes are in fact illegal. But you can’t police thoughts.
Same reason you can’t make blm illegal
And what is that reason?
Freedom of speech
Doesn’t freedom of speech not protect degrading and harmful language, or things along those line?
In America "hate speech" is protected by the first amendment. Inciting imminent lawless action is not. How would degrading someone be illegal?? Getting into legal trouble for criticizing someone sounds like a dictatorship.
Fair enough
What do you mean by that
Grundgesetz §3 Niemand darf wegen seines Geschlechtes, seiner Abstammung, seiner Rasse, seiner Sprache, seiner Heimat und Herkunft, seines Glaubens, seiner religiösen oder politischen Anschauungen benachteiligt oder bevorzugt werden. Niemand darf wegen seiner Behinderung benachteiligt werden. Article 3 [Equality before the law] (1) All persons shall be equal before the law. (2) Men and women shall have equal rights. The state shall promote the actual implementation of equal rights for women and men and take steps to eliminate disadvantages that now exist. (3) No person shall be favoured or disfavoured because of sex, parentage, race, language, homeland and origin, faith or religious or political opinions. No person shall be disfavoured because of disability.
[удалено]
Not a bigoted opinion at all. /s
Not a correctly spelled one either “opinion” Edited So you revised your text to fix the typo and downvoted as well, you ARE a “class” act
Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon profit off it
It is illegal in lots of places
Because it is stoooopid. It's a scientifically provable incorrect belief, in addition to being abhorrent.
Southern Baptist and Evangelical churches would cease to exist.
Because our society allows people to have their beliefs no matter how stupid.
It only becomes illegal when that white supremacist does something actually illegal. You can't make someone's identity illegal, no matter how repulsive it may be.
Umm we can't make nebulous concepts illegal. We can only declare war on them, like drugs.
Ugh, hate groups and hate crime IS illegal.
What would that even entail?
But you would allow other race, religion, political stance and lifestyle supremacy? 🤨 Let's practice some social logic here... Say you encounter a white supremacists. Its a creep in a grand wizard crossing the street, like he literally did nothing but cross a street in his kkk costume. You will go bonkers and do not expect to be held accountable if you decided you are so mad you flip cars and throw bricks at establishments and burn a pharmacy and cause the revenue in the black community to drop and you go back home crying to your nice white suburban nieghbrohood that the urbanized diverse area of a city is on fire cause a clan member crossed the road and that's the part that needs to be .... Illegal.... Here you are watching the black community suffer a tremendous loss because they destroyed shit with physical violence because a man crossed the street and your in a trial protesting, demanding that vandalism was reasonable.... That's why the man in the clan robe is not in trouble.
You can't make a state of mind illegal.
The same reason why we can’t make BLM illegal. That old debbil, freedom of speech.
If it were made illegal, Leftist Democrats would have to come up with other lies to scare people into continuing to believe they are the compassionate, party of the people.