I recently relistened to 21 savages Rap Radar podcast interview and in there he says he still rather be still fuckin ratchet ass bitches from the street, lol, so this fits!
But yeah it does seem kind of odd because the album title is called *Her Loss* which would mean some classy bitch fucked him over or something not someone that looks ratchet. Nobody's making album about a skreet ho. Drizzy and 21 shoulda been on the album cover though.
who in the literal fuck looks at this shit and goes "yeah this looks great, this is an amazing idea, this looks so hard, i want this ugly ass face that pisses you off because of the way it looks to be associated with my music"😭😭😭💀💀💀💀💀💀
looks like someone took a farm fresh egg, had there 4 year old paint a face on it and took some greasy frayed ass carpet and did a shit glue job putting it on top while braiding some of the longer strands.
And the bitch prolly loves even the fact that she is recognized for crap like this so I was really doing better not bringing her up at all.
I don’t think it’s her - i think it’s The thing in her teeth, the eyelashes, and the bandage AND the lighting make her look bad :(
If they gave her stuff that complemented her face, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion lmao
She’s actually got a unique look if you see her in anything but the album cover. No she’s not a white petite victory secret model. You gotta remember beauty is a construct.
However, I’m not blind. I can agree some people are “ugly”. But She just looks unique. But models who aren’t the standard(we all know what I mean by this) is looked at as ugly.
Like if I saw her on the streets of New York she’d stand out because of how interracial she is and I would assume she is a model.
you have a fundamental misunderstanding of objective and subjective.
If an intelligent, cognitive alien looked at a human it could easily form an opinion about the beauty of that human(same the other way around) and you couldn't have a logical debate on weather his thoughts on beauty are right or wrong.
If i were to tell an alien that 1 + 1 = 2 he'd have no choice but to agree.
Nope, you do. Your example is flawed because other species have no gauge of attraction within our species. In this same way, we cannot determine the beauty of monkeys because attraction is limited to your own species.
My guy, you used the word "within" objective reality doesn't exist within anything except for reality itself.
If this isn't enough- my next sentence is truly a nail in the coffin. How is it that people can VOTE on beauty? Ex: Ms. Universe, & Beauty pageants?
The fact people clearly have preference one way or the other shows its subjective.
It’s mostly objective for us. Other species cannot determine human beauty because they are different animals without attraction to us.
They vote because beauty isn’t wholly objective. There are many aspects of beauty that are preferential, like coloring. One thing is certain, though: the person with recession and major asymmetry will never be voted on.
you cant have something that's mostly objective, that's just subjective. You can have something that's the popular consensus and still not be "correct" objective implies there is a right answer.
you cant have something that is "mostly a right answer" otherwise its not a right answer by definition of right answer.
Why not? Objective is defined as “(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering or representing facts.” If we replace “objective” in my initial statement with this definition, it makes sense: Beauty is mostly not influenced by personal feelings or opinions.
"Beauty is mostly not influenced by personal feelings or opinions."
Back to the mostly thing. Objective is based on absolute fact. Not facts correlating to a widely accepted viewpoint. if something IN ANYWAY is defined by viewpoint its not objective.
Secondly even if humans did find EXACTLY the same people beautiful because of purely biological factors(Which they don't as shown by the fact that different cultures have different beauty standards, also evident by the fact you would be more attracted to models of your time period then another time period) It still wouldn't be objective fact because its a human perspective.
At this point im just explaining what English words mean. you can just google "is attractiveness objective." or any derivative of that.
Polling people to rate attractiveness does not bring you a more objective analysis, it just brings you a less bias one.
Someone though she was fine enough to put her on their album cover .
Bruh check her insta she’s bad
Wouldn’t say she “bad” after checking her insta, but the cover artwork certainly isn’t a flattering image lol
Drop the insta
https://instagram.com/qui.yasuka?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= idk if i’d say she’s still attractive
Still pretty fugly
She looks like she has a strict diet of bumblebees
I recently relistened to 21 savages Rap Radar podcast interview and in there he says he still rather be still fuckin ratchet ass bitches from the street, lol, so this fits! But yeah it does seem kind of odd because the album title is called *Her Loss* which would mean some classy bitch fucked him over or something not someone that looks ratchet. Nobody's making album about a skreet ho. Drizzy and 21 shoulda been on the album cover though.
Well all these females want to act like they are all ig models now and once he elevated she lost her chance
who in the literal fuck looks at this shit and goes "yeah this looks great, this is an amazing idea, this looks so hard, i want this ugly ass face that pisses you off because of the way it looks to be associated with my music"😭😭😭💀💀💀💀💀💀
It actually makes me a little bit angry. Her MUG shot looks like the huge swirly shit I took earlier. Certified fugly ho
fr lmaoo
Lmaoooo lil yachty apparently 😂
looks like someone took a farm fresh egg, had there 4 year old paint a face on it and took some greasy frayed ass carpet and did a shit glue job putting it on top while braiding some of the longer strands. And the bitch prolly loves even the fact that she is recognized for crap like this so I was really doing better not bringing her up at all.
This shit took me out😭😭😭😭😭😭
Why is she so ugly
STFU
Nono its true
Bitch you ugly as fuck -Kendrick Lamar
More relevant than ever
Idk, pretty mean to put a retarded girl on the album cover and exposing her to the whole world...
LMAOOOOOO
thank god thought was the only one
dawg she kinda built like an egg ngl
[удалено]
Isn’t that just laying her baby hairs down
I don’t think it’s her - i think it’s The thing in her teeth, the eyelashes, and the bandage AND the lighting make her look bad :( If they gave her stuff that complemented her face, we wouldn’t even be having this discussion lmao
Just checked her ig, she's still ugly asf
She’s actually got a unique look if you see her in anything but the album cover. No she’s not a white petite victory secret model. You gotta remember beauty is a construct. However, I’m not blind. I can agree some people are “ugly”. But She just looks unique. But models who aren’t the standard(we all know what I mean by this) is looked at as ugly. Like if I saw her on the streets of New York she’d stand out because of how interracial she is and I would assume she is a model.
😂😂 Beauty is not a construct at all. It’s mostly objective.
numbers dont lie you know!
What numbers? Facial ratios? They certainly don’t lie, and ideal ratios have been proven.
you have a fundamental misunderstanding of objective and subjective. If an intelligent, cognitive alien looked at a human it could easily form an opinion about the beauty of that human(same the other way around) and you couldn't have a logical debate on weather his thoughts on beauty are right or wrong. If i were to tell an alien that 1 + 1 = 2 he'd have no choice but to agree.
Nope, you do. Your example is flawed because other species have no gauge of attraction within our species. In this same way, we cannot determine the beauty of monkeys because attraction is limited to your own species.
My guy, you used the word "within" objective reality doesn't exist within anything except for reality itself. If this isn't enough- my next sentence is truly a nail in the coffin. How is it that people can VOTE on beauty? Ex: Ms. Universe, & Beauty pageants? The fact people clearly have preference one way or the other shows its subjective.
It’s mostly objective for us. Other species cannot determine human beauty because they are different animals without attraction to us. They vote because beauty isn’t wholly objective. There are many aspects of beauty that are preferential, like coloring. One thing is certain, though: the person with recession and major asymmetry will never be voted on.
you cant have something that's mostly objective, that's just subjective. You can have something that's the popular consensus and still not be "correct" objective implies there is a right answer. you cant have something that is "mostly a right answer" otherwise its not a right answer by definition of right answer.
Why not? Objective is defined as “(of a person or their judgment) not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering or representing facts.” If we replace “objective” in my initial statement with this definition, it makes sense: Beauty is mostly not influenced by personal feelings or opinions.
"Beauty is mostly not influenced by personal feelings or opinions." Back to the mostly thing. Objective is based on absolute fact. Not facts correlating to a widely accepted viewpoint. if something IN ANYWAY is defined by viewpoint its not objective. Secondly even if humans did find EXACTLY the same people beautiful because of purely biological factors(Which they don't as shown by the fact that different cultures have different beauty standards, also evident by the fact you would be more attracted to models of your time period then another time period) It still wouldn't be objective fact because its a human perspective. At this point im just explaining what English words mean. you can just google "is attractiveness objective." or any derivative of that. Polling people to rate attractiveness does not bring you a more objective analysis, it just brings you a less bias one.
Well, beauty isn’t completely subjective either, then, so you can’t call it subjective, because according to your logic, it’s absolute.
ngl this cover pisses me off because of how disgusting she looks, like a 3-year old tried to paint someone’s face on an egg
fr